A

434 posts

A banner
A

A

@spinachyolk

🇮🇪 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Play wid dat pussy

Katılım Şubat 2025
391 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
A
A@spinachyolk·
@Polly888888 @trussliz Jewish oligarchy enabled by Christian zionist Telegraph feminists. It is all about to come crashing down.
English
0
0
0
14
A retweetledi
Polly
Polly@Polly888888·
@trussliz Blair and Brown worked with Soros from May 1997 which is how Soros 'captured Britain'. Open Society London was later set up as Soros' UK manager. Seven pals of Soros were behind the CCA. Soros' Institute for New Economic Thinking is now in HM Treasury thanks to Torsten Bell.
Polly tweet mediaPolly tweet mediaPolly tweet mediaPolly tweet media
English
21
260
378
14.9K
A retweetledi
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost@Ne_pas_couvrir·
Did you know that England once had a deeply rooted civilian gun culture, stretching from the 1500s into the early twentieth century, and that this English tradition helped shape the American right to keep and bear arms? For centuries, English law and custom treated the armed citizen as a normal part of a free society. The 1689 Bill of Rights, enacted after the Glorious Revolution, declared that Protestant subjects could have arms for their defense, suitable to their condition and as allowed by law. That language reflected older English assumptions rather than creating something wholly new. Under the militia tradition, able-bodied men were long expected to possess arms for the defense of the realm, and by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries firearms were widely available to ordinary civilians with relatively little state interference. Guns could be bought in shops, advertised openly, and acquired with few of the licensing burdens that later became standard. For much of this period, England did not treat civilian gun ownership as suspicious. It treated it as normal. That inheritance mattered in America. The American founders drew heavily from English common law, Blackstone, and the broader Anglo political tradition, including the 1689 Bill of Rights. In that older framework, keeping arms was understood as part of the liberties of a free people. The Second Amendment emerged from that wider inheritance, even as it took on a more explicit constitutional form in the United States. Britain’s sharp break with this older tradition came after the First World War. Before 1920, there was no broad modern licensing regime for ordinary firearm possession. The postwar period changed that. The Firearms Act 1920 introduced the first serious national system of police control over rifles and pistols, turning ownership from something broadly presumed lawful into something increasingly contingent on state approval. The reasons were political as much as criminal. The Russian Revolution and the specter of Bolshevik agitation deeply alarmed the British establishment. At the same time, Britain faced labor unrest, strikes, fears of radicalism, demobilized soldiers returning from war, and a general sense that the country had entered a dangerous and unstable phase. Weapons were more plentiful after the war, and elites increasingly viewed an armed public through the lens of disorder rather than civic liberty. Immigration and postwar racial tensions formed an important part of that climate. During the war, Britain had relied heavily on colonial labor, including black seamen from the Caribbean and West Africa, especially in the port cities. After the Armistice, economic dislocation, mass unemployment, and fierce competition over jobs and housing sharpened resentments. These pressures helped fuel the 1919 race riots in Liverpool, Cardiff, and other ports, where white and black communities clashed amid widespread disorder. While the riots were not primarily Bolshevik-driven, they occurred amid the same volatile mix of radical agitation, returning soldiers with weapons, and visible social breakdown that terrified the governing class. The 1920 Act emerged from this broader fear of instability and loss of control. A similar pattern of social anxiety appeared again after 1945. Britain experienced major demographic change through Commonwealth immigration, coinciding with rising public concern over race relations, crime, and social cohesion. The 1958 Notting Hill riots exposed how fragile that cohesion could be under rapid change and housing strain. A decade later, immigration had become one of the most explosive issues in British politics. Enoch Powell’s 1968 “Rivers of Blood” speech captured those anxieties. In that same charged atmosphere, the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1968 further restricted entry. It was in this wider climate of unease that tighter firearms law became politically easier to justify. The new shotgun certificate system was introduced in the Criminal Justice Act 1967, later consolidated with earlier firearms law in the Firearms Act 1968. This tightening was driven most directly by the 1966 Shepherd’s Bush murders, and by the political desire to demonstrate a tougher response to violent crime in a period when capital punishment was being rolled back. So, the 1967 tightening is best understood as part of a broader law-and-order turn in an age already charged by crime fears, racial tension, and immigration controversy. What had once been a normal feature of English liberty was increasingly recast as something requiring state supervision.
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost tweet media
English
217
1.1K
4K
596.3K
A
A@spinachyolk·
@DrDominicGreen @moveincircles @DavidBe31099196 I agree. Jews aren't, in the UK at least. I think most will have to stick with whites or make aliya at some point. But I do think most conflict will be between non natives. The English, Welsh and Scottish will huddle and wall off. I already know a few Poles who have gone home.
English
0
0
0
33
Dominic Green
Dominic Green@DrDominicGreen·
@moveincircles @DavidBe31099196 This is broadly true, but regarding this case: how are British Jews, who are disproportionately attacked, 'attacking' members of any other group?
English
2
0
21
792
A
A@spinachyolk·
Shia defence@Shiahadithdaily

