Troy W Johnson retweetledi
Troy W Johnson
93 posts

Troy W Johnson
@speedworks1
Family, Faith, Austrian economics, BTC
Wisconsin, USA Katılım Kasım 2013
1.6K Takip Edilen740 Takipçiler

@FindJimClair Denver is treating you well Jim - you look great!
Love the gym!
English

I took 575lbs out for a ride to test the new home gym. It's nearly complete, a few more items and some organizing remains. Not seen, the Rogue Echo bike and the Rogue sled.
I'm eeking back into heavier weights after shedding 30lbs and being a new dad.
Also tested, the Rogue AGGRO 3X bar, the sharpest knurl on market.
I love the @thestrength_co plates, hands down the best plates.
I call this gym @TestifySC west.
English
Troy W Johnson retweetledi

No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.”
Until now.
Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions.
Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.”
It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years.
And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this.
This isn’t “turning his back.”
This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies.
You want the special relationship?
Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons.
Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have.
The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year.
Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure.
Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian.
You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy.
Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes.
We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something.
In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion.
Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact.
You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power.
Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer.
He sees what you refuse to admit:
the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945.
It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated.
We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves.
Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing.
The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality.
And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other.
Look into it.
💀⚖️🗡️
The Economist@TheEconomist
No British government has ever imagined that an American president might turn his back on the special relationship between both nations. Until now econ.st/3OZceLM Illustration: Mona Eing & Michael Meissner
English

@Jethroe111 This is exceptionally well said George! After five and only two converts - I’ve nearly given up.
English

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times."
A Tale of Two Cities
I'm trying to understand and accept something.
Let me ask you this.
How many people in the world do you think actually hold Bitcoin in self custody?
How many people have ANY kind of exposure through 401k's, ETF's ?
I'm talking retail. The everyday man or woman going through this journey called life.
I believe it's tens of millions at most. At most.
Out of 8 billion people.
I've spent many years now telling our kids-we have a lot-about Bitcoin. None of them got it. Only one son-in-law took a chance. But he doesn't really understand it. He just took a chance.
I've sat next to a friend every year for 7 years, a campfire between us deep in the woods, and had deep conversations about money. Bitcoin.
Crickets.
Michael Saylor @saylor basically said he's spent a thousand hours talking Bitcoin and questioned how many he actually onboarded.
His conclusion? Hours and hours with a small return.
Yet he has the world flocking to a derivative product; a credit instrument $STRC built on top of Bitcoin. And this is the future he sees.
Paper on top of Bitcoin that Strategy holds. Not plebs.
This last 2 years have not been about retail. It's institutions. Credit products. Derivatives. ETF's. MSTR.
When I say, "Lonely are the Brave" I mean it. Those of you that actually hold Bitcoin in self custody are few and far between.
So I salute you, fellow pleb.
Keep stacking like a smart psychopath.
HODL.
And I'll see you on the other side of this Fourth Turning.
We will be Legends.

English

@HBS_Eric Wait and see how this goes for Spain. I predict - not well. Cheers
English


@FindJimClair This is awesome congrats - your holidays are forever changed for the better!
English

@LawrenceLepard Your book is very well done Larry - I gave several copies to my family members. Let’s hope they consume it!
English
Troy W Johnson retweetledi
Troy W Johnson retweetledi
Troy W Johnson retweetledi
Troy W Johnson retweetledi

