Ryan Trevis

7 posts

Ryan Trevis banner
Ryan Trevis

Ryan Trevis

@streetugc

Learn to work as a UGC street interviewer & land $1k–$5k brand deals

Katılım Kasım 2025
19 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
Let me tell you something you might not already know about me. I actually started making money on the streets by beatboxing for pennies. Literally pennies, someday I might get 20 pounds a whole day, and I'm out there in the freezing cold in Birmingham beatboxing into a microphone hoping someone stops and then hoping out of all those people that do stop someone gives me a couple quid. That was my life only a couple of years ago, but now, I fly all around the world, Here I'm in Bali, Next place I'm going to Thailand, I've been in Miami, New York, Barcelona, all these different places just this year. I actually got here for one thing that no one else is teaching at the moment. Everybody knows about UGC ads, but no one ever combined it with UGC street interview ads. What I do now is simple, I reach out to brands and help them create UGC street interview ads that look and feel real. If a brand is selling creatine, for example, I'll be out there with a paid actor who's jacked. I'll ask, "How's your experience with creatine?" He'll say something like, "Honestly, I've tried a lot of brands. Most didn't work the way they promised. But then I found this brand, and it's genuinely been the best so far." Then I ask, "Would you recommend it?" He goes, "Definitely, yes." Why does this work so well? Because it destroys the CPA for the company. Before, they were paying $10 to acquire one customer, now they are paying $2. People can spot a studio ad from a mile away and understands that it's paid ads, but a street interview, it feels real. It feels raw, and people trust it, so they buy.
English
0
0
2
13
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
@iamgdsa People buy from people, human authenticity works and it'll keep working forever
English
0
0
1
25
Guillaume
Guillaume@iamgdsa·
they'll keep telling you that face react + app demo doesn't work anymore.. that's some of our video just from last week. it still works... and converts. it's not the only format we use, and yes there are more "advanced" formats, and there are formats that "convert" more, and others that convert less, nevertheless, this still works, DATA DOESN'T LIE. do not listen to anyone here. Just listen to the DATA.
Guillaume tweet media
Guillaume@iamgdsa

"face react & hook + app demo doesn't work anymore" i literally find million-view videos every time i do my morning scroll research only trust raw data

