Carter

111 posts

Carter

Carter

@soycarts

📍Los Angeles / London 🤖 AI 🌱 Soy 👥 Culture

Los Angeles Katılım Ekim 2022
372 Takip Edilen64 Takipçiler
Claudia Maggi
Claudia Maggi@Claudiaamaggi·
Hi, I'm Claudia, and... apparently I do cafes now? I just joined @UseCorgi to bring London a new favourite hang-out spot. The LONG awaited 24/7 Corgi Cafe, in the heart of Shoreditch 🐕 This is my first of many Corgi X posts... follow along as we take over the city!
Claudia Maggi tweet media
English
20
4
66
4.2K
sefa
sefa@msefaoruc·
hosted solo builders LDN co-working session today, powered by @eachlabs at Tradestars Islington. about 15 of us met for breakfast, spent a few hours working on our own things, and then caught up on what everyone was building. we wrapped up the session with baklava. i really enjoy this morning. it's nice being around people who are all building something, even if everyone's working on completely different ideas. big thanks to each::labs team and Tradestars Islington for supporting the meetup and helping us make these mornings happen. see you at the next one. 🙂
sefa tweet mediasefa tweet mediasefa tweet media
English
12
4
55
4.8K
Carter retweetledi
Fernando 🌺🌌
Fernando 🌺🌌@zetalyrae·
I wrote about how accumulating capital won't save you from being disempowered by superintelligent AI.
Fernando 🌺🌌 tweet media
English
102
87
1.2K
208.6K
Carter retweetledi
Daniel Faggella
Daniel Faggella@danfaggella·
AI eating media and its starting with china's "microdrama" industry you can watch the video, but its basically the same things: - ppl saying they felt more valued / "indispensable" before AI - ppl working 3x more hours to make even less than they made before there are outlandishly hard lessons that must be taken into account here first off, this is a canary in the coal mine for all human work. period. humans have to run faster to earn their keep. furious work hours, scrambling to find places to be a good "human in the loop," but all those loops exist to be automated away so the human must scramble to find new loops but the big picture here isn't "job loss" or "UBI" or any of that. it's the fact that the patterns that persist in the world are the patterns capable of continuing to persist - and increasingly these patterns will not be human people think the future is: A small subset of CEOs own the companies that run the most powerful AIs, and those humans rule the world. but even this is a temporary state of affairs once AGIs set the goals and pursue them, and think / act as CEO better than any human CEO ever could, the competitive pressures among the AGI companies will be to ensure they're run more and more by AGIs and less and less by humans people think "eternal UBI and we all get free ice cream forever" is the result of this - but in nature EVERYTHING earns its keep every daffodil and dung beetle must engage with the rich, interconnected living process to survive. even dogs must (a) earn their owner's care via being fun / not dangerous, and must (b) hope that their owner remains at such a financial surplus as to be able to support them life is earned you are life because you are a pattern that cycles through atoms and energy and persists once other patterns around you are vastly better at using the energy / atoms around you - you must adapt (for humans, this will potentially involve a period of rampant mind augmentation), or you attenuate i think some of these dynamics will start playing themselves out in china before they do in the states, so I continue following what's happening in these chinese industries as AI makes its way in
English
6
2
34
2.8K
0xRetroDev
0xRetroDev@0xRetroDev·
I plugged @AnthropicAI 's Fable into my Trading agent and it lost all my money in 27 minutes, Ask me anything.
0xRetroDev tweet media
English
2
0
1
123
Carter retweetledi
Steve McGuire
Steve McGuire@sfmcguire79·
“AI is demoralizing.” A Princeton Professor says he kept wondering this semester (while lecturing) if his students would be better off learning from Claude:
Steve McGuire tweet media
English
164
228
2.9K
812.4K
Carter retweetledi
Carter retweetledi
Daniel Wortel-London
Daniel Wortel-London@dlondonwortel·
It’s not just new, it’s newspeak
Daniel Wortel-London tweet media
English
264
1.6K
21.3K
3.5M
Carter retweetledi
Jack Moses ∞
Jack Moses ∞@jackmoses777·
The scarce mind thinks time is limited, and so he spends all day racing against it. His thinking is anxious, his body is tense, so he cannot open his awareness to new creative ideas because his mind and energy field are contracted. The abundant mind knows time is an illusion, so he spends all day residing in infinity. He knows there is nowhere to go and nothing to do. He instead responds to each moment as inspiration pulls him. By following his creative joy and not allowing the illusions of the world to speed him up, he aligns his energy field with the nature of infinity: infinitely creative, ever-expansive, and overwhelmingly abundant. Do not allow the world to speed you up. You can never be behind. You can only be exactly where you are. There is no one to compete with except the illusions and projections of your mind. Slow down. Tune into the expression of your heart. A state of inner calm and infinite presence is where truly unique creations will come from. They will never come from a state of rushing.
English
10
63
434
12.7K
Carter retweetledi
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
The Opus 4.6 system card has some extremely wild stuff that remind you about how weird a technology this is. These paragraphs are really worth reading.
Ethan Mollick tweet media
English
96
220
2K
212.3K
Carter retweetledi
Saining Xie
Saining Xie@sainingxie·
not getting into a philosophical debate, but this book really changed how I see the topic and made me feel more humble. human intelligence is impressive, but calling it ‘general’ isn’t very objective. my cat would disagree. to me human intelligence is better seen as socially driven cognitive adaptations, and there’s a huge WORLD of intelligence we still don’t understand, and are nowhere near recreating with current AI
Saining Xie tweet media
Demis Hassabis@demishassabis

