Sophon

1.5K posts

Sophon banner
Sophon

Sophon

@Sophon

we build novel consumer experiences in crypto & ai next up: @paywithpyre

Katılım Ocak 2024
87 Takip Edilen147.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Sophon
Sophon@Sophon·
payments are boring: a passive experience that ends at the tap of a card. what if one of the most repeated actions in your life was also the most fun? @paywithpyre will bring payments to life. (entertainment finance)
Sophon tweet media
English
23
5
46
21.6K
Sophon retweetledi
seb
seb@0xsseb·
As expected when we announced our pivot a few weeks ago, I think a lot more founders / chains are going to be doing the same thing. Def takes courage! It's funny because outside of crypto, it's generally celebrated when a founder is hustling and making tough or unpopular decisions to make it happen. Looking fwd to what @hotpot_dao and @bread_ cook up now.
Shuyao Kong@hotpot_dao

After spending the last two years building the MegaMafia, we’ve decided to sunset the program. While it was a success in many ways, we believe that the program was built on assumptions that no longer hold. Here are some reflections, and what’s coming up next. > We had real conviction in Mafia founders, and have gone above and beyond in standing by their side to bring their products to market. Some examples include: restructuring the GTE leadership team during critical moments just one month after their initial pre-seed raise, offering to buy out Noise's investors when they tried to push out the CEO, and played a crucial role as they pivoted from their initial prediction market idea, and merging the Tenten and HitOne team after seeing the synergy between the two. > Across both cohorts which in total included 20 teams, we lent our reputation and networks to founders so they could go on to raise over $80m in funding in pre-seeds, seeds, and series As. We kept the MegaETH’s raise to a minimum so investors can get more skin in the game with the Apps directly, rather than the protocol. > For teams that had difficulty in raising when the market turned bearish, we extended resources, engineering bandwidth, and actual capital (e.g. six figures in audit for Avon) so they could make it to Mainnet. We did it solely to help founders see their vision through. > We set the product vision for 5 teams and supported their initial builds before eventually facilitating their fundraises from leading tier-1 and tier-2 funds. > We spent significant cash (in the millions) bootstrapping teams’ DeFi requirements, through market-making support, direct lending, and other liquidity related needs. > We hosted 5 large-scale in-person events (New York, Brussels, Bangkok, Singapore, and Seoul) so MegaMafia projects could meet investors and community members from around the world. In many ways, the MegaMafia was the best incubator of this cycle. But very little of that value has trickled to Mega. In fact, most of those applications are no longer being built with us. At the time, we intentionally took no equity, governance rights, nor economic value because we wanted people to be genuinely bought into the Mega vision and the power of our technology. While we will continue to support existing MegaMafia projects, there will no longer be MegaMafia 3.0. What’s next? Our ecosystem goal going forward is to support teams building OMEGA applications, apps that are only possible on MegaETH, using our wallet infrastructure and stablecoin. More importantly, we're redirecting the energy we were lending to third-party builders into our own first-party applications: consumer-grade apps, built directly by us, for the people we're trying to serve. Where MegaMafia was indirect, betting on other teams to build value we'd eventually capture, first-party apps let us build direct relationships with end users ourselves, with all the upside and accountability that comes with owning the outcome. We're aiming for faster feedback loops, with insane focus on accruing value directly to the protocol.

English
12
2
48
9.5K
Sophon retweetledi
oskari
oskari@oskaritem·
inevitable, and good to see teams making the hard calls instead of continuing down a path that clearly isn’t working our biggest learnings at sophon were: 1) you can’t outsource pmf for a new chain. great founders won’t take on the additional platform risk when building a startup is already hard enough. the best builders gravitate toward established ecosystems where the tech is good enough 2) once you pivot to first-party apps, running your own chain rarely makes economic sense. the engineering effort is better spent focusing on the app vs. maintaining what is mostly commoditized infra would guess mega eventually reaches the same conclusion on #2. & their stack is more ambitious than ours was, so i’d imagine the roi hurdle is even higher - but happy to be proven wrong either way, respect for adapting! see you in the app arena 🫡
Shuyao Kong@hotpot_dao

