Buzzer
25.8K posts





Islam is not the problem of the world. Terrorism is a problem. Extremism is a problem. Corrupt governments are a problem. War is a problem. Poverty is a problem. But blaming 2 billion Muslims for the actions of a tiny minority is not intelligence. It's prejudice.

What if it turns out a lot of viruses and tick- and flea-borne diseases originated in a lab? Reasonable question. The US has been weaponizing parasites for decades. More background here: fullmeasure.news/newest-videos/…






🚨 THE PUBLIC ISN'T BUYING IT ANYMORE Mass migration is not a policy failure. I believe it is a policy choice and its by design. For decades, Western governments have ignored public opposition, weakened borders, expanded migration and then attacked, censored or demonised those who object. At some point, people have to stop asking whether this is incompetence. And start asking whether it is intentional. National identity. National sovereignty. Strong borders. Cultural cohesion. These are obstacles to the kind of global political One World Order many elites appear to favour. That is why concerns are ignored. That is why criticism is condemned. That is why censorship continues to expand. But millions of people across Europe are now asking the same question: If governments are acting in the interests of their own people, why do they keep pursuing policies that so many of their own people oppose? That question is not going away.




I cannot agree with you there Peter. In 1914 the use of blockade to deny the enemy supplies including food was a well established tactic of war since the siege of Troy to the Napoleonic wars sieges and naval blockades were common practice. The bombing of civilians and indeed the naval bombardment of civilians was carried out by Germany in the 1914/18 war. If you want to have civilised wars only then you will always have wars and people will always die in them. Alfred Nobel offered his peace prize to the inventor of the most dreadful of weapons as only by making war suicidally dangerous will mankind stop fighting them. An interesting test of this argument would be the Falklands War in 1982. We went to war because we were confident that we could win. If China had seized Hong Kong would we have invaded China? Of course not. Hopefully you see the point.

Largest turnout for any party’s national day of action in Makerfield.


Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine. In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted. odni.gov/index.php/news…