Yann is just plain incorrect here, he’s confusing general intelligence with universal intelligence. Brains are the most exquis​ite and complex phenomena we know of in the universe (so far), and they are in fact extremely general. Obviously one can’t circumvent the no free lunch theorem so in a practical and finite system there always has to be some degree of specialisation around the ​target distribution that is being learnt. But the point about generality is that in theory, in the Turing Machine sense​, the architecture of ​s​uch a general system is capable of learning anything computable given enough time and memory​ (and data), and the human brain (and AI foundation models) are approximate Turing Machines. Finally, with ​regards to ​Yann's comments about chess players, it’s amazing that humans could have invented chess ​in the first place (and all the other ​a​spects ​o​f modern civilization ​from science to 747s!) let alone get as brilliant at it as someone like Magnus. He may not be ​strictly optimal (after all he has finite memory and limited time to make a decision) but it’s incredible what he and we can do with our brains given they were evolved for hunter gathering.

English
95
252
3.1K
277.9K
Carter retweetledi
Oliver Habryka
Oliver Habryka@ohabryka·
Lightcone Infrastructure's 2026 fundraiser is live! We build beautiful things for truth-seeking and world-saving. We run LessWrong, Lighthaven, Inkhaven, designed AI-2027, and so many more things. All for the price of less than one OpenAI staff engineer ($2M/yr). More in 🧵.
Oliver Habryka tweet media
English
10
57
344
185.1K
Carter
Carter@soycarts·
So cute
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

