Tan Lay

@JeremyLasne Could you clarify please - the part about “Study the niche” and the 99%… You’re saying 99% of people use instinct without studying? 1% of people study and don’t use instinct? Your reader should not use instinct? All the other points were clear! Thanks 😊

I'll save you 1,000 hours of marketing your mobile apps wrong. TL;DR No CTA → viral and broke. People are dumb tell them Study the niche before you post → instinct is 99% wrong. And no you are not that 1%. Organic before paid 🙏 don't rush or you'll go broke. (Ads on your organic winners) Track conversion nor views as major metric. Localize → target a country some convert way more (US is not the world) Personally guilty of half these. Sharing so you skip these.

@adensdk @eliadeleo Personally I probably would have called it 'The optimal way' instead of 'The lazy way' but.. I honestly loved the information.. thank you so much for sharing! 😁 One question: how come you stopped the KittyWeight content + stopped developing Jurney if it's still making money?

@eliadeleo Let me know what you think of the article! It’s my first one on X

If the other person makes you feel stupid.. … and you’re not stupid … isn’t that the easiest feeling for you to unfeel? #noticingtheobvious

@BasilTheGreat Think about it though. The reason it’s hilarious is that it looks human-like in some way 🙂

A Robot has gone viral after failing spectacularly to dance like Michael Jackson Hilarious 🤣🤣

The majority of life’s errors are caused by forgetting what one is trying to do. #noticingtheobviou

@CGTNOfficial @elonmusk Post the clip @elonmusk

Shoot, shoot, shoot! @elonmusk goes full 360° filming outside the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. #WorldNow #ChinaUS

Interesting thing I noticed: The claim that AI saves you time is true. A task that might require 30 minutes of manual work can now be done with 30 seconds of prompting. But… while you’re sipping beer and waiting, it can take the AI much longer than 30 mins to complete.

@timecaptales Play stupid games. Win stupid prizes .. in the short term… … less stupid prizes in the form of relatively fun memories in the long term 😁

One of the greatest bits that 'Jackass' ever did

A lot of people wonder how to get rid of imposter syndrome. Not many people wonder how to stop being an imposter. #noticingtheobvious

Noticing the Obvious and 🤍 Celebrating the peace! 🤍

@robinhanson It looks like I may probably assign a 49% chance to myself picking the right answer.

What chance do you assign to that sentence being true?

Lost tenure for publishing this sentence: “Results converge on genetics as a potential partial explanation for group mean differences in intelligence.”

@Hartdrawss Honest question : Would “Create maximally efficient code with the cleanest architecture” direct the AI to make its own decision on what components to separate, in addition to other hacks that I may not have thought to add?

Vibe Coding PRO TIP : Inside your CLAUDE. md / AGENTS. md, add this : "Never create a component longer than 150 lines. If it exceeds this, split it into smaller components automatically. Always separate UI from logic." > Most frontends become unmaintainable because every screen is 800+ line component > This single rule forces clean architecture without you thinking about it.

@aakashgupta “Coordination tools”? “Tools that coordinate the builders?”

Everyone's comparing vibe coding tools on speed. Replit is playing a completely different game. Lovable just crossed $400M ARR. Cursor passed $2B. Both optimized for the same variable: how fast can one person ship software alone? Agent 4 is a bet that solo building hits a ceiling. Look at the feature list: infinite canvas for generating design variants, parallel agents working different parts of the same project, real-time team collaboration baked into the core loop. Every other vibe coding tool treats building as a single-player game. Replit is building the multiplayer version. This tells you exactly how Amjad views the next phase. When AI handles execution, the hard problem becomes "which version should we build and why?" Lovable shipping 100,000 projects per day means 100,000 projects per day that nobody reviewed, designed intentionally, or pressure-tested before going live. Speed without coordination produces volume. Speed with coordination produces products. The vertical integration makes this bet possible in a way competitors can't replicate quickly. Replit owns the entire stack: design canvas, build agents, database, auth, hosting, deployment. Cursor needs you to deploy somewhere else. Lovable hands off to GitHub for anything complex. Replit keeps the whole workflow inside one environment, which is the only architecture where "parallel agents on the same project" actually works without breaking everything. 85% of Fortune 500 already have teams on Replit. At $240M revenue with 150,000 paying customers, the average customer spends roughly $1,600/year. The $1B target for 2026 means either tripling customer count or tripling spend per customer. Enterprise teams do both simultaneously, which is exactly why Agent 4 leads with collaboration instead of raw speed. Individual builders pick the fastest tool. Teams pick the most integrated one. Replit is betting the market moves toward teams. And if AI makes everyone a builder, the number of teams that need coordination tools goes vertical.

