stellarobject

856 posts

stellarobject banner
stellarobject

stellarobject

@stellarobject1

The most volatile asset classes allow for the biggest edge. Solana & BASE trenches | High risk gold explorers https://t.co/RHmLTDSUbf

Katılım Ekim 2018
375 Takip Edilen120 Takipçiler
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@CryptoGorilla Also, do consider that for the Hydraze slash it took place during the days where GOLD took a ~15% swing. People like me, had work to do that weekend :-)
English
0
0
0
6
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@CryptoGorilla Upvotes/downvotes are not "one vote per person" (from memory mine are 8). You have 165k followers and publicly called out Buz, who are a well known and highly active builder on Ethos. Buz has 2k followers, but a VERY high percentage of those are on Ethos.
English
1
0
0
15
Gorilla
Gorilla@CryptoGorilla·
Just got my first ever negative review on Ethos! Looking at their profile, their top reviews are from Ethos PFPs with titles like "top Ethos user" (I didn't know that merited a positive review) But the funniest part is the review broke 100 upvotes in the first 2 hours Tell me you're using an Ethos farm channel without telling me Isn't this the exact behavior that makes review platforms useless? The same way you wouldn't trust a review bomb on yelp or fake 5 star reviews on amazon or IMDB What's the point of the platform if there's an Ethos cabal that votes together or blindly follows Serpin? ----- As for my original post below, I was misinformed on Buz changing his vote. He hadn't voted. He just spoke out against slashing, and then slashed anyways This + a few other 2,000+ scores slashing in the final minutes looks like manipulation IN MY OPINION As for Serpin attempting to sway people, this 100% happened. I won't leak dms, so if they want to speak up, it's their call ----- As for the negative review, I'm not going to retaliate because idgaf
Gorilla@CryptoGorilla

Every time @serpinxbt does one of these marketing stunts, it removes credibility from Ethos From when he copy-pasta review bombed 100+ KOLs simply for having their name on a list, which is entirely out of their control, to now slashing @Hydraze420 for being guilty by association to take away his "exemplary reputation" on the platform Feels like he'll throw anyone under the bus just to get attention to his platform As for the Hydraze slash, it failed Because it was under 40%, Serpin would have lost 320 points, stripping him of his #1 rank (on his own platform) However in the final hours, despite the loss being a lock, a few people changed their vote from defend to slash, pushing it over 40%, nulling any point-loss From what I've been told, Serpin reached out to a few people to get them to vote in his favor and protect his reputation, basically manipulating his own platform One that stands out is Buz (image below) He voted 3 days ago, writing about the slash not making sense So why did he decide the switch to slash in the last moment? IMO Serpin deserved the 320 point loss for this I know he'll say "if you feel that way, slash me" but the odds of a slash on the founder of the platform passing are near 0 I also don't care what someone's Ethos score is, so this isn't my war to fight P.S. I like the platform and think it's a good idea (and I want my airdrop), but this kind of stuff makes me not want to use it Focus on score integration and growth, not ct drama and clout chasing

English
59
1
135
22.1K
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
The Meme Wars are not over. Lots of "if" and "but"s. Point is that there are still entities duking fighting over who gets to deploy tokens.
stellarobject tweet media
English
0
0
1
21
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@scupytrooples Some would argue that Tether identified this as "something that could happen" quite early.
English
0
0
0
72
scoopy trooples
scoopy trooples@scupytrooples·
I wonder if people realize that if the American empire rules based order collapses, then the artifice propping up the international fiat currency system will come tumbling down. I’m not sure if that will mean the end of fiat. people may just shrug it off and keep on believing in the hallucination. governments may switch back to gold-backed currencies, or maybe just maybe our cryptographically secured magic internet money will take over.
English
12
4
52
4.5K
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
This is very useful. Fascinating how products like this can now be made by a single person, while they are pretty busy working on something else. 12 months ago this would have taken a team.
Serpin Taxt@serpinxbt

I get ~40 DMs a day right now across multiple platforms ...I'm sick of missing stuff. so I made this, a central DM hub called Open Mercury that is meant to look/operate like a mail inbox combining TG, X, Discord & iMessage DMs it's OSS, runs 100% locally ↓

