Grumpy Rabbit (Alan Lovejoy)

𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐙: “𝐁𝐈𝐑𝐓𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐙𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐏 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄𝐒 𝐍𝐎 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐄 𝐀𝐓 𝐀𝐋𝐋” — 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐇𝐄 𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐅𝐈𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐍𝐎𝐁𝐎𝐃𝐘 𝐈𝐒 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 Alan Dershowitz just pointed out something that both sides of the birthright citizenship case are deliberately ignoring — and it may be the most important constitutional argument on the table. 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟓 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟒𝐭𝐡 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 gives 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 the power to decide who is “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. That’s not the Court’s job. It’s explicitly delegated to the legislature. And nobody is arguing it. Why? Because, as Dershowitz explains, “𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦’𝘴 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘊𝘓𝘜 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱. 𝘚𝘰 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵.” He laid out the absurdity with a hypothetical: “𝘐𝘧 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘨𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘊𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯 — 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘊𝘓𝘜, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴.” Then the core principle: “𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦. 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵.” On the outcome, Dershowitz was cautious but telling: “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵.” He thinks the most likely result is a 𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 — the Court upholds the broad reading but hints in dicta that Congress has the power to narrow it. Not a clean win, but a roadmap. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞 𝟓. 𝐍𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐭. 𝐃𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐳 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠.

USAID money was funneled to an organization that created fake Ukraine and Russiagate evidence against Donald Trump The CIA then worked with the agency to use that evidence in the impeachments against Donald Trump to remove him as President Literally treason “New reporting reveals that USAID and a CIA analyst were behind a project that later led to one of Trump's impeachments independent journalist — USAID effectively created this organization called the Organized Crime and Corruption Research Project Reporting Project — We also know that it did the foundational research that was essential to bringing the impeachment case against Trump in December of 2019. It was what the CIA whistleblower relied upon in his initial complaint in lDecember of 2019 So those are the facts — So this is basically a situation where the CIA person in the White House who've been left over by Obama writes a a complaint describing alleged violation of the law. This was then picked up in the house, impeached Trump, the Senate of course declined to hear it. But I think what's so interesting here is that this is an organization that's behind it that's funded by USAID that would not exist without USAID in what I think you have to consider to be domestic politics, which is absolutely forbidden. — So this looks like regime change tactics that the CIA and USAID had done abroad being brought back home against Donald Trump”