English
17
4
115
16.4K
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
@TheLewisW That's what I realized while doing beat-boxing in the streets and that's the exact reason why my UGC street interview ads converts the best
English
0
0
1
11
Lewis
Lewis@TheLewisW·
People don’t buy the fancy marketing. People buy from people. Soon as you realise this, you’ll make much more money.
English
38
1
41
1.1K
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
@jameskellyads @benradack Authenticity is our optimization level in UGC street interview ads. One unexpected laugh or a raw answer from the random stranger spike CTR by 2-3x.
English
0
0
2
39
James Kelly
James Kelly@jameskellyads·
if looking at those 3 metrics (CPC, CTR, ATC rate) rather than ROAS/CPA would Cost Per ATC not be a more encompassing metric to look for to push spend up? while still using the 3 lower/softer metrics to diagnose if CPATC is too low? If I have an ad I think has good potential or want to leave on longer, I'll look at the funnel to see how the soft metrics are performing, so just curious on thoughts
English
2
0
4
4.4K
Ben Radack 🏝️
Ben Radack 🏝️@benradack·
ROAS & CPA are not the best metrics for analyzing your ads... You need to look at CPC, Link CTR, Add to Cart rate, and ROAS/CPA together. Here's why... Understanding value for your spend: Let's say your ad has a 60% add to cart rate. Sounds great, right? But if your CPC is $5 and your Link CTR is 1%, that high add to cart rate doesn't matter. You're paying too much per click and getting them too slowly. What a winning ad actually looks like: → High Link CTR (you're getting clicks frequently) → Low CPC (you're not paying a lot for those clicks) → High add to cart rate (30%+, people are interested) → Good ROAS or CPA (they're converting) When all of these work together, you have a real winner. Why this matters: You might have an ad with great ROAS that's actually just retargeting people who were going to buy anyway. This framework is for your top-spending top-of-funnel ads - the ones bringing new people into your funnel. If an ad has good economics at the top (CTR, CPC) and middle (add to cart rate), the bottom (ROAS/CPA) will usually follow. If it's expensive to get clicks and you're getting them slowly, even a high conversion rate won't save you. You need the whole funnel working efficiently.
English
7
3
36
2.8K
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
@upen946 6/10 product with 8/10 marketing will always sell more than 10/10 product with 4/10 marketing
English
1
0
1
132
Upen
Upen@upen946·
You think your product failed. In reality, you just never marketed it properly.
English
202
20
300
11.9K
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
"We educate, entertain, AND convert later." Yeah that's the same format we follow in Street Interview Ads. grab attention with a hot chick or someone sprinting up to a stranger, hit them with sharp questions, throw a joke or two… and it auto converts. People trust what feels unscripted.
English
1
0
1
56
Lorenzo | Meta Ads & Performance Creatives 📈
Creative diversity will be EVERYTHING in 2026. But 80% of brands are ignoring it. Here are the 5 pillars we are working with for our clients in order to scale. (And how diversity is found with them): 1. Persona Targeted This one is big. Winning brands are very detailed with their scripts, so if you find 3-7 micro-personas per product and match creatives & angles to each one, you’ll win. Yes, your product is a meal kit, but you target: - Busy moms - Gym bros coming off meal prep - Professionals looking for something quick If you only feed Meta one persona… it only has one type of person to win over. 2. Angle Your product has 20+ reasons someone might buy it. You’re probably using 2. We hit every angle that’s proven to convert: emotional, functional, aspirational, authority-based, comparison, contrarian, and problem or desire-first. With ten angles executed correctly, you can already figure out the main reasons your audience will buy your product. 3. Awareness Level Here’s the biggest mistake I see: Brands write ads for people who are already thinking about their solution. Then complain when nothing converst. Create diversity by covering every awareness layer and moving them forward. Start your ads with educational blocks for once, instead of going straight into the product or solution you provide. One ad can’t convert all traffic (cold & warmer) 4. Format Used This is where most of your diversity actually comes from. We rotate formats aggressively: - Spokesperson talking to a crowd - Skit conversations with a ton of humor - Podcast clip on our own studio (they’re not AI) Plus, a dozen more we are testing for 2026. Same angle + same persona + new format = a completely different ad in Meta’s eyes. (Post-Andromeda & with GEM) 5. Actors/Creators One actor can crush it for persona A but not work for persona B. Same thing can be said about angles & awareness levels. We cast talent that fits the tone, age, energy, and “world-fitting” of the persona we’re targeting. Or they’re just way too good at acting and creating ads that don’t look like ads. That’s the ultimate way to do things. Create a ton of diversity… But what does diversity matter if you can’t keep attention for more than 30 seconds? That’s what our stealth creative ads do. We educate, entertain, AND convert later. They give meta the perfect sequence of ads needed to scale now and in 2026. We’re currently full right now. Want to work with us Q1 2026? Go to our website in my profile or click the link below.
Lorenzo | Meta Ads & Performance Creatives 📈 tweet media
English
7
4
60
3.6K
Ryan Trevis
Ryan Trevis@streetugc·
yeah this is true that solo UGC creators & models are vanished but one thing which UGC creators do that cannot be replaced yet, and it's UGC street interviews. When a model pops up on your feed, people instantly assume “she’s getting paid.” But a street interview feels raw, unpolished, human. It looks like real life, not an ad. That’s why our interviews convert like crazy. We ask a series of natural questions, the actor gives believable reactions, and the viewer gets pulled into the illusion that this is a real interaction. No studio energy or forced smiles. Just “two people talking on the street.” It feels real and CPA drops 3-5x every single time, people believe what they are watching and that makes ads print.
Amin@eCom_Amin

