Surjit Bhalla

7.1K posts

Surjit Bhalla

Surjit Bhalla

@surjitbhalla

Former Executive Director, IMF for India, Bangladesh, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Economist, cricket junkie, policy wonk, and film (all woods, old and new) enthusiast

New Delhi, India Katılım Ocak 2013
639 Takip Edilen68.7K Takipçiler
Surjit Bhalla retweetledi
kuldip suri
kuldip suri@kuldipsurisView·
Surjit Bhalla lambasts the government: "Winning Elections, Losing the Economy In a hard-hitting interview with @govindethiraj on The Core Report, economist Dr. @surjitbhalla delivers a sharp critique of India's current economic policy direction despite strong political stability. Bhalla argues that India is facing a deep crisis of confidence. While inflation and current account deficits look better than the 2013 "Fragile Five" days, net FDI has collapsed — a direct result of the 2015 restrictive Model BIT and "Hotel California" clauses that made exit extremely difficult for foreign investors. He points out that the consequences of that 2015 policy shift are now fully visible in 2024-25 as old treaties expire. The problem isn't just foreign capital. Domestic capital is also fleeing due to retrospective tax fears, heavy-handed enforcement, and a surge in protectionist Quality Control Orders (QCOs) since 2017 that shield local players from competition. Bhalla criticizes the overly centralized, secretive decision-making process concentrated in the PMO — a far cry from the open debate that preceded the 1991 reforms. He notes that despite 30 years of talk, manufacturing's share in GDP refuses to rise because policy incentives remain flawed. His clear recommendations: 1. Immediately roll back FDI and BIT rules to the pre-2015 open framework. 2. Pass a permanent legislative ban on retrospective taxation. 3. Aggressively support and subsidize export-oriented companies, learning from South Korea, Vietnam, and Bangladesh. On the rupee hitting lows, Bhalla says a solo float without fixing fundamentals would be "stupid and suicidal." Fix the structural issues and confidence — and the currency — will return. A must-watch interview that raises uncomfortable but important questions about long-term economic direction. @PMOIndia Full interview: youtu.be/kzP_ZHA8tZU?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
17
37
4.8K
Surjit Bhalla retweetledi
Mohandas Pai
Mohandas Pai@TVMohandasPai·
PM @narendramodi Sir last year we imported 72b$ of gold ~750 tons.We have ~30000 tons of Gold in India.Recently GOI increased import taxes to 15%! This will increase corruption, smuggling, corruption! Instead please abolish Capital gains tax on sale of Gold by Resident Indians for 1 year.increase local supply-reduce imports. Even if 200 more tons is sold locally will reduce 15b$ of imports,strengthen Rupee. Big benefit Please consider We need Radical solutions. @nsitharaman @FinMinIndia @PMOIndia @NITIAayog @PiyushGoyal @AshwiniVaishnaw
Narendra Modi@narendramodi

Had a fruitful meeting of the Council of Ministers yesterday. We exchanged perspectives and best practices relating to boosting ‘Ease of Living, ‘Ease of Doing Business’ and how to further reforms in order to realise our shared dream of a Viksit Bharat.

English
91
256
949
106.6K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
You are right about me glossing over the Deep State - next article
Salman Soz@SalmanSoz

I have no problem in accepting your main argument that BJP is winning elections while losing the economy. On the economic substance, you are largely right. Given your support for Modi and team, this article will draw much attention. However... You set up a four-agent framework and then promptly walk away from it. The fourth agent, the puppeteer, gets introduced and quickly abandoned. We were waiting, Surjit. Because that is precisely where the real story lives. BJP's ability to win elections while presiding over economic underperformance rests on three things you barely touch: mainstream media now largely singing from the same hymn sheet; serious questions about electoral processes; weaponizing of public institutions against the opposition, and a financial resource asymmetry that can only be overcome in exceptional circumstances. These four reinforce each other in ways that make economic accountability impossible. And then the Gandhi family dig. Really? Congress's chalenges are a far more complex story. Some of the problems are internal, but many have to do with the institutional, media and financial asymmetries you gloss over. Blaming the Gandhis lets BJP off the hook for engineering a structurally uneven playing field. And, might I add, it is the Gandhis who give fearless voice to the frustration felt by so many in India about the issues that you feel have made India a member of the Fragile 2.

