Springbok Finance

84 posts

Springbok Finance banner
Springbok Finance

Springbok Finance

@springbok_fin

Thematic research and stock deep dives. Finding outliers in a sea of noise. Join us at Substack for free! 👇

Katılım Şubat 2026
72 Takip Edilen24 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
4% of public companies have generated 100% of net U.S. stock market wealth since 1926. The other 96%? They returned no more than a one-month T-bill. Most investors are diversifying across a graveyard and calling it a portfolio. The real risk isn't volatility - it’s owning the 96%. (1/5) 🧵
English
1
1
4
307
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
1 GW is a lot! They are getting ~$2B each year from MSFT on 200MW. From $6B dilution they can get another deal worth $2B annually. Further expansion will obviously require more cash, which will come through contract fulfillment, contract prepayments of new deals, more debt, and further stock dilution.
English
0
0
0
10
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Do you guys think there’s only $5,650,000,000 dilution to go with $IREN? Very surprising that people haven’t switched to $NBIS or other names if you’re long Neoclouds. One already has confirmed funding with $NVDA + convertibles from institutions. The other is likely actively selling new shares on the open market to get funding off retail shareholders. The sad reality is: $IREN simply cannot monetize the rest of their capacity without using that. It’s not “optionality”. Financial structure nuance matters when you’re choosing winners for equity appreciation. Nebius is clearly has the better financing structure and this is already showing up in YTD returns.
Serenity tweet mediaSerenity tweet media
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

$IREN filed to dilute $6,000,000,000 at a $11.7B MC. That is not noise. This is Iren's way to monetize their 4.5GW capacity by selling all those new shares onto the open market. If you want some history on how this turns out: Look at $BKKT that crashed 99% with Mike and $IREN board of directors history with excessive ATMs. Or his recent company $ASST. It’s accretive to the company and executives: Because it wipes out all retail shareholders and they can always issue SBC. So they don’t actually care what stock price it needs to be at to sell. After they’re finished, they have $6B in new cash to use for scaling without paying interest. But the reason why convertible notes with interest, and $NVDA funding balance sheets is much better for retail capital: Is because it doesn’t wipe out retail equity to achieve this. Because at this point $IREN looks like the $AMC of datacenters with a dwindling moat, and looming $6B in shares sold into the open market. Reason I post about $IREN is because - people dismiss a $6B ATM as “Noise” - it’s one of the most popular retail “buy the dip” companies that they’re buying into a $6B dilution machine - people still don’t understand the risk at all. - the amount they have now is not enough to finance GPUs/GW capacity monetization. - they likely will have to use the ATM, it’s not “optionality” Again: I have zero positions in the company. I’m just warning retail investors that this ATM structurally wipes out your equity appreciation by how structural mechanics of $6B+ ATMs work. Because $IREN likely needs to sell new shares at any price to monetize their GW, otherwise there would be zero need to file it. Executives actually don't need to care because they can make up for stock price dropping by issuing SBC like $SNAP. If you have to wonder if your equity gets wiped out from an excessive ATM: There are better longs out there than $IREN.

English
60
15
287
88.7K
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
@_melonBird @aleabitoreddit I don't think you know much about Iren. They already had $5.5B out of $5.8B capex financed before announcing $6B dilution. So why did they do the dilution? For future deals which will be announced. And yes, the prepayments will help further.
English
1
0
0
24
Daniel Romero
Daniel Romero@HyperTechInvest·
At this pace, $MU will buy back the entire company by 2027
Daniel Romero tweet media
English
21
9
217
22.1K
Grummz
Grummz@Grummz·
Sam Altman signed DRAM deals he can't pay for as his Stargate datacenters get axed and investors pull out. DRAM prices have stopped spiking. It's a jinx to mess with gamers.
Grummz tweet mediaGrummz tweet media
English
53
132
2.1K
62.4K
SixSigmaCapital
SixSigmaCapital@SixSigmaCapital·
Whats the situation with $MU has come in a lot post ER, anyone with strong views? Buying or selling?
English
26
1
51
18.8K
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
Three true stories. A ship sinks in 1912. The market prices the exact uninsured loss to the dollar. A nuclear weapons programme in 1954. An economist reads stock prices and uncovers a classified state secret. His paper is confiscated and destroyed. A space shuttle disaster in 1986. The market identifies the responsible company in hours. Six months before any official investigation. The stock market is not just a place to buy and sell shares. It is the world's largest information processing machine. And sometimes, it knows things it should not. Full article below. springbokfinance.substack.com/p/offbeat-the-…
English
0
0
0
24
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
@aleabitoreddit Cannot even call what you are facing as accusation. That is just plain stupid. Fin bloggers job is to make you returns and not show off how much money they made
English
2
0
1
370
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
I don’t post USD values of positions from $RDDT to $CRCL since they’re irrelevant. What matters are the core thesis/ideas: The % outcome in the market validates them, not the size of a portfolio and USD values going up a lot (like .01% of $10M). I’ve said this before as well to any small X content creator who gets made fun of because of a $5K port or $25K port. They should be listened to as well for their ideas, not how much money they have. It’s the same reason I don’t cite my background in RISC-V to publishing papers in AI Labs when I post a thesis: They’re based on the core idea. Not authority. All the endless noise ended up getting to my head so I gave in once posting $SIVE figures. Substance is what matters and I think that’s largely why my account got such a huge following recently. And I encourage others to focus on that as well.
Serenity tweet media
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

I just bought ~.5%-1% of $SIVE as a company. I said their future CW laser chokepoint is grossly mispriced. And I put my money where my mouth is. Especially when they're the confirmed light source for Jabil, $MRVL Celestial, O-Net, and other hyperscalers.