After spending the last two years building the MegaMafia, we’ve decided to sunset the program. While it was a success in many ways, we believe that the program was built on assumptions that no longer hold. Here are some reflections, and what’s coming up next. > We had real conviction in Mafia founders, and have gone above and beyond in standing by their side to bring their products to market. Some examples include: restructuring the GTE leadership team during critical moments just one month after their initial pre-seed raise, offering to buy out Noise's investors when they tried to push out the CEO, and played a crucial role as they pivoted from their initial prediction market idea, and merging the Tenten and HitOne team after seeing the synergy between the two. > Across both cohorts which in total included 20 teams, we lent our reputation and networks to founders so they could go on to raise over $80m in funding in pre-seeds, seeds, and series As. We kept the MegaETH’s raise to a minimum so investors can get more skin in the game with the Apps directly, rather than the protocol. > For teams that had difficulty in raising when the market turned bearish, we extended resources, engineering bandwidth, and actual capital (e.g. six figures in audit for Avon) so they could make it to Mainnet. We did it solely to help founders see their vision through. > We set the product vision for 5 teams and supported their initial builds before eventually facilitating their fundraises from leading tier-1 and tier-2 funds. > We spent significant cash (in the millions) bootstrapping teams’ DeFi requirements, through market-making support, direct lending, and other liquidity related needs. > We hosted 5 large-scale in-person events (New York, Brussels, Bangkok, Singapore, and Seoul) so MegaMafia projects could meet investors and community members from around the world. In many ways, the MegaMafia was the best incubator of this cycle. But very little of that value has trickled to Mega. In fact, most of those applications are no longer being built with us. At the time, we intentionally took no equity, governance rights, nor economic value because we wanted people to be genuinely bought into the Mega vision and the power of our technology. While we will continue to support existing MegaMafia projects, there will no longer be MegaMafia 3.0. What’s next? Our ecosystem goal going forward is to support teams building OMEGA applications, apps that are only possible on MegaETH, using our wallet infrastructure and stablecoin. More importantly, we're redirecting the energy we were lending to third-party builders into our own first-party applications: consumer-grade apps, built directly by us, for the people we're trying to serve. Where MegaMafia was indirect, betting on other teams to build value we'd eventually capture, first-party apps let us build direct relationships with end users ourselves, with all the upside and accountability that comes with owning the outcome. We're aiming for faster feedback loops, with insane focus on accruing value directly to the protocol.

English
6
4
17
2.4K
Sophon
Sophon@Sophon·
@hotpot_dao @megaeth > we're redirecting the energy we were lending to third-party builders into our own first-party applications sounds familiar 🫡
English
0
0
18
2.8K
Shuyao Kong
Shuyao Kong@hotpot_dao·
After spending the last two years building the MegaMafia, we’ve decided to sunset the program. While it was a success in many ways, we believe that the program was built on assumptions that no longer hold. Here are some reflections, and what’s coming up next. > We had real conviction in Mafia founders, and have gone above and beyond in standing by their side to bring their products to market. Some examples include: restructuring the GTE leadership team during critical moments just one month after their initial pre-seed raise, offering to buy out Noise's investors when they tried to push out the CEO, and played a crucial role as they pivoted from their initial prediction market idea, and merging the Tenten and HitOne team after seeing the synergy between the two. > Across both cohorts which in total included 20 teams, we lent our reputation and networks to founders so they could go on to raise over $80m in funding in pre-seeds, seeds, and series As. We kept the MegaETH’s raise to a minimum so investors can get more skin in the game with the Apps directly, rather than the protocol. > For teams that had difficulty in raising when the market turned bearish, we extended resources, engineering bandwidth, and actual capital (e.g. six figures in audit for Avon) so they could make it to Mainnet. We did it solely to help founders see their vision through. > We set the product vision for 5 teams and supported their initial builds before eventually facilitating their fundraises from leading tier-1 and tier-2 funds. > We spent significant cash (in the millions) bootstrapping teams’ DeFi requirements, through market-making support, direct lending, and other liquidity related needs. > We hosted 5 large-scale in-person events (New York, Brussels, Bangkok, Singapore, and Seoul) so MegaMafia projects could meet investors and community members from around the world. In many ways, the MegaMafia was the best incubator of this cycle. But very little of that value has trickled to Mega. In fact, most of those applications are no longer being built with us. At the time, we intentionally took no equity, governance rights, nor economic value because we wanted people to be genuinely bought into the Mega vision and the power of our technology. While we will continue to support existing MegaMafia projects, there will no longer be MegaMafia 3.0. What’s next? Our ecosystem goal going forward is to support teams building OMEGA applications, apps that are only possible on MegaETH, using our wallet infrastructure and stablecoin. More importantly, we're redirecting the energy we were lending to third-party builders into our own first-party applications: consumer-grade apps, built directly by us, for the people we're trying to serve. Where MegaMafia was indirect, betting on other teams to build value we'd eventually capture, first-party apps let us build direct relationships with end users ourselves, with all the upside and accountability that comes with owning the outcome. We're aiming for faster feedback loops, with insane focus on accruing value directly to the protocol.
English
120
46
590
215.5K
Sophon retweetledi
oskari
oskari@oskaritem·
payments are the highest-frequency financial action in your life, but they're designed to be forgotten. so much to explore in making them a more active experience! no-loss lotteries were a genuinely novel primitive: they took the most passive financial action there is (depositing into savings) and gave it a shot at upside. payments are still waiting for their version buy now, pay maybe is the obvious idea, but it's also the weakest one due to passivity (wait for a notification) + structurally it drifts into the gambling classification the design space i most care about is active, dopamine-driven micromoments that give people real shots at asymmetric upside - funded by underlying cryptoeconomics instead of users having to put up excess capital to play for it pyre will roll out piece by piece so we can test a bunch of different mechanics with a crypto-native audience first (most risk-on users), finding the right balance on the r/r spectrum for a daily habit like payments, then ramping up mass market distro with more battle-tested gamification v1 is done btw. compliance clearance just moves slower on a new primitive like this when banking partners haven’t seen such a thing before dm me if you want in on the beta!
Sophon@Sophon