English
8
4
29
16.1K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
Bangladesh is the same per capita income as India - so not diverse - Ethiopia is much poorer than India and should grow faster - and it does; same logic applies to the disappointment with India - It is much richer than it was in 1991 yet continues to grow at the same rate - I could go on...
Raj Malhotra@Rajmalhotrachd

The Base-Effect Fallacy: The Bangladesh & Ethiopia Comparison: You argue that India must "dispense with the moniker of the fastest-growing major economy" because, since 2014, our per capita GDP growth in US dollars ranks 16th, lagging behind Bangladesh (1st at 8.3%) and Ethiopia (2nd at 7.2%). Sir, as an empirical economist, you are acutely aware of the "base effect" and the asymmetry of comparing vastly disparate economic denominators.

English
6
7
68
23.7K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
A very meaningful and relevant summary of what can, and should be done
SHAKSINGH@shaksingh

dear @narendramodi @nsitharaman @nsitharamanoffc It is important for us to listen to sane voices: a. Improve investor confidence India should make it easier and safer for foreign and domestic investors to invest. b. Reform the BIT framework The article specifically says India should restore treaty credibility and improve legal protection for investors. c. Reduce policy uncertainty Investors should not feel that rules can suddenly change or become hostile after they enter India. d. Stop over-reliance on incentives Instead of only giving subsidies, PLI-style schemes, or short-term support, India needs deeper reforms. e. Improve ease of doing business in real terms The writer is not talking about rankings only. He means actual ease: faster approvals, fewer disputes, predictable taxation, and better contract enforcement. f. Attract more FDI More FDI brings capital, technology, exports, jobs, and integration with global supply chains. g. Focus on reforms, not only political victory Electoral wins should be used to push serious economic reforms, not as proof that all policies are working.

English
8
6
23
15.5K
Ajay Rotti
Ajay Rotti@ajayrotti·
@maxi_ank @Puyangan5 @surjitbhalla It is wrong parallel to say the marriage needs a cooling off period of 5 years. It simply says try and work towards a divorce in the family courts. If you arent successful in resolution even after 5, go for arbitration. It never says no divorce for 5 years and stay married!!
English
1
0
2
95
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
Appreciate your comments; "Dr. Bhalla suggests that a five-year waiting period is unprecedented in history. Wrong, again. While I do not agree with the five-year waiting period, it is not wrong in law." couple of questions - even a 10 or 20 year period would not be wrong in law - correct? By unprecedented I meant no other country has initiated or recommended a five year cooling period? Is that incorrect? If so, which country or countries have had 5 years cooling period and when
Prabhash Ranjan@pranjan12781

I wish to point out some key conceptual errors in this piece on the issue of bilateral investment treaties (BITs): 1. The 2015 BIT that @surjitbhalla refers in this article is the 'Model' 2015 BIT. A Model BIT, on its own, is not binding on anyone, unless it is transformed into a 'treaty' by India and its treaty partners. A Model BIT is just a declaration of intent and policy of a country on what it would like to be included in a binding investment treaty. Yes, India has signed around 7 to 8 BITs based on the Model BIT. So, these provisions are relevant only for investors from these countries. 2. Dr. Bhalla says that the BIT requires a foreign investor to wait for five years before exiting an Indian venture. Incorrect. The five year requirement, mentioned in the Model BIT means that a foreign investor has to wait for five years before initiating a treaty-based arbitration against the Indian state. In simple terms, if a foreign investor has a dispute with the Indian state, it should first pursue domestic remedies for five years, before bringing a claim under the BIT. This has nothing to do with the foreign investor's domestic partner or an Indian company. A foreign investor uses the BIT to sue the host state because the treaty protects the investor from sovereign overreach. It is not to be used against a private players or an Indian company. Contract law or commercial arbitration can be used by the foreign investor against private partners. 3. Dr. Bhalla suggests that a five-year waiting period is unprecedented in history. Wrong, again. While I do not agree with the five-year waiting period, it is not wrong in law. Under customary international law, foreign investors are typically required to first exhaust local remedies. A BIT can contract out of this customary rule by either not requiring foreign investors to pursue local remedies or by shortening this period. India believes that this shortened period should be five-years whereas in many BITs this period could be 6 months or two years and some may require exhaustion of local remedies, irrespective of time taken, before a treaty claim can be brought. Economists should pay attention to understanding international law if they care to comment on international economic issues like FDI.

