Sabitlenmiş Tweet
stein
15.7K posts

stein
@steinRWA
Where RWA & Tokenization topics are distilled | Check my pinned post, highlights, and articles | intern @RealFinOfficial
my CV → Katılım Ağustos 2020
379 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler

Long time no article.
Got busy w/ schools stuff plus fasting along side was a FT job.
Back with basic part of asset tokenization that we all need to understand and know.
Article’s straight to the point. Enjoy 👍
stein@steinRWA
English
stein retweetledi

Tokenization isn’t a replacement for tradFi. It’s a translation layer on top of it and translation requires fluency in the source language. The teams that keep shipping products that actually work almost always have someone who deeply understands the system they’re trying to rebuild.
Think about what tokenization actually requires. You’re not just putting an asset onchain. You’re encoding legal obligations, custody arrangements, redemption mechanics, NAV calculations, compliance gates, and counterparty relationships into smart contract logic. If you don’t understand how a fund admin processes subscriptions, how a transfer agent maintains a cap table, or how a custodian settles a trade, you’re going to build something that looks right but breaks the moment institutional capital tries to flow through it.
This is the represented vs. distributed distinction playing out at the team level. A team without TradFi DNA tends to build wrappers that reference the traditional system but don’t actually integrate with it. Teams with that DNA build distributed products where the onchain layer genuinely handles the operational logic.
Look at Securitize. @carlosdomingo came from the traditional securities world and understood the role of transfer agents and broker-dealers. That’s why @Securitize didn’t just build a token platform, they became an SEC-registered transfer agent themselves. That decision, which a crypto-native team would rarely prioritize, is exactly what made them the infrastructure partner for BlackRock’s BUIDL fund. They understood that the bottleneck wasn’t technology, it was regulatory plumbing.
@OndoFinance is another clear case. The team is stacked with ex-Goldman people who understood how Treasury markets, money market funds, and institutional redemption windows actually function. That’s why USDY and OUSG aren’t just yield-bearing tokens, they’re structured with proper bankruptcy remoteness and legal segregation that institutional allocators actually require. A team without that background would likely have skipped those details and wondered why institutions wouldn’t touch the product.
@centrifuge is interesting because they came at it from the credit side. The founders understood how structured finance and SPVs work in traditional private credit. That knowledge is why they could build real securitization structures onchain rather than just wrapping loans in tokens. Their integration with MakerDAO’s RWA vaults worked precisely because they knew how to structure tranches and waterfalls that a credit analyst would recognize.
Then there’s @maplefinance, built by people who understood institutional lending desks. They knew that undercollateralized lending requires credit assessment infrastructure, not just collateral ratios. That’s a fundamentally TradFi insight applied to DeFi rails.
Even on the stablecoin side, @circle’s success with USDC owes a lot to having people who understood payments regulation, bank partnerships, and reserve management. Compare that to purely crypto-native stablecoin projects that kept reinventing (and often breaking) monetary mechanics that traditional banking solved decades ago.
The flip side and the nuance. This doesn’t mean TradFi experience alone is sufficient. Plenty of TradFi veterans have launched tokenization projects that went nowhere because they treated blockchain as a database upgrade rather than a coordination mechanism. The magic combination seems to be TradFi operational knowledge plus crypto-native distribution thinking. You need someone who knows why a fund’s NAV is struck at 4pm ET and someone who understands why composability with DeFi liquidity pools matters.
The teams that fail tend to be pure on one side. either all crypto (building elegant protocols nobody with real capital trusts) or all TradFi (building permissioned systems that replicate existing inefficiencies onchain).
English
stein retweetledi

We’re not doing tokenization the old way.
At REAL Finance, tokenization is not just issuance.
It’s the full lifecycle of the asset - with the infrastructure, validation, and trust model needed to support real financial use.
With our dual validator / consensus model, REAL is built for more than on-chain representation. It’s built for institutional-grade tokenized markets.
That’s why TradFi is interested.
Because the future of RWAs won’t be built on wrappers.
It will be built on infrastructure.
Medium: @RealFinOfficial/why-real-finance-is-taking-a-different-approach-to-tokenization-ee5464f49bc3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@RealFinOffici…

English
stein retweetledi

What people often miss is that governance is not just a feature of the network, it’s part of the network’s credibility.
In @RealFinOfficial's case, that matters a lot.
When you’re building infrastructure for real-world assets, changes to the protocol can influence a lot.
English

Been wanting to ask.
Is there a current interoperability btw private and public RWA chains rn?
I know I’ve seen canton establishing partnerships w/ other chains, but to what extent is the interoperability?
I believe that the data were separated for a reason.
stein@steinRWA
Interoperability, fixed regulations and a trustless system is what fixes neo-finance completely. work in progress.
English

Understanding how looping and lending works in DeFi simplifies how it works in RWAs.
This is a quantitative analysis of lenders versus loopers returns across @kamino, @Morpho, and @aave.
stein@steinRWA
English
stein retweetledi




