St Wall

@benonwine Probably this

If Margaret Thatcher was a Rolls Royce, what would that make Angela Rayner?

@paulmasonnews The projection is off the charts

Tens of thousands march through London to reject far right division and hatred - this is working class values in action #FightFascism

@mathtech789 10, -10

X=?

@Neccccy No, it’s a slow boiling of the frog of Britain. In 40 years it will be Lebanon

Do you think that civil war is inevitable? Yes or No?

@iamyesyouareno So many weak men allowing this rhetoric to prevail

“The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth” — George Orwell

@AileenBart60380 This was an old vote. Over a year ago. Investigation is happening now as we know

ALL THE MP'S WHO HAVE VOTED AGAINST THE RAPE GANGS INQUIRY, SHOULD NEVER GET ELECTED AGAIN.

@omarsadieh @dontforgetchaos You mean the AI guy kneeling with no head ?

@dontforgetchaos This motherf*cker is sick

I make no apology for posting this photo. I think it’s a photo that will haunt America in the years to come. This is what you have become. If you defend this, have a word with yourself.

@ZackPolanski The fact that you have zero understanding of economics, and are clearly too thick to grasp it

I wonder what part of lower bills, tax billionaires they're panicking about most? Cry harder. Join.greenparty.org.uk

@Mishi_2210 51181

Brain Teaser What is the biggest number..? No Cheating

@ZackPolanski Your economic knowledge is so unbelievably bad

Who ever said we were going to fund public services solely through a wealth tax on billionaires? Why are Labour using the final day of the year to send out a clear message defending billionaires? Time to make hope (& taxing the rich) normal again. Join.greenparty.org.uk

@PythonPr None. The y should be printed lowercase.

Python Question / Quiz; What is the output of the following Python code, and why? Comment your answers below!

@MarioNawfal Surely the data can be re evaluated with only those sites which a) exist in the first place b) are not compromised by urban sprawl. Ie a few miles from towns

🇬🇧 UK MET OFFICE CAUGHT USING TEMPERATURE DATA FROM STATIONS THAT DON'T EXIST TO SUPPORT CLIMATE POLICIES Britain's Met Office is facing awkward questions after an investigator discovered over 80% of its temperature monitoring sites are classified as "junk" with measurement uncertainties of 2°C to 5°C. That's not a typo – 5 degrees Celsius of potential error. Only 19 pristine Class 1 sites remain capable of measuring actual ambient air temperature accurately. The rest? Located on airport runways, walled gardens, next to main roads, and inside solar farms. Places where concrete, engines, and infrastructure create artificial heat islands that have nothing to do with atmospheric temperature changes. The Met Office database also contains data from over 100 stations that don't exist. They're using "estimated" temperatures from unidentified neighboring stations and presenting it as real data. When journalist Ray Sanders started asking questions through Freedom of Information requests, the Met Office dismissed them as "vexatious" and "not in the public interest." After media inquiries, the Met Office quietly removed estimated data from 3 non-existent stations. Of 17 new sites opened since April 2024, nearly 65% were immediately placed in the worst quality categories. UK Science Minister Lord Patrick Vallance is calling scrutiny of this mess "misinformation" that weakens trust in science. Perhaps what actually weakens trust in science is using temperature readings from imaginary thermometers next to jet engines to justify trillion-pound Net Zero policies that reshape the entire economy. The data might be fine for tomorrow's weather forecast. Using it to revolutionize Britain's energy infrastructure? That requires stations that actually exist. Source: ZeroHedge

@UNDP Utter garbage x.com/tonyclimate/st…

Glaciers are melting. The clock is ticking. But with collective action, we can preserve these irreplaceable reservoirs of water, heritage and life. See why glaciers matter and how we can protect them: go.undp.org/3CU

@BasuroyK28867 @jitendra789789 -1 works as well (not true) -1 - 10/-1 =-1+10 =9

@jitendra789789 10. As the other value -1 doesn't satisfy the equation

x-10/x=9 x=?

@jitendra789789 x=10, -1

@jitendra789789 48

4 , 16 , 8 8 , 32 , 16 12 , ? , 24

@ZackPolanski Have you tried not being a moron ?

All in one day: Immigration Minister lied about me with a slur. Wes Streeting then tried a different attack. And the Evening Standard write yet another attack piece because I dare to say we need to tax the rich. Want to help create our better future? Join.greenparty.org.uk

@jitendra789789 88

512=71 643=94 375=87 187=?

@America_love786 27. Digits reversed after multiplying

72?

@MathsWith_Sam 125

Find the angle x?