Aisha was approximately 22 years old when the Prophet married her, even based on an analysis of Sunni narrations themselves, without even needing to refer to Shia sources. It's the radical Sunnis who insist on claiming she was 6 or 9, simply because that fabrication is found in their so-called "Sahih" Bukhari and Muslim. They cling to it just to avoid being exposed. How Old Was A’yshah When She Married The Prophet Muhammad? (14 Minute read) Author: Ayatullah Muhammad Husayn Husayni al-Qazwini (Vali-Asr Institute) Translated by: Abu Noora al-Tabrizi. Ahl al-Sunnah insist on proving that A’yshah was betrothed to the Prophet Muhammad (S) at six years of age and that she entered his house at nine years [where the marriage was consummated]. [Ahl al-Sunnah] consider this to be evidence for A’yshah’s superiority over the other wives of the Messenger of Allah. Does this, however, reflect reality? In the following article we will investigate this matter. However, before embarking on the crux of the matter, we must shed light on the history of the Prophet’s marriage to A’yshah so that we may afterwards draw a conclusion as to how old she was when she married the Messenger of Allah. There are differing views in regard to the history of the Messenger of Allah’s marriage to A’yshah. Muhammad b. Ismaʿil al-Bukhari [d. 256 A.H/870 C.E] narrates from A’yshah herself that the Messenger of Allah betrothed her three years after [the death] of Lady Khadijah (Allah’s peace be upon her): حدثنا قُتَيْبَةُ بن سَعِيدٍ حدثنا حُمَيْدُ بن عبد الرحمن عن هِشَامِ بن عُرْوَةَ عن أبيه عن عَائِشَةَ رضي الله عنها قالت ما غِرْتُ على امْرَأَةٍ ما غِرْتُ على خَدِيجَةَ من كَثْرَةِ ذِكْرِ رسول اللَّهِ (ص) إِيَّاهَا قالت وَتَزَوَّجَنِي بَعْدَهَا بِثَلَاثِ سِنِينَ وَأَمَرَهُ رَبُّهُ عز وجل أو جِبْرِيلُ عليه السَّلَام أَنْ يُبَشِّرَهَا بِبَيْتٍ في الْجَنَّةِ من قَصَبٍ. It has been narrated by ʿA’yshah (may Allah be pleased with her) [where] she said: “I have not been jealous of any woman as I have with Khadijah. [This is because first], the Messenger of Allah (S) would mention her a lot”. [Second], she said: “he married me three years after her [death] and [third], his Lord (Exalted is He!) or [the archangel] Jibril (peace be upon him) commanded him to bless her with a house in heaven made out of reed (qasab).” See: al-Bukhari al-Juʿfi, Muhammad b. Ismaʿil Abu ʿAbd Allah (d. 256 A.H/870 C.E), Sahih al-Bukhari, ed. Mustafa Dib al-Bagha (Dar ibn Kathir: Beirut, 3rd print, 1407 /1987), III: 3606, hadith # 3606. Kitab Fadha’il al-Sahabah [The Book of the Merits of the Companions], Bab Tazwij al-Nabi Khadijah wa Fadhliha radhi Allah ʿanha [Chapter on the Marriage of The Prophet to Khadijah and her Virtue[s] (may Allah be pleased with her)]. Given that Lady Khadija (Allah’s peace be upon her) left this world during the tenth year of the Prophetic mission (biʿthah), the Messenger of Allah’s marriage with A’yshah therefore took place during the thirteenth year of the Prophetic mission. After having narrated al-Bukhari’s tradition, Ibn al-Mulqin derives the following from the narration: وبنى بها بالمدينة في شوال في السنة الثانية . …and the Prophet (S) consummated the marriage in Madinah during [the month] of Shawwal in the second year [of the Hijrah]. See: al-Ansari al-Shafiʿi, Siraj al-Din Abi Hafs ʿUmar b. ʿAli b. Ahmad al-Maʿruf bi Ibn al-Mulqin (d. 804 A.H/1401 C.E), Ghayat al-Sul fi Khasa’is al-Rasul (S), ed. ʿAbd Allah Bahr al-Din ʿAbd Allah (Dar al-Basha’ir al-Islamiyah: Beirut, 1414/1993), I: 236. According to this narration, the Messenger of Allah betrothed A’yshah in the thirteenth year of the Prophetic mission and officially wed her [i.e. consummated the marriage] in the second year of the Hijrah. (Continued below)

