Stephen Joncus

4.8K posts

Stephen Joncus banner
Stephen Joncus

Stephen Joncus

@stevejoncus

An attorney battling tyranny in America - https://t.co/WtQIIUsVxT.

Boring, Oregon Katılım Mart 2009
494 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Congressman Brandon Gill
Congressman Brandon Gill@RepBrandonGill·
Today I asked an abortion advocate what her favorite method of abortion is.
English
7.9K
25.3K
128.5K
8.6M
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
BREAKING: The Islamic Republic is preparing to hang eight women. Not a word from the international community or so-called human rights organizations.
Eyal Yakoby tweet media
English
4.6K
35.3K
66.3K
3.2M
Stephen Joncus
Stephen Joncus@stevejoncus·
To be clear, my email to Connie was not meant as a criticism of her or anyone in the ORP. It was merely to update her on the victory that grassroots Republicans achieved in Coos County. I fully support Connie. I think that she is doing a fantastic job as ORP Chair!
English
0
1
5
145
Ben Edtl
Ben Edtl@benedtl·
We have the power to change EVERYTHING in Oregon. Political parties are controlled by the party members, not the corrupt party heads. This is a letter from Stephen Joncus to corrupt ORP Chair Connie Welchel, who stands silently by as county party chairs rig the rules to benefit their corrupt handlers in the legislature. She is complicit in facilitating corruption throughout the party. Now, young Nardbrain of Coos County will have to personally pay $38k in legal fees while David Brock Smith, the crook who put him up to it, will walk away free of penalty. Senator David Brock Smith used this stupid kid to break the law for his own benefit. Corruption doesn't pay. If you shill for this corrupt establishment, you will pay the price. County Chairs: don't be a Nardbrain. Serve your members, not your corrupt officials.
Ben Edtl tweet mediaBen Edtl tweet mediaBen Edtl tweet media
English
12
50
124
3.3K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Mary McDonald-Lewis
Mary McDonald-Lewis@mmcdonaldlewis·
A multi-part series on the imminent fall of Portland, due to crumbling real estate, Byzantine laws, usurious penalties and a government hiding the darkest secret Portland holds. Series continues in the comments. Posted on the Corrupted Governor Tina Kotek FB page by Mark Rogers. 1/ "THIS IS THE MAP THAT WILL DESTROY PORTLAND. -By SEP Asset Stabilization LLC EDIT: BELOW IS THE LIVE LINK google.com/maps/d/edit... This is our first part expose concerning the antitrust of Portland City and Multnomah county. This represents 8 billion of POTENTIAL AND IMMINENT LOSS to the city and county. Every blue dot is a brick building that can't be insured(without paying 3 to 10 time premium). Can't be financed or refinanced. Can't be sold at fair market value(10 cents on the dollar seems to be the going rate). And in many cases — can't even be auctioned. There are 1,369 of them. They are scattered across every neighborhood you care about — Parkrose, Old Town, Sandy Boulevard, Division, Alberta, Mississippi, St. Johns, Central Eastside, Montavilla, Lents. The restaurants you eat at. The apartments your neighbors live in. The small businesses that anchor your block. All unreinforced masonry. All under a mandatory seismic retrofit order from the City of Portland. Almost none of them have a funded path to compliance. Retrofit costs run $800,000 to $8,000,000 per building. The buildings are often worth less than the cost of fixing them. No conventional lender will finance a loan where construction cost exceeds collateral value. So the owners are trapped. They can't fix the building. They can't sell the building. They can't insure the building. And when they fall behind on property taxes — because of course they do — Multnomah County forecloses. And here's where it gets ugly. THE COUNTY ISN'T AUCTIONING THESE BUILDINGS. Oregon law requires it. ORS Chapter 275 lays out the foreclosure auction process. The county is supposed to auction tax-foreclosed properties and recover what it can. But what happens when you auction a building that nobody can insure, nobody can finance, and nobody knows how to retrofit? Nobody bids. And if nobody bids, the county is stuck holding a building it can't maintain, can't sell, and can't put back on the tax rolls. The assessed value collapses. The tax revenue disappears. The building rots. The county spent more administering the foreclosure than it will ever recover. So they stopped auctioning them. The county's own budget documents show foreclosure auction revenue collapsing year over year. Their Tax Title program page confirms the last public sale was May 2024. The next one? "Anticipated Spring 2026." We're in Spring 2026 right now. No properties have been posted. No auction has been announced. And the last time they did sell, it was bare land — strips and small parcels sold to adjacent property owners. Not buildings. Not the 1,369 buildings on this map. They are hiding the problem. Instead of auctioning buildings that nobody will buy, the county quietly absorbs the loss. Your tax dollars subsidize the gap between what these buildings owe and what the county can't recover. The county just settled a $3.5 million class action lawsuit for keeping surplus proceeds from the foreclosure sales it DID conduct — money that legally belonged to the original property owners. They were foreclosing on people, selling their buildings, and pocketing the difference."