English
1
0
4
56
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@TokenBrice There is something very "future" about being able to iterate on tooling this fast
English
0
0
1
8
Serpin Taxt
Serpin Taxt@serpinxbt·
the best lore you never know about Ethos, as it relates to Poker players in Crypt Ethos CTO @benwalther256 worked for Pokerstars, helping identify collusion & cheating (multi-accounting, skype calls, scams...) During the late 2000s...... 😏
English
17
0
85
2.6K
Alpha co
Alpha co@alpha_co·
Key word: profitable and I can only think of like 5 profitable crypto businesses this cycle… Binance Polymarket World Liberty fi Hyperliquid What other profitable businesses am I missing?
Alpha co tweet media
English
98
4
131
19K
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
Maybe the alpha is to just short all the realistic candidates? 😅
stellarobject tweet media
English
0
0
1
39
Zora
Zora@zora·
The world’s attention market is now live on Solana.
English
417
109
862
1.1M
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@adamamcbride Not saying that the dude doesn't have a point. Flipping his argument around. I think his arguments says something about the way he sees business and investing: Edge comes from insider access (and possibly crime).
English
0
0
0
0
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@adamamcbride If I were running Berkshire's treasury, the #1 priority would be to have a gigantic pile of highly liquid assets to acquire assets when the markets crash every decade or so.
English
1
0
0
2
Adam McBride
Adam McBride@adamamcbride·
This is kinda wild and puts Buffett in a new light.
Triple Net Investor@TripleNetInvest

JUST IN: Chamath Palihapitiya makes a big claim that Warren Buffett’s insane pre 2000 returns may have benefited from access to information asymmetry not available to the public Here's what he had to say: "In 2000, we introduced the law called Reg FD. And what was the point of Reg FD? It was basically that if you're a CFO, you cannot talk to an individual stock manager and tell him something that you then don't tell everybody else. Essentially inside information. That used to be not illegal. I won't say that it was legal. I would just say that used to be not illegal. You call your CFO buddy, he says, "hey, how you doing?" He goes, man, "Quarter was a blockbuster." You would go and buy the stock. And starting in the 2000s, it became illegal. And there used to be these networks of information arbitrage that took advantage of this. Now, this is an example of Warren Buffett's returns, pre and post Reg FD. Now, what do you see? His returns were double the market returns when this kind of information sharing was legal. And the minute that it became illegal and you had to basically act on the same edge as everybody else, his returns went to the market return. He generated zero alpha. In fact, he probably on the margins lost a little bit. So this is the single best investor in the world. This is what happens when you have information symmetry. So it's just meant to explain that markets when there's asymmetry. Billions and billions of dollars will be made in asymmetry. The prediction markets today, unless they are regulated out of existence or shut down, will look like the stock market pre-Reg FD."

English
7
0
10
1.6K
xCombinator
xCombinator@xcombhq·
We're shutting down $X. following the footsteps of $SEND. launched $X in December 2024 as a fun experiment. gave 14 Sol allocations to Doge Capital holders, including myself (never sold). the goal was simple - investment DAO people had higher expectations and the price reflected it. can't blame them, we had a solid track record. so we tried to build a real business that could back $X. but things don't always go your way. what matters is you keep trying. so we did. built trading agents, launchpads, telegram bots. generated $200k+, bought back tokens, add to the LP. but we realised something the constant pressure to live up to the expectations of the holders made us chase trends instead of building long term. we were running experiments too fast just to keep up. even when we made $0 and spent our own money building, people called us a rug & the team was labelled as scammers. while all we did was genuinely try to add value back. the hype died. most left. but a few stayed. the real ones who wanted to see us win long term. people who gave real feedback, not just "dev do something." this is for them. xCombinator continues on Solana, just without a token. if you still hold $X, burn it by February 14 and get a loyalty NFT. burn: xcombinator.app the NFT represents long term alignment and the amount of token you have burnt. we hope to reward you in the future from our successful experiments and products. we remember who stayed. we ain't giving up. just getting started right. day 1.
xCombinator tweet media
English
15
8
31
4.1K
stellarobject
stellarobject@stellarobject1·
@0xSammy Someone has to own enough "yes" to make it worth their while to get up from their chair and manipulate the market by filing a lawsuit. If the odds get high enough it may also be a viable strategy to simply sell into people thinking that "someone" will do this
English
1
0
0
100