that girl ain't real it's nano banana pro that shit just changed ecom and no one’s prepared for that ugc. media buying. 90% just fucking died here’s what that means for us: the old way: hire model: $500 photographer: $1.5k editor: $300 timeline: 2 weeks output: 50 images total: $2,300 for one shoot fucking pathetic the new way: open nano banana write a banger prompt generate 500 variations timeline: 20 minutes total: $10 you think i'm exaggerating? i've been using it for 2 months generated 2,000+ product images spent $40 total and nobody could tell customers don't care if model is real they care if product looks good and if it fucking prints ai makes products look amazing testing fast makes a ton of money win win the shift is actually insane: everyone focused on "ai will take coding jobs" or that "ai will replace copywriters" idiots nobody saw this coming; ai replacing thots the models the lifestyle shots the ugc creators all dead dead dead that WHOLE market is about to collapse because why pay $300 for ugc creator when ai generates better content for $0.08 in 30 seconds the math isn't mathing here's what actually changes: testing speed goes from weeks to hours before: - brief creator monday - receive content next friday - test the following week - one iteration per month now: - generate 100 variations monday morning - test monday afternoon - results tuesday - iterate wednesday - 10 iterations per month 10x faster learning 10x faster scaling cost structure collapses before: creative budget: $3k/mo (10 creators × $300) now: creative budget: $50/mo (unlimited generations) extra $2,950 goes to ad spend which means faster scaling not to mention that quality becomes CONSISTENT before: creator A: great content creator B: mid content creator C: unusable inconsistent quality from ugc which means inconsistent results now: every generation has the same quality same lighting same vibe same standard consistent quality with nano banana that shit means CONSISTENT results the people who get replaced: "i have a nice face" "i can hold products" "i look relatable" (you're cooked blud) (just pack it up g) ai can: - generate any face - any expression - any scenario - any demographic instantly (so you're not that good pal) (better pack it up once again) the people who survive: "i have 100k real followers" "my audience trusts me" "i am the brand" you're fine because ai can't replicate: - real relationships - authentic influence - actual credibility (YET) same with media buyers: "waiting for creative" "doing it on photoshop" "need more budget to test" those excuses die today because now you have: unlimited creative instant delivery basically free so if you can't scale with that you were never good you were just lucky which means the shit ones get fired because the good ones can deliver more easily and 10x faster with more quality but here's the timeline to this whole AI bullshit: next 3 months: early adopters dominate next 6 months: everyone catches up next 12 months: mandatory to compete if you're not using ai for content creation in 6 months you're leaving money on table if you're not using it in 12 months you're just losing the advantage: first movers get 6 month head start while competitors wait for creators you're testing 100 variations while they spend $3k on creative you're spending $3k on data while they iterate monthly you're iterating daily the gap compounds fast and here’s my confession: i’ve been using this since september results: - creative costs down 94% - testing speed up 800% - winning creative found 12x faster - roas up 2.1x and zero people knew until i'm posting about it now because the images look real the models look real the scenarios look real only difference: they're fucking not but consumers don't care about real they care about convincing and ai? that shit is very convincing the future: 12 months from now: everything will go extinct: - basic ugc creators - expensive photoshoots - slow creative iteration - high production costs standard: - ai-generated models - instant content creation - rapid testing cycles - near-zero production costs the brands that adapt fast eat the brands that adapt slow but here's the opportunity that's left: if you're running ecom brand right now: option 1: keep paying creators $300 wait 2 weeks per content piece test slowly lose market share option 2: learn nano banana generate unlimited variations test rapidly dominate market same choice as: - horse vs car - mail vs email - blockbuster vs netflix technology doesn't ask permission it just wins so here’s the lesson: every technological shift has same pattern: phase 1: "this is cool but limited" phase 2: "this is getting good" phase 3: "this is better than humans" phase 4: "humans are obsolete" we're at phase 3 with ai content phase 4 is 6-12 months away position accordingly because once everyone has access to this the advantage disappears first movers win fast followers survive slow adopters die choose your position

English
0
0
1
39