Ten bad takeaways from the Zelenskyy blow-up
1. Zelenskyy does not grasp—or deliberately ignores—the bitter truth: those with whom he feels most affinity (Western globalists, the American Left, the Europeans) have little power in 2025 to help him. And those with whom he obviously does not like or seeks to embarrass (cf. his Scranton, Penn. campaign-like visit in September 2024) alone have the power to save him. For his own sake, I hope he is not being “briefed” by the Obama-Clinton-Biden gang to confront Trump, given their interests are not really Ukraine’s as they feign.
2. Zelenskyy acts as if his agendas and ours are identical. So, he keeps insisting that he is fighting for us despite our two-ocean-distance that he mocks. We do have many shared interests with Ukraine, but not all by any means: Trump wants to “reset” with Russia and triangulate it against China. He seeks to avoid a 1962 DEFCON 2-like crisis over a proxy showdown in proximity to a nuclear rival. And he sincerely wants to end the deadlocked Stalingrad slaughterhouse for everyone’s sake.
3. The Europeans (and Canada) are now talking loudly of a new muscular antithesis, independent of the U.S. Promises, promises—given that would require Europeans to prune back their social welfare state, frack, use nuclear, stop the green obsessions, and spend 3-5 percent of their GDP on defense. The U.S. does not just pay 16 percent of NATO’s budget but also puts up with asymmetrical tariffs that result in a European Union trade surplus of $160 billion, plays the world cop patrolling sea-lanes and deterring terrorists and rogues states that otherwise might interrupt Europe’s commercial networks abroad, as well as de facto including Europe under a nuclear umbrella of 6,500 nukes.
4. Zelenskyy must know that all of the once deal-stopping issues to peace have been de facto settled: Ukraine is now better armed than most NATO nations, but will not be in NATO; and no president has or will ever supply Ukraine with the armed wherewithal to take back the Donbass and Crimea. So, the only two issues are a) how far will Putin be willing to withdraw to his 2022 borders and b) how will he be deterred? The first is answered by a commercial sector/tripwire, joint Ukrainian-US-Europe resource development corridor in Eastern Ukraine, coupled with a Korea-like DMZ; the second by the fact that Putin unlike his 2008 and 2014 invasions has now lost a million dead and wounded to a Ukraine that will remain thusly armed.
5. What are Zelenskyy’s alternatives without much U.S. help—wait for a return of the Democrats to the White House in four years? Hope for a rearmed Europe? Pray for a Democratic House and a 3rd Vindman-like engineered Trump impeachment? Or swallow his pride, return to the White House, sign the rare-earth minerals deal, invite in the Euros (are they seriously willing to patrol a DMZ?), and hope Trump can warn Putin, as he did successfully between 2017-21, not to dare try it again?
6. If there is a cease fire, a commercial deal, a Euro ground presence, and influx of Western companies into Ukraine, would there be elections? And if so, would Zelenskyy and his party win? And if not, would there be a successor transparent government that would reveal exactly where all the Western financial aid money went?
7. Zelenskyy might see a model in Netanyahu. The Biden Administration was far harder on him than Trump is on Ukraine: suspending arms shipments, demanding cease-fires, prodding for a wartime, bipartisan cabinet, hammering Israel on collateral damage—none of which Westerners have demanded of Zelenskyy. Yet Netanyahu managed a hostile Biden, kept Israel close to its patron, and when visiting was gracious to his host. Netanyahu certainly would never before the global media have interrupted, and berated a host and patron president in the White House.
8. If Ukraine has alienated the U.S. what then is its strategic victory plan? Wait around for more Euros? Hold off an increasingly invigorated Russian military? Cede more territory? What, then, exactly are Zelenskyy’s cards he seems to think are a winning hand?
9. If one views carefully all the 50-minute tape, most of it was going quite well—until Zelenskyy started correcting Vance firstly, and Trump secondly. By Ukraine-splaining to his hosts, and by his gestures, tone, and interruptions, he made it clear that he assumed that Trump was just more of the same compliant, clueless moneybags Biden waxen effigy. And that was naïve for such a supposedly worldly leader.
10. March 2025 is not March 2022, after the heroic saving of Kyiv—but three years and 1.5 million dead and wounded later. Zelenskyy is no longer the international heartthrob with the glamorous entourage. He has postponed elections, outlawed opposition media and parties, suspended habeas corpus and walked out of negotiations when he had an even hand in Spring 2022 and apparently even now when he does not in Spring 2025.
Quo vadis, Volodymyr?
English
Troy W Johnson retweetledi

@LawrenceLepard Love it Larry - can’t wait to consume this one
English
Troy W Johnson retweetledi
Troy W Johnson retweetledi

"Find something that is inevitable but not yet obvious."
Bitcoin is inevitable.
But it's not obvious to the tech money.
Jason is busy trying to poke holes in MSTR.
Chamath sold his BTC long ago.
Elon is barely interested.
Bezos hasn't said a word.
It's also not not obvious to wall street.
CNBC basically thinks it a ponzi.
Jamie thinks it's a pet rock.
Buffet thinks it's rat poison squared.
Vanguard won't carry it.
So 99% of the big money still hasn't figured it out.
But nobody stops the train.
Inevitable but not yet obvious.
Thats how you make big money.
English
Troy W Johnson retweetledi