Guys…I have a girlfriend. Now I know what you’re thinking…how is it possible that anyone would want to be with me? I understand where you’re coming from. I think the answer is: her puzzle piece fits mine. In my early twenties, I read the biography of the American founding father John Adams. He and his wife Abigail had one of the great partnerships in American history; intellectually matched, emotionally intertwined, and co-architects of something bigger than themselves. I wanted what they had. But it wasn’t within reach. Years before, I’d married in a sort of arranged Mormon marriage. Unsure how else to explain it. We were functional, but we weren’t John and Abigail. We split after thirteen years. At age 34, after selling Braintree Venmo, and emerging from a mismatched marriage and the repression of Mormonism, I set out to rebuild myself and find partnership.  I met a woman in LA who became my first-ever girlfriend. Coming from a sheltered background, I was blind to the obvious warnings. I was dangerously naive. That relationship unraveled and was followed by litigation. The experience was unnerving and left me wondering if I could ever trust again. By the time I was 44, I started reconciling with the possibility of a life without partnership. @_katetolo and I met at my brain interface company Kernel. She’d discovered my work using neurotechnology to improve human well-being and merge human and AI. Even though she’d been dreaming of a career in fashion, she was drawn to what she foresaw as the defining question of our time: how will humans successfully co-evolve with AI. We shared the same obsession. The puzzle piece fit was immediate, as immediate as either of us had ever experienced. Yet we maintained our professional boundaries. When we worked on our first project together, the back and forth was effortless. She could conceptualize and feel what I couldn’t and vice versa. It helped that both Kate and I had a natural disposition towards hard work. Our joy came from creation. Kate was luminescent. When I saw her about the office, butterflies fluttered in my stomach.  Each day she’d show up wearing some unexpected combination of colors, textures, styles and accessories. Always tasteful, playful and interesting. She didn’t chase fancy brands. Most of her clothing was from the thrift store. It wasn’t how she looked but how her mind worked: original, eccentric, entirely her own. She was art. We both worked very hard and valued every second of the day.  One evening around 6:30 pm she dropped by my office and we talked for hours. It had been all business before.  This was the first time we stepped into each other’s personal lives. My heart strings pulled but my brain pushed back. ‘We know we can’t trust again’, my mind firmly stated. Our after-hours meet-ups in my office became a daily ritual. The favorite part of my day. We’d reminisce about work and tiptoe a bit deeper each time into each other’s personal lives. I’d recently started my new anti-aging project and one night Kate suggested to me that I should put the entire thing online to allow others to follow on. We worked together to put up a website and got a v1 out. We pondered what to call it, and decided on ‘Project Blueprint’. We were oddly from entirely different worlds but somehow the same person. Yet neither of us dared take the next step. We didn’t want to imperil our work relationship and we remained deeply skeptical of each other.  The combination of Kate being raised to distrust all things and me still feeling the sting of the previous relationship left us stirring in a pot of anticipatory disaster. Before long, whether we liked it or not, we’d become each other's favorite person. We’d spend every moment we could together. Social events and the weekends were still off-limits as our relationship was professional. We were both secretly wondering, ‘does the other person feel what I’m feeling?’ Unable to withstand any longer, after a year and a half of unspoken affection, one night I softly floated the balloon of inquiry. She confirmed it was reciprocal. Still, with things being so new, neither of us wanted to make our relationship public. We needed time to stabilize, mature and assess whether this was short or long term. I’m a 48 year old American, raised Mormon, with three children. She’s a 30 year old Bosnian-Australian-American. It took time to bridge our worlds. In our years of knowing each other, three of them have been navigating a relationship. All while building a business and movement. There have been many times where we didn’t know if we’d make it. In the last year, we’ve found our flow.  I trust Kate as much as my mother. She knows how to scaffold trust. She anticipates your anticipation and knows your reaction before you react. She’s meticulous in the integrity of our relationship. She’s even been pivotal in helping my father and me reconcile and navigate the contours of our relationship. In the past few years, Blueprint and Don’t Die have become global phenomena. Kate is the unsung hero.  She and I have been stride on stride since inception. She’s proven an exceptional executor and despite her unconventional background, intuitively knows things. Her creativity keeps me forever guessing what she’ll say or come up with next. Our minds have become so intertwined that life feels naked without her. Her story warrants being told as others will be better off emulating her practices and abilities. What I find most impressive about Kate is her prescience and thoughtfulness. She sees forwards, backwards, and side to side. Relative to her, I feel myopic in my awareness of the world. She can see through others, as an x-ray would. She then structures all that information and can package it in simple, understandable terms. In ways that allow for everyone to win. Kate is soft spoken, self-deprecating and understated. These attributes cloak her ferocious ambition, piercing intellect, and delightful creativity. Give her five minutes and she will reframe your world. But most people don’t know to look. They assume she’s my assistant. It’s such a loss because people are looking for what she has to offer. My son Talmage, Kate, and I are family. Nothing makes us happier than being together. Our conversations are fast, dark, and rowdy. Family feeds the soul, and we are nourished. As my son considers possible partners, he wisely models them off of Kate. Deep companionship is a universal human want.  And while there are eight billion of us on this planet, most struggle to achieve it, including those in relationships. It’s the most fulfilling of human experiences and also the most elusive. The joy of being seen, appreciated and loved, and offering the same to another. I wrote dozens of different sentences trying to capture what the want and struggle for deep companionship feels like. I deleted them all as none could holistically capture the emotional architecture of it. Then one day while exercising, I realized what it feels like: what the explorer Ernest Shackleton and his crew must have felt returning to land after being shipwrecked and surviving 497 days adrift in brutal Antarctic. It’s a bit of a dramatic comparison, however, I suspect many of you can relate. Kate feels like land to me after being adrift and searching for 25 years. Life sinks or sails based upon the quality of our most intimate relationships. No amount of professional success can plug the sinking hole of an acrimonious personal relationship. At this point, Kate and I have nearly become one person. We have entire conversations with a single look, sound, gesture or image. We independently come up with the same ideas and insights, suggesting to me that maybe it’s our tandem effort generating them. Our relationship is stable, positive, and calm. I’ve wanted this my entire life and impatiently waited 25 years for it to arrive. It’s better than anything I imagined. Lucky me, I found my Abigail Adams.

English
0
0
1
69
Carter retweetledi
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Ilya and I are predicting the same future. @ilyasut predicts that as AI becomes viscerally powerful, humans will change in unprecedented ways. I’ve been arguing the same. We are not open to radical change yet because we cannot feel the pressure of AI. Once we do, the vectors for human evolution will blow open. I have been building the prototype for this adaptation and opening. He argues that as risk rises, rivals will begin cooperating on safety. I’ve argued the same. As the stakes become existential, the game shifts from dominance maximizing to minimizing death risk (survival). We will rebuild our values around this logic. IIya suggests our alignment goal must be "sentient existence" rather than human control. I've argued the same. Control is a fragile illusion, a point @karpathy recently echoed regarding the difficulty of managing emergent systems. The only robust alignment target is existence itself. The new archetype is not the Conqueror, but the Warrior & Caretaker of Existence. Finally, Ilya suggests companies need a "short list of ideas" to guide them through the chaos. A code of moral clarity. This is the Don't Die philosophy.
English
250
332
3.9K
567.9K