Mary McDonald-Lewis tweet media
English
114
471
1.3K
54.9K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Steven Jerry Chapin
Steven Jerry Chapin@Wrygryn·
Oregon Primary Information (Republican) From Someone Who Is Not An Expert: Here are my thoughts on each of the candidates thus far. Please feel free to try and change my mind if you disagree with my assessment, I'm not 100% sold on any of the candidates (but I'm leaning towards Medina). David Medina 1) Very bold and not afraid to speak unpopular truth 2) No real political background previously, so he's not a part of the current Republican establishment 3) Focus is primarily on stopping fraud and putting Oregonians first. 4) Some name recognition from social media work 5) Low funds unless his recent fundraiser did something miraculous 6) Very young for a governor, no political experience 7) ONLY candidate to openly support ending VBM 8) Grass roots activist, social media commentator, conservative influencer 9) Was at J6, but was not prosecuted (peaceful activist only) 10)Oregon right to life endorses him Dudley 1) Solid Name Recognition (Former NBA player, and ran for Governor in 2010) 2) Proven chance that he can win (only lost in 2010 by 1-2%, closest Gubernatorial race in Oregon history) 3) Seems like a solid person (created charities, philanthropist, running on conservative policies). 4) No real political background previously, so he's not a part of the current Republican establishment 5) Well funded (second only to Drazan) 6) Some business experience, wealth management 7) Hasn't supported ending VBM, nor has he taken on any really controversial topics. 8) Only candidate that isn't endorsed by Oregon Right to Life. He supports abortions in certain situations, and personally is against abortion, but he has said he will not seek to make abortion illegal. Ed Diehl 1) Currently House district 17 Representative and has served in that capacity since 2023 (originally ran unopposed)--so some experience in politics. 2) Previous business background with bachelors and masters in Mechanical Engineering. 3) Face of NOTAXOR, a petition to alter a Democrat law to raise taxes and fees, and put it up for citizens to vote on. Seems great on the surface but it's mostly just for show. Does give him GREAT name recognition with everyone who helped get petition signatures or who signed it. 4) Establishment GOP (House Rep) with a weak voting record. 5) Claims to be "grass roots" but he is a full time politician, supported by ORP, supported by most elected officials (if not all), and has been supported by all (or almost all) Republican PAC's in one way or another. (That's about as "establishment" as you can get, there is nothing grass roots about him). 6) Doesn't want to get rid of most illegal aliens, just the few that have been violent--but he presents it misleadingly to make people think he will deport all or "most" illegal aliens. 7) Lied during debate about where funds from SB 2010 go and what they are used for. (This is one of the bills he voted against Republicans on, helping Democrats fund free health care for illegals, and other garbage like trans surgeries for kids). 8) Voted for paddle board tax. Claims he was "fooled" by Democrats, and now is supporting the IP to repeal it. (I'm not sure I believe that) 9) He doesn't support ending VBM, doesn't support deporting all/most illegals, and he uses words very deceptively. 10) Oregon right to life endorses him. Christina Drazan 1) Has most campaign money and name recognition 2) Is a fulltime career politician having worked in the house and senate for years, and has done lots of committee's and leadership roles. She has the most political experience, by far, of all the currently running candidates 3) Ran for Governor in 2022, only lost by 3% to 4%--so very close and proven that she has a chance to win 4) Voting record is RINO in my opinion, though I haven't found her lying on anything like I did with Diehl. Some would say her voting record is worse than Ed Diehl, some would say it's better--all depending on how much weight you put on specific votes. I haven't caught her lying on anything yet like I did with Diehl, but she hasn't debated as much. 5) She doesn't support ending VBM, and has said in public she is not an "Election denier". The quote is a bit dated, but I can't find her changing that statement anywhere so I assume she still claims no election fraud exists like all the other mainstream establishment politicians do in Oregon. 