Sadi

641 posts

Sadi banner
Sadi

Sadi

@ssmcapital

Not financial advice

Katılım Ekim 2021
63 Takip Edilen52 Takipçiler
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Trying small $ES long here. Like structure and weak $VIXY
English
0
0
0
20
JB
JB@JLikesSports·
@zerohedge That doesnt look very good, but I also have 0 idea wtf im looking at
English
1
0
3
583
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
Complete SpaceX financial spread
zerohedge tweet media
English
18
54
329
103.6K
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
That's why it is critical that you use your smallest risk unit. It also is important to identify the type of rule break. If it's something like taking a trade you have never taken before, then no. If it is edge showing up outside of a normal time frame, but everything else is clicking, it may be worth it to risk 1/10th of 1% of your account, instead of beating yourself up about it later. Really the distinction for me would be "Would I be more emotionally charged if I missed this trade and it worked, or I avoided it and it failed" -- ignoring it altogether may cause other issues to leak out into your trading
English
1
0
0
210
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
2 lies and one truth. $VX down, $ES $NQ down, equities $NVDA, $AMD etc down... Who is lying ?
English
0
0
0
49
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Really important read
Lance Breitstein 🇺🇸🌎@TheOneLanceB

IS YOUR TRADING EDGE-CONSTRAINED OR OPPORTUNITY-CONSTRAINED? @Hormozi always emphasizes focusing on the #1 constraint in your business. Most businesses are either demand-constrained or supply-constrained, and whichever constraint you have determines your entire strategy. If you don’t have demand, you focus on marketing and sales. If you don’t have supply, you focus on supply chain and operations. Ok, Lance… how does this apply to trading? Trading works the exact same way, but I’ve never see anyone frame it like this: you are either edge-constrained or opportunity-constrained, and your results are determined by which constraint you attack. The problem is most traders misdiagnose themselves, so they spend years solving the wrong problem. If you don’t have a proven edge, you are edge-constrained. That means your job is not to trade more, not to scan more markets, and definitely not to take more setups hoping something sticks. Your job is to backtest, collect data, refine execution rules, and build a playbook that has real statistical backing, because without edge the more you trade the more you lose, and every hour spent hunting new opportunities is just accelerating drawdown. Edge-constrained traders should be obsessed with proof and data. Until you can say with high certainty that your setup produces positive expectancy over hundreds of trades, nothing else matters, because you cannot scale something that has negative expected value. Now flip it. If you have a proven edge and a defined playbook, you’re no longer edge-constrained. You’re opportunity-constrained, and now the game changes completely because the problem is no longer whether your setup works, but how often you can find and how to maximize each opportunity. Opportunity-constrained traders should not be endlessly tweaking entries or second-guessing their system. Their effort should go toward finding more of their best setups, building scanners and filters to surface them faster, expanding into other product markets where the same pattern exists, or using instruments like options to express the same idea more efficiently. Once edge is proven, growth comes from better execution, better sizing, and wider expression of that edge, not from reinventing the strategy. Most traders are trying to scale before they validate, or optimize before they prove. Identify your constraint first, because solving the wrong problem is why you feel busy but stay stuck. In trading, just like in business, the bottleneck determines the strategy, and if you attack the real constraint with full focus, progress becomes inevitable. The same is true for your trading business. And that’s why you need use your noggin to reflect and find the right advice that applies to your situation. Not blindly follow what you read.