English
8
6
55
20.1K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
Indian Agents are in a deep comfort zone - sadly, that prohibits meaningful reform. The need for course correction was never larger; when die-hard optimists lose hope.... indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
Surjit Bhalla tweet media
English
189
653
1.7K
468K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
My public comments (in conferences, seminars, & in front of the PM, FM, PMO & others) for the last two years-a slide from the 3rd Kautilya Enclave Oct 4-6, 2024 · India major trap – Very restrictive FDI policy since 2017 · Foreign direct investment rates (% to GDP) have significantly declined since the abolition of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) which began in 2017; · Policy now is for FDI investment disputes to be settled in India, not third party. · India legal system is still at poor country level · Estimates suggest that about 30 % of the decline in FDI can be attributed to suspension of BITs. · FDI helps in not just adding to investment rates, but also significantly to innovation and technical change. We need to get back to status quo ex-ante at the earliest
Rajdeep Sardesai@sardesairajdeep

WATCH: Why is the Indian economy in a crisis and panic buttons being pressed? This discussion with @surjitbhalla and Dr Pranob Sen provides insights you won’t get in a mainstream media eco-system that mostly stays away from raising inconvenient questions. youtu.be/YC8NpifpCIQ?si…

English
22
63
177
48.8K
Surjit Bhalla
Surjit Bhalla@surjitbhalla·
Over the last six decades, I had heard a lot about Presidency College, Calcutta. Abundant collection of fine minds. I finally got a chance to visit the iconic institution; very very few on the campus mentioned Mamata as their choice. indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
Surjit Bhalla tweet media
English
11
25
72
5.7K
Surjit Bhalla retweetledi
Aimen Dean
Aimen Dean@AimenDean·
I genuinely don’t know whether to laugh or lose my mind anymore at this European hypocritical double standards. When it comes to Vladimir Putin, suddenly it’s Churchillian resolve. No compromise. No dialogue. Arm Ukraine to the teeth, sanction everything that moves, wreck your own energy security if necessary - because tyranny must be confronted. Fine. I actually respect the consistency of that … in isolation. But then you turn around and lecture us - us - the Gulf monarchies, Jordan and Israel, about showing restraint with Tehran? About dialogue? About coexistence? Are you serious? For forty years - forty bloody years - this regime has been waging a shadow war across the region. Militias, proxies, sleeper cells, terror networks, destabilizing entire countries - Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen - and threatening the Gulf monarchies, Jordan, and Israel nonstop. This isn’t theoretical. This isn’t abstract. This is lived reality. And yet here come Emmanuel Macron, Keir Starmer, and the rest of the European choir, gently advising us to calm down, de-escalate, and - what was it again? - “give diplomacy a chance.” Diplomacy with who, exactly? With a system that has built its entire regional strategy on plausible deniability and proxy terror violence? You were willing to absorb inflation, energy shocks, and political backlash at home to confront Moscow. You made that choice. You said: this is the price of standing up to a tyrant. So don’t come here and tell us - after decades of being on the receiving end - that we should just sit down, smile politely, and “coexist.” Either you believe in confronting tyranny everywhere .. or you don’t. Macron, Starmer, rest of EU leaders and top bureaucrats should just STFU and spare us the self righteous sanctimonious lectures!🤐🤫
English
1.7K
8.3K
31.1K
1M
Robby
Robby@robbymeranam·
@surjitbhalla Growth I followed, how will it help Rupee, the tax is not sent overseas.
English
1
0
0
368