payments are boring: a passive experience that ends at the tap of a card. what if one of the most repeated actions in your life was also the most fun? @paywithpyre will bring payments to life. (entertainment finance)

English
10
1
18
3K
Sophon retweetledi
Pyre
Pyre@paywithpyre·
We're hiring a Head of Brainrot 🔥 -be the face of Pyre on IG, tiktok & X -concept, shoot, edit, post videos daily -terminally online -hypebeast -funny & charismatic -into fashion & thrifting -NY, LA, London or Miami based Dms open or send @n_andrea_q a note with your socials.
English
14
4
53
6.2K
Sophon retweetledi
doodlifts
doodlifts@doodlifts·
People may dunk on the sophon pivot but I think the buy now pay maybe card originally teased was one of the most exciting aspects. I'm still bullish on entertainment finance as a whole. Im going to try @paywithpyre, Use my link and get a boost ⤵️ getpyre.com/?ref=qbx7g89
Sophon@Sophon

payments are boring: a passive experience that ends at the tap of a card. what if one of the most repeated actions in your life was also the most fun? @paywithpyre will bring payments to life. (entertainment finance)

English
7
3
26
6.5K
Leon Abboud
Leon Abboud@leonabboud·
Last thing I'll say about this. For the creators who worked with Sophon, and got paid to talk about them, who are now gravedancing and calling this a rug. Where are your ethics and professional manners? You take money from someone, and then dunk on them for engagement? If you've partnered with someone whose business didn't pan out, stay on the side. Or don't take their money if you intend on dunking later. Do better.
Leon Abboud@leonabboud

This is bound to happen to 99% of chains. The industry realized this cycle that there's no PMF in having another, as good as everyone else, chain. PMF is found by building products that genuinely solve problems in the market. Let's see how this pans out for them.

English
41
2
126
12.3K
Sophon
Sophon@Sophon·
Today we burned 46.5M SOPH: ~0.5% of total supply. SOPH's utility is evolving from gas and staking to buybacks and burns funded by product revenue. More to follow as @paywithpyre launches soon.
English
23
8
89
19.5K
Sophon retweetledi
Pyre
Pyre@paywithpyre·
Not another crypto card. getpyre.com
Pyre tweet media
English
28
14
98
16.3K
Wals
Wals@walsxbt·
MegaETH, Monad and Blast should follow Sophon and move to Base
English
40
0
74
5.7K
Dutchtide.eth
Dutchtide.eth@dutchtide·
@Sophon Seeing how basically nothing interesting is build on any chain this is actually exciting. I hope you guys bring your flair and energy to interesting products that are making a difference!
English
1
0
3
1.9K
Sophon
Sophon@Sophon·
Today, we're decommissioning the Sophon Chain. You don't find product-market fit by defending sunk costs. Instead, you learn and adapt.
English
140
34
539
555.3K
Sophon retweetledi
seb
seb@0xsseb·
Thanks to those that support us going forward Keep on pushing and building until something works! sophon.com
seb tweet mediaseb tweet media
English
11
5
50
6.3K
Cecilien
Cecilien@cecilialsn·
I admire this move, most other chains would rather burn another 2 years away. looking forward to see what comes next for them, it might inspire some of the others to follow
Sophon@Sophon

x.com/i/article/2070…

English
2
0
10
634