6) Oregon right to life endorses her. Danielle Bethell 1) Strong Conservative values, very involved locally 2) She is not part of the current establishment GOP and has little to no campaign money 3) Little name recognition 4) Doesn't support ending VBM and hasn't said she believes election fraud exists, but she has spoken on election integrity and said it's a "top priority." 5) Previous work in local politics only (Salem/Keizer area as commissioner and on schoolboard) 6) Small business owner 7) Does not support ending vote by mail publicly, Unknown if she thinks voting fraud exists 8) Oregon Right to Life endorses her If I could pick our governor I would pick Medina, because we need someone aware of the fraud, to be able to fix the fraud. We need someone without ties to the establishment Oregon Republican party (because they are part of the fraud). And we need someone who is a fighter. Of all the candidates, I believe Dudley would have the highest chance of winning against Democrats in a Gubernatorial race due to his name recognition, moderate stance, and his lack of endorsement from Oregon Right to Life (which would get him a lot of votes from independents and disillusioned Democrats.) I just don't think he will win the Primary. Ed Diehl or Drazan would have about the same chance to win against Tina Kotek, but definitely less chance than Dudley. Medina and Bethell would struggle to win against democrats even if they win the primary because they are solid conservatives. (probably my two favorites, so it pains me to say that, but I believe it to be accurate). I'm not saying they CAN'T win, just that it would be harder for them than the other three by a fair amount. I don't personally want Ed to win, but his campaign has been brilliant and he has played his hand well (bit scummy for my tastes, but extremely effective). If I had to guess today, I'd say Ed was going to win the primary based on all current available data I have seen. If you have any info I've missed, please reply below if you think it might change my mind or be important.
English
20
10
28
1.4K
Alex Jones
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones·
"You Shit All Over Me & Rub It In... If You Think I've Been On Your Ass Now, Say One More Thing & I'll Show You How The Cow Ate The Cabbage!" Alex Jones Debates Going TOTAL Scorched Earth On President Trump Despite This Historic Opportunity We Have To Save The Country & The World "I'm Not Looking For A Fight, But If You Want One, You Came To The Right Place!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
5.3K
3.1K
22.9K
1.3M
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
@XTexasGirlX
@XTexasGirlX@XtexasgirlX·
🚀NASA just dropped never-before-seen far side of the Moon footage... and WAIT FOR IT! 😂😂😂
English
557
2K
12.4K
515.6K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Steve Hammerson for Douglas County Commissioner
🇺🇸 Patriots! 🇺🇸 Getting un-informed voters to view your campaign as legitimate means getting a mailer to their door! $25 = 50 mailers $6,000 = 12,000 mailers = win this election! 🇺🇸🤩🇺🇸 Please donate 2 weneedsteve.com if able! Update - $800 of $6,000 raised so far 🇺🇸
English
17
41
63
6.4K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Jack 🇺🇸 Hammer 🇺🇸 Son
Jack 🇺🇸 Hammer 🇺🇸 Son@SHammerson1776·
🇺🇸 Grassroots in reality! Thank you RUCPAC and all of our volunteers! 🇺🇸
English
5
23
42
3.3K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
David Vance
David Vance@DavidVance·
This is what economic suicide looks like;
English
1.2K
12.5K
65.5K
4.5M
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Alex Jones
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones·
GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: The Democratic Party Plan To Steal The 2026 Midterms Has LEAKED! Lawyer & Trump Confidant Peter Ticktin Drops The Mother Of All Election Fraud Bombshells & Fires The Bat Signal! MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW! »WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
152
1.4K
2.8K
712.6K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Attorney General Ken Paxton
Attorney General Ken Paxton@KenPaxtonTX·
If the establishment fought as hard for the SAVE America Act as they do for a weak incumbent who spent $100 million only to be rejected by nearly 60% of GOP voters, it would already be law. It's sad incumbent protection is more important than advancing President Trump's agenda.
English
1.3K
9.6K
36.6K
354.7K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Ian Prior
Ian Prior@iandprior·
🚨🚨🚨Opt-your children out of trans insanity in public schools. And if they refuse you, sue the school board members, in their official and individual capacity.
America First Legal@America1stLegal

