Souvik Kumar Dolui

7K posts

Souvik Kumar Dolui banner
Souvik Kumar Dolui

Souvik Kumar Dolui

@souvik_dolui

Aerospace Engineering, IIT Bombay

Delhi Katılım Mart 2016
25 Takip Edilen296 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Souvik Kumar Dolui
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui·
Hello @Xixi_2328857214 & @PandemicTruther, Please read the following thread about Boeing787 Dreamliner crash.
Rachel Chitra (David)@rachelchitra

1/12 🚨Air India crash ✈️🔥On the crash anniversary, marking the loss of 260 lives, AAIB interim report's delayed as AAIB's trapped in a web of its own making. It created a relight story based on blackbox data, that's now getting dismantled by engine maker GE's own manuals. @GE_Aerospace @DGCAIndia 🧵So let's look at 12 stories, published over 12 months since last June 12, 2026 - as to the truth of what happened on AI 171 In my piece for @frontline_india, I go into how AAIB implied a simple story & @WSJ ran with it The story: 08:08:42 UTC - Capt Sumeet “cuts off” fuel 08:08:47 UTC - Both engines N2 fall minimum idle 08:08:52 ETC: First officer Clive moves fuel switch 1 for left engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 1 relight - Engine 1’s core “stops decelerating, reverses and starts to recover” 08:08:56 UTC: FO Clive moves fuel switch 2 for right engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 2 relight begins But here's the problem. Once a GEnx core goes below self‑sustaining speed, it cannot restart without power from the APU or live engine. And AI171 didn't have starter core-spin power. AAIB report itself admits that: 1. APU was not online. It takes 50-60 seconds to generate power. It's inlet door was only opening at 08:08:54 UTC 2. Dual engine shutdown So where did the energy for this miracle “recovery” come from? This then shifts the timestamp of when relight occurred. That it can't be crew-commanded but FADEC commanded. Since as per AAIB report & GE manuals, the relight that happened, where "engine 1 core deceleration stopped, reversed and progressed to recovery." There was no electrical power left on the plane at the 13th and 17th second after takeoff for such a relight. So this relight could only happen in a timestamp, where the engines were running fast. In a narrow window of 5-8 seconds, when the blades were spinning fast enough for full voltage electricity generation from the engine's generator (PMG). And it could've only happened if FADEC cutoff fuel at 08:08:45 UTC, under TCMA, when the plane's flight computers (FCMs) were rebooting - sending it temporarily into its default/fail-safe mode i.e. ground mode in air. And then relight happened for engine 1 and 2 between 08:08:45-50 UTC. So here's this thriller of a piece, edited by @Aarohanvasanth & @vaishnaroy - where you get an inside peak into the crash; how the plane went into degraded mode on its previous flight - AI 423 Delhi to Ahmedabad. How 10 years of internal correspondence on crash flight VT-ANB between Boeing & Air India; show Air India like Lion Air getting increasingly desperate dealing with a plane that had recurring issues in power generation, fire-inerter. This story shows how even after a major fire in Frankfurt that led to the plane's grounding -- Boeing remained pedantic in its approach; with short-term fixes rather than dealing with the long term design fix of what was going wrong with the plane's electrical architecture flaw. To the massive annoyance of Air India engineers, it's advice included usage of "duct tape, donuts & checks for water intrusion" when asked a question on how to deal with the burning of a critical (P100) power distribution panel. Engineers say this is like the Titanic signalling "Iceberg ahead" warnings & Boeing recommending they wipe the railings for a clean ship. frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/air…

English
2
0
3
8.9K
Souvik Kumar Dolui
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui·
Deer Chinese friends, Whenever you encounter a Chinese caste system post, just slap that with simple community note without interacting. The campaign will fizzle out.
English
470
45
846
163K
Sandeep Manudhane
Sandeep Manudhane@sandeep_PT·
As the countours of New India are now coming into focus, something very different from the dreamworld promised is beginning to emerge. It'll be an eye-opener as months go by. This is just the beginning.
Sandeep Manudhane tweet media
English
18
34
119
3.5K
Souvik Kumar Dolui
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui·
I would like to ask our dearest friends in China to build dedicated centres on South Asian Studies in eminent Chinese universities to study caste and fund anti-caste scholarships inside China. This will help better communication between the scholars of two countries.
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui

Deer Chinese friends, Whenever you encounter a Chinese caste system post, just slap that with simple community note without interacting. The campaign will fizzle out.

