STX Watch

STX Watch BETA will be delayed until January, 2026, in the meantime check out @nolloapp

If you haven't tried Nollo yet, check it out now at alpha.nollo.app - 100% secure (no wallet connect) - Major chains (BTC, STX, ETH, SOL, more soon) - The best overview of your crypto networth And the best part, its free.

alpha 0.0.1 released - feel free to play around and report bugs / issues

@TheOneNFT 👀👀

domain(s) secured - super excited to launch the multi-chain wallet tracker I have been working on this month. Figuring out your networth in between hot wallets, cold wallets, LP positions, CEX's, DEX's and even NFT collections will soon take only 1 click - and most importantly: no wallet connection needed.

Stacks (Sip 10) Ordinals (including Runes) All EVM (ETH, BNB, BASE, AVALANCHE etc.) Solana What else should we add?

@nftnutt @Stacks If there isn't within a few months we will build it.

@stxwatch @Stacks Is there an app that advises how to deploy your STX, stSTX, stSTXbtc, Leo etc. for maximum yield?

Working on a standalone app to check your portfolio with your morning coffee. You will be able to add all your @Stacks wallets - sip 10 tokens, LP positions, sBTC - everything is fetched automatically in US Dollar or BTC amounts. No need to connect any wallet, making it 100% secure. In addition to that you will get important data, such as profit/loss and other indicators directly from STX Watch. Once STX is integrated we will also add other chains starting with EVM, Exchange API's and more - so you will have a perfect overview of your total portfolio value - risk free. Beta launches end of this month, stay tuned.

Starting with Stacks and ETH - what other chain would you like to see shipping with the beta?

@tripnm0nkey @Stacks Yes, will roll out with a December update.

@stxwatch @Stacks NFT Floor prices also?

@muneeb are you teasing privacy functionality for Stacks?

on a long-enough timeline, old ideas become new again in bitcoin & crypto. privacy is new again. it makes sense to focus on fundamental ideas; the markets wake up at the right times, and the score takes care of itself.

We've received a lot of positive DMs after announcing our refusal to take grant funds, some asking to support us directly. We will be initiating a small angel investor funding round mid December (after the beta launch), laying out future plans. If you'd like to learn more please send an email to George directly via g@xs.do STX Watch is part of a broader network of protocols/projects led by Xquisite Group (SG), including the upcoming Drone Wars game, the MEME App and 3 more multi-chain projects launching in 2026 in the pipeline.

@Citizen_Stx @TheOneNFT @Stacks 😅

@TheOneNFT @Stacks @stxwatch Please change the colors from red to green. Thank you in advance!

I believe this service will be super useful for anyone minting on @Stacks in future. Submit your collected wallets and @stxwatch gives you a good overview of the wallet 'health' of your potential minters. I will expand on that further, perhaps make it a premium option payable with $MEME with more data insights.

@TheOneNFT 2/ alone would be very interesting for a lot of projects, even those launched recently.

A chain can only attract more quality developers, if its current developers are treated with respect. I really believe the current grants structure is missing a key element - a fast-track for builders which: a) have a functional product that is beneficial for stacks for > 1 year b) have been with stacks for > 3 years c) are very well known in the ecosystem d) have not had any funding rounds so far A good example would be @reubs_btc 's STX Tools, @instoppabile 's BNS One or @kai_builder 's STX City amongst many others. All three of them tick the boxes above. The current structure of Interim Grants rewards only future milestones, with a strong bias towards opensource. So if I was the "Grant Master", since stacks really likes to play with Communism in their wording ( Hello dear Committee) - So if I was the Grand Master I would do the following: 1/ retroactive funding. Here is a lump sum as a 'thank you' for building something everyone uses on Stacks. Buy yourself a new mouse, a new PC, get your wife out to dinner or put it on a down-payment for a car. I don't care - it's yours, you've earned it, enjoy it. No contract (!) 2/ upkeep cost coverage: Before even talking about milestones I would make sure that any upkeep costs involved with that project are taking care of. No contract (!) Those should include server costs and a medium salary for the team, to keep the lights running. If you think that's funny go ask how much people at the foundation make for posting on X as their main accomplishment. 3/ milestones: Now we can finally entertain talking about milestones (if there are any). Draft them up and lets discuss if a) they make sense and b) if yes - how much funding is needed. No guarantees for this one, and mutually beneficial contracts need to be signed if funding is awarded. That's it. Keep DeGrants for ideas, Interim Grants for a mix between ideas and mvp's and create a grant like this for people who have proven themselves on stacks. And here comes the kicker - no fucking committee I have to apply to, as if I was a 70's middle-aged Russian steelworker applying for a toaster - enough of that shit. The grant decision could be solely made by the @stackslabs CEO or a future CMO on a case by case basis. Or get the top 100 community members by mindshare and let them vote, because those are the people representing stacks - and if they are happy stacks will be at a much better place. And before the soy-boy "uhm, bro, what about legal" boys enter the chat, yes, it's legally possible to handle #1 and #2 even without a contract so leave me alone with your number one excuse. This is just a morning brain dump, it can be refined, polished, whatever. I just felt it's necessary to provide a solution the community would actually accept given the recent sentiment around the BNS issue. G/