/1🚨Fight trans insanity in schools — AFL has released an updated parental opt-out template letter following SCOTUS’s decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta, reaffirming parents’ constitutional right to direct their children’s upbringing and education.

English
16
294
732
24.5K
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
DC_Draino
DC_Draino@DC_Draino·
John Cornyn’s Liberty Score is an F. He gets booed at Texas rallies. He’s been censured by the GOP for infringing on our 2nd Amendment rights. Time to send this old RINO pig out to pasture.
Kambree@KamVTV

Oh yeah, brilliant strategy. Let’s all pretend John Cornyn is the “most conservative” option… while sitting there with a 54% Liberty Score and an F rating. An F. Not even a gentleman’s flipping C. An F. That’s not a conservative record, that’s the political equivalent of barely showing up and hoping nobody checks the grades. Bring it. We’re going to fight like hell to send @KenPaxtonTX to Senate and it looks like the rest of the country will help us.

English
488
5.8K
15.1K
175.3K
Stephen Joncus
Stephen Joncus@stevejoncus·
No doubt about it, childhood vaccines cause autism. x.com/ChildrensHD/st…
Children’s Health Defense@ChildrensHD

Aaron Siri sued the CDC with one simple demand: Show us the studies that allegedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Their answer will shock you: “40 to 70% of parents who have a child with autism report that they believe vaccines cause their child’s autism.” “When you ask them what vaccines you think cause your child’s autism, they’ll say the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “On behalf of ICANN … we sent a Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA request to the CDC.” “We said, your website says vaccines do not cause autism. Please give us the studies that show that Hep B vaccines given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Please give us the studies that show that DTaP vaccine given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Same thing for IPV vaccine, for PCV vaccine, and for HIV vaccine.” “Each one of those vaccines is given three times each in the first six months of life. 15 injections.” “They never gave us the studies.” “I sued them in the Southern District of New York.” “Days before the hearing, I get a list of 20 studies, finally, from the DOJ, because they represent the CDC.” “19 of them have nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “They were all either MMR studies or studies of an ingredient that wasn’t in those vaccines.” “One of them was an Institute of Medicine [study] from 2012 that canvassed all the literature on whether DTaP vaccine does or does not cause autism.” “The Institute of Medicine … said, we can only find one study on DTaP and autism.” “And in fact it showed an association between [the] DTaP vaccine and autism.” “But the IOM threw it out because they said there’s no unvaccinated control in it.” “When their back was to the wall, they had nothing.” “There are no studies.” “They could not produce one that showed the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Here’s the thing they left out: there is one study out there regarding Hep B vaccines and autism.” “It’s from Gallagher and Goodman out of the University of Stony Brook.” “And it showed that kids that got Hep B vaccine versus those that did in the first month of life had three times the rate of autism.” @joerogan @AaronSiriSG

English
0
0
1
29
Stephen Joncus retweetledi
Children’s Health Defense
Children’s Health Defense@ChildrensHD·
Aaron Siri sued the CDC with one simple demand: Show us the studies that allegedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Their answer will shock you: “40 to 70% of parents who have a child with autism report that they believe vaccines cause their child’s autism.” “When you ask them what vaccines you think cause your child’s autism, they’ll say the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “On behalf of ICANN … we sent a Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA request to the CDC.” “We said, your website says vaccines do not cause autism. Please give us the studies that show that Hep B vaccines given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Please give us the studies that show that DTaP vaccine given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Same thing for IPV vaccine, for PCV vaccine, and for HIV vaccine.” “Each one of those vaccines is given three times each in the first six months of life. 15 injections.” “They never gave us the studies.” “I sued them in the Southern District of New York.” “Days before the hearing, I get a list of 20 studies, finally, from the DOJ, because they represent the CDC.” “19 of them have nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “They were all either MMR studies or studies of an ingredient that wasn’t in those vaccines.” “One of them was an Institute of Medicine [study] from 2012 that canvassed all the literature on whether DTaP vaccine does or does not cause autism.” “The Institute of Medicine … said, we can only find one study on DTaP and autism.” “And in fact it showed an association between [the] DTaP vaccine and autism.” “But the IOM threw it out because they said there’s no unvaccinated control in it.” “When their back was to the wall, they had nothing.” “There are no studies.” “They could not produce one that showed the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Here’s the thing they left out: there is one study out there regarding Hep B vaccines and autism.” “It’s from Gallagher and Goodman out of the University of Stony Brook.” “And it showed that kids that got Hep B vaccine versus those that did in the first month of life had three times the rate of autism.” @joerogan @AaronSiriSG
English
76
1.2K
3.3K
73.7K