English
10
1
10
8.9K
Souvik Kumar Dolui retweetledi
The Wire
The Wire@thewire_in·
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's Lack of Detail in Its AI171 Crash Interim Report Worries Experts Investigation veterans say it fails both the letter and the spirit of the rules meant to protect public safety. @rachelchitra✍️ thewire.in/government/air…
English
0
3
7
2.9K
Souvik Kumar Dolui retweetledi
Rachel Chitra (David)
Rachel Chitra (David)@rachelchitra·
1/12 🚨Air India crash ✈️🔥On the crash anniversary, marking the loss of 260 lives, AAIB interim report's delayed as AAIB's trapped in a web of its own making. It created a relight story based on blackbox data, that's now getting dismantled by engine maker GE's own manuals. @GE_Aerospace @DGCAIndia 🧵So let's look at 12 stories, published over 12 months since last June 12, 2026 - as to the truth of what happened on AI 171 In my piece for @frontline_india, I go into how AAIB implied a simple story & @WSJ ran with it The story: 08:08:42 UTC - Capt Sumeet “cuts off” fuel 08:08:47 UTC - Both engines N2 fall minimum idle 08:08:52 ETC: First officer Clive moves fuel switch 1 for left engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 1 relight - Engine 1’s core “stops decelerating, reverses and starts to recover” 08:08:56 UTC: FO Clive moves fuel switch 2 for right engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 2 relight begins But here's the problem. Once a GEnx core goes below self‑sustaining speed, it cannot restart without power from the APU or live engine. And AI171 didn't have starter core-spin power. AAIB report itself admits that: 1. APU was not online. It takes 50-60 seconds to generate power. It's inlet door was only opening at 08:08:54 UTC 2. Dual engine shutdown So where did the energy for this miracle “recovery” come from? This then shifts the timestamp of when relight occurred. That it can't be crew-commanded but FADEC commanded. Since as per AAIB report & GE manuals, the relight that happened, where "engine 1 core deceleration stopped, reversed and progressed to recovery." There was no electrical power left on the plane at the 13th and 17th second after takeoff for such a relight. So this relight could only happen in a timestamp, where the engines were running fast. In a narrow window of 5-8 seconds, when the blades were spinning fast enough for full voltage electricity generation from the engine's generator (PMG). And it could've only happened if FADEC cutoff fuel at 08:08:45 UTC, under TCMA, when the plane's flight computers (FCMs) were rebooting - sending it temporarily into its default/fail-safe mode i.e. ground mode in air. And then relight happened for engine 1 and 2 between 08:08:45-50 UTC. So here's this thriller of a piece, edited by @Aarohanvasanth & @vaishnaroy - where you get an inside peak into the crash; how the plane went into degraded mode on its previous flight - AI 423 Delhi to Ahmedabad. How 10 years of internal correspondence on crash flight VT-ANB between Boeing & Air India; show Air India like Lion Air getting increasingly desperate dealing with a plane that had recurring issues in power generation, fire-inerter. This story shows how even after a major fire in Frankfurt that led to the plane's grounding -- Boeing remained pedantic in its approach; with short-term fixes rather than dealing with the long term design fix of what was going wrong with the plane's electrical architecture flaw. To the massive annoyance of Air India engineers, it's advice included usage of "duct tape, donuts & checks for water intrusion" when asked a question on how to deal with the burning of a critical (P100) power distribution panel. Engineers say this is like the Titanic signalling "Iceberg ahead" warnings & Boeing recommending they wipe the railings for a clean ship. frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/air…
English
17
99
280
39K
Souvik Kumar Dolui
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui·
Indians should learn to question and reform themselves for the service of their country. Otherwise they will die like this.👇 x.com/rachelchitra/s…
Rachel Chitra (David)@rachelchitra