@mcuevasm @Stacks @one_bns That doesn't matter, we are pulling our (DeGrants) application based on how a (Interim Grants) application has being handled. That hopefully makes sense now.

@stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns Got it, so just so everyone is clear, that is completely separate program run by and decided upon by community stewards. BNS One applied for an Interim Grant which is still in review.

After some consideration we have decided to revoke our application to @Stacks grants. We feel that projects which have a running product, such as @one_bns deserve not only more respect, but also a fast track to financing, including retroactive financial grants. If taking a grant means a forceful change of project milestones, having to entertain and respond to hostile 'opinions" before a 'committee' and potentially having to abide by 'open source' requests, then we don't want any part in this. This decision changes not our deadlines. Our current funding is sufficient and will keep us independent and fully operational. We really hope that the people in charge will take the community feedback on multiple issues regarding grants seriously and impose changes in the next round. CC/ @stackslabs x.com/TheOneNFT/stat…

@mcuevasm @Stacks @one_bns @jackbinswitch @DiegoMey @jsadlowe You are intentionally twisting our earlier statement to fit your narrative. We won't be commenting on this matter with you anymore.

@stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns @jackbinswitch @DiegoMey @jsadlowe I disagree that any pressure on milestones, especially with a goal of creating clarity and transparency and a maximization of impact, is a bad practice. Work needs to be clear and measurable, it's really that simple or you cannot have a functioning grant program.

@JakeBlockchain @Fleetz_ @mcuevasm @Stacks @one_bns @jackbinswitch @DiegoMey @jsadlowe Great, then Stacks should make that very clear in the application process

@Fleetz_ @mcuevasm @stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns @jackbinswitch @DiegoMey @jsadlowe Historically grants have been open source so everyone can benefit. If you want to run a for profit company with exclusive code, start a startup and raise funding. That’s been the traditional path and makes sense.

@mcuevasm @Stacks @one_bns We applied for DeGrants

@stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns Hey, I don't see a grant application or awarded grat in progress named with STX Watch in it but maybe its under a different name, could you link to it?

1/ We never stated BNS One has been rejected 2/ We never stated that most people who were going trough the process were not rewarded 3/ Different people have a different understanding on what is - or isn't disrespectful/hostile 4/ We advise anyone to read all the com's on the link provided by Mitchell and make up their own mind on who is telling the truth. In a perfect world a grant applicant provides milestones, those are discussed, and if needed modified in a minor way. Putting pressure on an applicant to make major changes to their own application milestones is bad practice, especially for a project as significant as BNS One. Some people will agree, other won't and that's perfectly normal, we've made our choice and wish everyone who applied for a grant all the best.

Hey team, could you please point out any hostile commentary to grant applicants? I haven't seen anything hostile from the committee (cc @jackbinswitch @DiegoMey @jsadlowe ), just lots of expected back and forth to dial in a scope of work everyone can be clear on. Most people who went through the process were awarded. Milestone have been done through open discussion with many of the teams appreciating the additional clarity this has brought their work. No one is *forced* into anything, grants have a structure to make sure the community sees value from it and that we agree on what's happening before we move. It's part due diligence, it's part normal business agreement anyone here would do if hiring someone to do something - none of it is disrespectful and is standard across the ecosystems we've researched. In fact, most grant programs issue a blank rejection to applications that aren't perfect right away without explanation whereas we try to work together to incorporate feedback from builders and the community on the grant. And to be really clear the BNS One team hasn't been rejected, we're working on milestones with them and all the folks involved have been super professional respectful with each other. You can see the commentary on Github: #issuecomment-3407475697" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/stacksgov/sip3…

@MooningSharkArt @Stacks @one_bns More power to the community.

@stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns Well said

@BrendynHadfield @Stacks @one_bns @binaya_btc @ETH_Lagartija Thank you Haddy, you're one of the good ones.

@stxwatch @Stacks @one_bns ✊💪 I am sorry that it has come to this. @one_bns and @stxwatch are great projects with incredible builders. CC: @binaya_btc @ETH_Lagartija