English
32
9
412
95.8K
Norveçli
Norveçli@norveclifinance·
Let’s look at Micron with actual data: March 11 Short: 26.56% → $MU +4.7% March 13 Short: 28.12% → $MU +5.1% March 16 Short: 27.81% → $MU +3.6% March 17 Short: 29.74% → $MU +4.5% Clear so far: low short = strong upside. Then everything changed: March 19 Short: 44.95% → $MU -3.7% (despite strong earnings) March 20 Short: 41.37% → $MU -4.8% March 23 Short: 41.43% → $MU -4.3% March 24 Short: 42.18% → $MU -2.1% March 25 Short: 42.87% → $MU -3.4% From 26.56% → 42.87% +16.31 pts ~61% increase in short pressure The pattern is obvious: Low short → natural price action High short → aggressive suppression This is not normal selling. This is pressure using borrowed shares. But there’s a second phase: Those shares must be bought back. When that happens, the move higher won’t be gradual. It can be violent. $MU #Micron #ShortSqueeze #AI #Semiconductors #HBM #Memory #Stocks #Investing #StockMarket #WallStreet
Norveçli tweet media
English
14
14
143
21.3K
Julien | Tech & Invests
Julien | Tech & Invests@JulienTechInvst·
Seeing Sandisk $SNDK, Western Digital $WDC and Micron $MU as the top 3 worst performing stocks of the day (likely due to Google recent publication) makes me think the market understands nothing about semiconductors… Sandisk and Western Digital are indeed memory makers, but they provide NAND and Google’s research paper is on KV-cache which has nothing to di with NAND. Micron dumping is not surprising (panic sell), but the other 2 going down because of this news is stupid. Anyway, this strengthen my confidence in saying there is information asymmetry to exploit with such incompetence…
tae kim@firstadopter

👀 $INTC $AMD

English
19
6
148
33.3K
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
@TradexWhisperer So if the chip gets destroyed faster, it means the demand will increase, as they will be needed to be replaced more quickly. And as the demand for chip rises, so does demand for HBMs.
English
0
0
0
246
Trade Whisperer
Trade Whisperer@TradexWhisperer·
$MU $SNDK This is actually pretty bad Google TurboQuant destroys your chips 57% faster due to immense stress on Compute. Cuts lifespan from 7 years to 3. Then add liquid cooling and energy bills. Free lunch. Right. Gemini 3 did the math 👇
Trade Whisperer tweet media
Trade Whisperer@TradexWhisperer

$MU $SNDK Let me expose the REAL downsides of Google TurboQuant Compression for you: Google's TurboQuant has big downsides. It uses more GPU power and energy. The bill shows up in four places: power, latency, logic, and quotas. GPU Power. The compression doesn't eliminate compute, it shifts it. Your GPU has to do extra work to pack and unpack vectors on every single read. Net result: higher energy consumption per inference, not lower. Latency. Saving VRAM sounds great until you see the Time to First Token spike. Unlike raw 16-bit memory where the GPU just reads data, TurboQuant requires mathematical transformations before the model can generate a single word. Gemini 3.1 Pro users are already reporting 60-90 second thinking loops on simple queries. It's not stuck. It's decompressing. Streaming. Text no longer flows word by word. Decompression happens in chunks. The UI freezes for 10 seconds, then dumps 200 words at once. Conversational feel is gone. Logic. TurboQuant is lossless for retrieval, not for reasoning. In complex coding or math, 3-bit quantization loses the subtle data spikes that represent edge-case logic. Great at summarizing a 100-page PDF. Hallucinate a library name in a Python script because that token's precision was compressed away. Quotas. Deep Thinking mode consumes more internal compute cycles, not less. Users are hitting quota limits after three messages. Some are getting 24-hour lockouts. No free lunch.

English
40
44
398
111.5K
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@Mr_Derivatives·
The 17 largest companies and their 2027 Forward P/E estimate. Hard to say it’s a bubble when a lot of them are in the teens…
Heisenberg tweet media
English
153
202
1.6K
272.1K
Springbok Finance
Springbok Finance@springbok_fin·
@pdicarlotrader Let me ask you something - If $MU simply gets $500B in donations tomorrow, will you still stock to your technical analysis or follow fundamentals?
English
2
0
0
637
Peter DiCarlo
Peter DiCarlo@pdicarlotrader·
I’m still not buying $MU up here ❌ Yes, earnings and guidance were great. But my bull cycle model says this move is 6x longer and 2x bigger than the average run, and price is stretched far above fair value. In this video I break down why I’m waiting for 300–320.
English
59
21
349
107.4K