@AbdMuizAdeyemo @aakashgupta “Deciding what should exist at all” That’s the “gold” 🙂

@aakashgupta That is the deeper bet. When AI makes building fast, the real bottleneck becomes alignment, coordination, and deciding what should exist at all. The tools that win long term may be the ones built for teams, not just solo speed.

@DaveShapi “execution speed and reach is going to be based upon things like reputation and trust.” That’s the thing .. execution speed and reach USED to be based on reputation and trust. Now… execution and reach can BUILD reputation and trust.

This will be very interesting because, yes, the barrier of entry is going to drop. But that means every TAM is going to be saturated very quickly. And the only moat will be execution speed and reach, which is going to be based upon things like reputation and trust. And ultimately, the margins will collapse for most of the startups, and they will consolidate.

Nothing wrong with virtue signaling. In fact LOTS of things right with virtue signaling. Everyone should display virtue. Something IS wrong with LAZY virtue signaling. Something IS wrong with lying (ie creating the illusion of virtue and signaling that)

@cryptopunk7213 My takeaways from this post. 1. Yes, this IS the craziest story I’ve read today. 2. “TODAY!!!!” The fact that we’re all fully expecting some other news just as mindblowing tomorrow .. Are human brains really built to comprehend this much change this frequently?

craziest story you'll read today. they turned human cells into an LLM. > scientists grew 200,000 human cells on an AI chip and taught them how to play DOOM on a computer. demo below is 100% real. > the cells learn, adapt and self-organize with (almost) ZERO energy required (human brain runs on 20 watts) > why do this? because cells adapt WAY QUICKER (18X) than silicon and use less energy. > it gets better - team has started growing cells on AI models, cells choose which word the AI generates next > the device that fuses the cells to silicon costs $35K and leverages a multi-modal array if we can figure out how to scale this then we unlock a completely diff chip design architecture and MUCH cheaper way to use LLMs.

What machines get out of the world = 'electricity' What humans imagine and write movies about what machines get out of the world = 'Self preservation, power, destruction of other lesser species' etc.. etc #ai

Two views: 1.⁠ ⁠"Humanity has been on a continuous journey of improvement. I can work for stuff, so the future is good." 2.⁠ ⁠"Humanity is a static block of bad. Make me the king today, give me all the stuff, then the future is good."

@fitAmerican60 @stats_feed Yes! American consumers have had their needs fulfilled by products and services delivered by China and India. To 'reverse it' you could try to help the American middle class create products and services that China and India consumes.

🌍 Top 10 contributors to global real GDP growth (2026) 1．🇨🇳 China — 26.6% 2．🇮🇳 India — 17.0% 3．🇺🇸 United States — 9.9% 4．🇮🇩 Indonesia — 3.8% 5．🇹🇷 Türkiye — 2.2% 6．🇳🇬 Nigeria — 1.5% 7．🇧🇷 Brazil — 1.5% 8．🇻🇳 Vietnam — 1.6% 9．🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia — 1.7% 10．🇩🇪 Germany — 0.9% 📌 China + India alone = 43.6% of global growth 📌 Asia-Pacific accounts for ~50% of total growth Source: IMF