English
0
0
0
14
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
The classic fakeout of a fakeout of a fakeout 😂😂 #ES_F $NQ_F $ES $NQ
English
0
0
0
44
Heisenberg
Heisenberg@Mr_Derivatives·
The largest aerospace and defense names: $LMT looking cheapest relatively speaking.
Heisenberg tweet media
English
39
30
283
47.5K
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Despite all the noise, this still looks good. Bulls have clear control and we are trending at all time highs. Bullish! $NQ $ES $ES_F $NQ_F $QQQ $SPY
Sadi tweet media
English
0
0
2
77
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Started building this last night and got a pretty good foundation by today. Goal is to have this done for @BillAckman @TheOneLanceB and maybe a couple others -- basically trying to understand their mental models and have a database of trades to study. @TheShortBear was victim #1 due to the scope of what he explores. Super excited to dive in. Side note: claude code is cracked
Sadi tweet media
English
0
0
0
23
Sadi retweetledi
van00sa
van00sa@van00sa·
Robinhood agreed to a $2 million settlement for misleading you about how it makes money. The firm they were routing your orders to this whole time was Jane Street. Jane Street paid Robinhood $76 million in a single quarter for the right to be on the other side of your trades. Every time you hit buy or sell, your order gets routed directly to them before it ever reaches an open market. Your cut in the settlement to make things right: $17.60 That’s just for trades from 2016. Not a bad fee considering they can continue to do this today There was a rule that would’ve fixed this. The SEC’s order competition rule would’ve forced your trades into open auction before any wholesaler could touch them. Estimated savings for retail would have been $1.5 billion/year. The new SEC chair killed this in June 2025. It didn’t need a vote or public input, it was just withdrawn. You thought you had a free trading app but everything comes at a cost
English
257
1.1K
5.8K
435.6K
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
@TheShortBear Will you be focusing on private plays or public? Names like VRT have had their moment it seems like. Of course higher is possible but its hard coming to the game this late. On the private side there is Skyfire, but how do you get in when you are not an accredited investor?
English
0
0
0
23
THE SHORT BEAR
THE SHORT BEAR@TheShortBear·
Just wanted to say that you will see me repost and post sometimes incomplete thoughts as I we push towards the new era of commerce and intelligence. The new world is slowly emerging build through web3 rails, AI and AI agents and lastly through Agentic Robotics. As we build this world many adjacent themes will be approached and traded over the next few years. (Picture Energy, Resources, Rails and alike.) Many of the technologies and systems will be see as normal down the line are currently being built. Logically as people race to build through AI and build a lot of the new infrastructure, they are incomplete and many will not be able to survive the competition as their moats get disrupted by the next vibe coder. That said the visions and projects are real and my main mission is to partake in sharing the innovation and what this new world will look like. My main approach will be to partake in the beta of this era by betting on the infrastructure needed for Agentic web3 to flourish. I might not know what exact companies and projects will work, probably through maximizing the network effects, switching costs and alike, but I have a way better grasp about which players will make it possible for them to scale and prosper. I can’t tell you which high speed tps will win, but I know which is most secure and used. I might not know which coding platform will survive, but I know which energy source they’ll use. During ultra high growth phases around new technologies, I try and remain calm and think about the bottlenecks. What are non-negotiables for this future to happen. That’s what my time is spent on. The rest of my time is spend optimizing my process. Full backtesting platform, note taking, trade logs automated and analysed, new bots, new AI Assistent and alike. Moving with the times.
English
16
6
244
22.8K
Sadi retweetledi
Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD
Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD@houmanhemmati·
‼️ WHOA! Silicon Valley “tax the rich” congressman @RoKhanna becomes the first Democrat to ADMIT California has $72 BILLION in criminal fraud, calls for “full accountability” & “new leadership”. Trouble for @GavinNewsom presidential ambitions. Now that you agree: 1. STOP asking for new taxes until the fraud 💸 has ENDED, money is returned, & criminal politicians are in prison. We won’t need any more money. In fact, we’ll have an enormous surplus and have to reduce taxes. 2. You’re in CONGRESS. Call for federal HEARINGS and put the leadership you mention - including @CAgovernor Newsom - UNDER OATH for the public to see. $7.2 million is egregious. $72 million should cause heads to roll. $72 BILLION is unconscionable and should cause a TOTAL REBOOT OF CALIFORNIA — leadership, taxes, elections, entitlements, and so much more. I’m glad you agree. Now do your job and stop asking us to feed the fraud machine with even MORE taxes. @elonmusk @chamath @Cernovich @JTLonsdale @garrytan @MarioNawfal @Jason @friedberg
Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD tweet media
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna

One place you and I probably agree @chamath & @Jason @friedberg is the $72 billion fraud in Sacramento is outrageous and appalling. There needs to be full accountability for the waste and new leadership in Sacramento. Taxpayers are owed an accounting of where every penny of their tax dollars are going --a detailed receipt.

English
118
797
2.9K
211.7K
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Any pursuit literally ever is difficult - this is beyond ignorant. I ran a family business and did the entrepreneurial route, and it was miserable in its own way. 'Golden handcuffs'. Now I'm getting my MBA at an expensive school and I decided to finance most of it. That pressure with networking in this job market freaking sucks - a different level of hard + two years of my life I might never get back. All in the pursuit of something better. Trading is just a different kind of hard. Everything worth doing is difficult - I agree and can recognize that the failure rate for retail trading is much higher than other things listed here, but 80+% of small businesses fail in the first year. Your advice is what, exactly? Spend 4 years of your life getting a degree, praying to god you get hired by some company and AI doesn't automate you out?
Bear@BearOnWindows95

I left a successful career in real estate to trade. It was the worst career decision I made by a long shot. Once i decided I was going to trade I studied finance at MIT then I dropped out when I luckily stumbled on an exploit I found in ES like 6-12 months in. I made a ton of money from that and that was how I originally got a job on a desk. When that exploit eroded I was screwed. I ended having to pick up odd jobs to keep up my lifestyle because I had little to no income. It took me around 3 years after my exploit disappeared to learn how to trade. It was the most miserable 3 years of my life. I was going broke fast. I spent every waking second studying and learning. It cost me time with my friends, family, relationships and so on. I will never get any of that time back. I was extremely lucky I finally figured it out. I started with a chunk of money, I was already in the investment world, had years of experience in finance, been pretty decent at math since I can remember and went to some solid colleges. Yeah I’m average but I did have some significant advantages when I started trading. If you want to lose your ass go for it. If you want to waste valuable time away from people you love go for it. But no matter how you twist it, it will always be a bad bet and anyone that tells you different is lying.

English
0
0
0
36
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
Inflation is no longer a supply problem, it is a demand problem. Fed will likely keep interest rates elevated until those blue bars shrink. They cannot justify aggressive rate cuts while consumer spending is still pushing prices up.
Sadi tweet media
English
0
0
0
18
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
@TheShortBear Do you think in terms of sharpe ratios as opposed to risk to reward, at the portfolio level of managing your risk?
English
0
0
0
5
Sadi
Sadi@ssmcapital·
So scared for when I hit unc status
English
0
0
0
46