QME
1
0
0
34
A
A@spinachyolk·
@moveincircles @DavidBe31099196 whites will stay on the periphery. Might even be a good opportunity for us to get together and wall ourselves off. They won't be able to blame colonisers forever
English
0
0
0
22
A
A@spinachyolk·
@moveincircles @DavidBe31099196 When I used to live in London most ethnic clashes I saw were between blacks and Asians. Remember the incident in Peckham between the Asian shopkeeper and black lady, and then the Post-it protests after blaming white supremacy? Lmao. That's the future I see
English
1
0
0
59
A retweetledi
Museum
Museum@DailyClassicArt·
Caspar David Friedrich - "Solitary Tree" (1822)
Museum tweet media
English
2
80
518
8.2K
A retweetledi
Zoomer
Zoomer@ZoomerHistorian·
Just randomly remembered that people are actually calling a bloke called ‘Gout Gout’ Australian and burst out laughing
English
25
51
2.9K
21.8K
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
Academic Agent
Academic Agent@AcademicAgent_X·
The rightoid is incapable of strategy or reason. He is reflexively feminine and emotional. This is why he is repeatedly conned and fleeced.
English
12
46
386
7K
ManifestChud
ManifestChud@manifestchud·
Just look at the reaction to the British Restore Party announcing it will go after Islamic Terrorists, the second you focus on the actual problem (Islam/those “people” generally) they get into a hissy fit about “THE JEWS” “Wait you want to deport Islamic Terrorists? Well unless you deport EVERY JEWISH person this is clearly a PsyOp by Israel!”
ManifestChud tweet media
English
2
1
28
1.5K
Læwis
Læwis@Laewis_Muun·
@AcademicAgent_X Are you retarded? How the fuck is a Latino a Spainaird? WTF are you on drugs?
English
1
0
11
451
Academic Agent
Academic Agent@AcademicAgent_X·
Why does Spain have such high migration and where are all the immigrants from? Morocco: 1.17 million Colombia: 978,000 Venezuela: 692,000 Romania: 521,000 Ecuador: 469,000 So if you consider 2.1 million Latinos going "back to Spain", it looks a bit different.
English
91
11
289
66.5K
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
Museum
Museum@DailyClassicArt·
Oswald Achenbach - "In the park by the fountain of Villa Torlonia in Frascati" (1881)
Museum tweet media
English
2
46
275
5.5K
A retweetledi
Jody McIntyre
Jody McIntyre@jodymcintyre_·
EXCLUSIVE: I have uncovered evidence suggesting that Labour Together, the think tank of Morgan McSweeney fame, is now being led by a former IDF soldier. This information does not appear on his Wikipedia page or in ANY recent articles. I cannot believe Labour have hidden this:🧵
Jody McIntyre tweet media
English
128
4.6K
8.3K
276.5K
A
A@spinachyolk·
@JediSwampOgre @JaydaBF It's like Christians are intentionality trying to make Christianity look like slop I really can't get my head around it but it's so over
English
1
0
0
34
Kumshot
Kumshot@JediSwampOgre·
@JaydaBF Islam just gets stronger because these Jew tricks don’t work on us. They hypnotised Christian. Destroyed Christianity within 2 generations. That’s why you mock. You are jealous of the fact we have REAL faith. Our mosques are full no matter how may we build.
English
2
1
9
211