1/12 🚨Air India crash ✈️🔥On the crash anniversary, marking the loss of 260 lives, AAIB interim report's delayed as AAIB's trapped in a web of its own making. It created a relight story based on blackbox data, that's now getting dismantled by engine maker GE's own manuals. @GE_Aerospace @DGCAIndia 🧵So let's look at 12 stories, published over 12 months since last June 12, 2026 - as to the truth of what happened on AI 171 In my piece for @frontline_india, I go into how AAIB implied a simple story & @WSJ ran with it The story: 08:08:42 UTC - Capt Sumeet “cuts off” fuel 08:08:47 UTC - Both engines N2 fall minimum idle 08:08:52 ETC: First officer Clive moves fuel switch 1 for left engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 1 relight - Engine 1’s core “stops decelerating, reverses and starts to recover” 08:08:56 UTC: FO Clive moves fuel switch 2 for right engine from CUTOFF to RUN Engine 2 relight begins But here's the problem. Once a GEnx core goes below self‑sustaining speed, it cannot restart without power from the APU or live engine. And AI171 didn't have starter core-spin power. AAIB report itself admits that: 1. APU was not online. It takes 50-60 seconds to generate power. It's inlet door was only opening at 08:08:54 UTC 2. Dual engine shutdown So where did the energy for this miracle “recovery” come from? This then shifts the timestamp of when relight occurred. That it can't be crew-commanded but FADEC commanded. Since as per AAIB report & GE manuals, the relight that happened, where "engine 1 core deceleration stopped, reversed and progressed to recovery." There was no electrical power left on the plane at the 13th and 17th second after takeoff for such a relight. So this relight could only happen in a timestamp, where the engines were running fast. In a narrow window of 5-8 seconds, when the blades were spinning fast enough for full voltage electricity generation from the engine's generator (PMG). And it could've only happened if FADEC cutoff fuel at 08:08:45 UTC, under TCMA, when the plane's flight computers (FCMs) were rebooting - sending it temporarily into its default/fail-safe mode i.e. ground mode in air. And then relight happened for engine 1 and 2 between 08:08:45-50 UTC. So here's this thriller of a piece, edited by @Aarohanvasanth & @vaishnaroy - where you get an inside peak into the crash; how the plane went into degraded mode on its previous flight - AI 423 Delhi to Ahmedabad. How 10 years of internal correspondence on crash flight VT-ANB between Boeing & Air India; show Air India like Lion Air getting increasingly desperate dealing with a plane that had recurring issues in power generation, fire-inerter. This story shows how even after a major fire in Frankfurt that led to the plane's grounding -- Boeing remained pedantic in its approach; with short-term fixes rather than dealing with the long term design fix of what was going wrong with the plane's electrical architecture flaw. To the massive annoyance of Air India engineers, it's advice included usage of "duct tape, donuts & checks for water intrusion" when asked a question on how to deal with the burning of a critical (P100) power distribution panel. Engineers say this is like the Titanic signalling "Iceberg ahead" warnings & Boeing recommending they wipe the railings for a clean ship. frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/air…

English
3
0
8
14K
Souvik Kumar Dolui retweetledi
Souvik Kumar Dolui retweetledi
Nilim Dutta
Nilim Dutta@NilimDutta·
It is hilarious to see Brahmin-Oppressor Caste Indians, who would have perished long ago from starvation if the Shudra did not toil to produce what they consumed, would have perished from epidemic diseases long ago if the Dalit did not clean up their shit, whose only competence is fooling people in the name of religion and caste, have become "experts" on China's social hierarchy overnight using Google. 🤣🤣🤣 China is flying 6th generation fighter prototypes while you assholes are still struggling to produce a jet engine because the engineering diagram in your Vedas proved to be fake. 🤣🤣🤣 Don't you all have any shame?
English
1
20
101
4.8K
Souvik Kumar Dolui retweetledi
Gen Ho Chi Minh
Gen Ho Chi Minh@genHCM·
Because most Vietnamese families come form the farmer or worker class, and they could not fathom the idea that no matter how hard they work, their "lowly" social status was determined from birth x.com/genHCM/status/…
Gen Ho Chi Minh@genHCM

I have seen on TikTok many Vietnamese women who married these upper caste Indians simply detailing the daily (caste based) situation in various parts of India with regards to their family lives, and our viewers coil in horror ("thank god I was born here. I'm grateful").

English
0
3
11
948
Souvik Kumar Dolui
Souvik Kumar Dolui@souvik_dolui·
Saying that China has a Caste System is same as saying Buddha is the proponent of caste system instead of Manu. If China has a caste system, who is Chinese equivalent of Manu.
English
18
0
19
2.6K