Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)

1.7K posts

Tascha (@Infinit_Labs) banner
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)

Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)

@tascha_panpan

Founder @Infinit_Labs & Alpha Finance | @UCBerkeley alum | @HarvardHBS dropout | Building DeFi & AI

Katılım Mart 2020
784 Takip Edilen23.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
DeFi remains a core pillar of @INFINIT_Labs ecosystem, the foundation where we’ve proven our agent coordination technology. But it won’t be the only pillar as we scale. Our vision extends beyond DeFi, into the broader landscape of fintech and traditional finance, towards a future shaped by Agentic Finance. Finance today is still built on systems that assume humans will do everything manually. But the world is moving too fast for that. Agentic Finance is the next evolution. It’s not about new tools, but new coordination. AI agents that understand context, execute logic, and bridge DeFi, fintech, and TradFi seamlessly. That’s where finance becomes truly efficient, transparent, and intelligent. It will take time. But when that time comes, INFINIT will already have the groundwork built, understanding the systems, pain points, and demands across both fintech and TradFi. And this is already happening. INFINIT and key strategic partnerships are being made, and more will be announced soon. Change takes time, and that’s why we start early. To build the rails for the Agentic Finance era, one layer at a time.
English
93
14
186
11.6K
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Interesting article. As tech and agents advance this quickly, it feels almost ironic that we’re right back to the basics. The interface becomes generated on the fly. Software becomes commoditized. And suddenly the things that actually matter are distribution, real relationships, data flywheels, and everything that can’t be instantly replicated by code. The more advanced the tech gets… the more we circle back to fundamentals.
Mustufa Khan@mustufa4socials

x.com/i/article/2049…

English
1
0
5
338
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Fair point... the failure did come from the centralized parts. But even in “trustless code” setups, when something big breaks we still see the same blame game and no real resolution. Curious: how do we actually get to that fully battle-tested state without humans in the loop at all?
English
1
0
1
26
0xmt
0xmt@08xmt·
@tascha_panpan The point of failure was there because the system was centralized. The decentralized parts had no fault. It's the correct conclusion that humans should not run a decentralized world. It should be run by battle tested, trustless code.
English
1
0
2
27
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
The recent Kelp hack and the whole 'resolving the incident via donations' makes me wonder whether we have been too idealistic about decentralization and DeFi in general. We pushed hard for pure trustless systems with no central control. But when things go wrong, there’s rarely anyone clearly accountable. No authority, no real liability. Devs say the tech works as intended. And it just turns into a blame game between the team, auditors, users, bridge, whoever. Maybe humans are just not the right players to run a decentralized world altogether? What do you all think?
English
5
0
5
485
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
@DismalDefi True, bad code gets exploited and code improves over time. The part that still worries me is the aftermath... even when the code is “working as intended,” the lack of any accountability or clear fix still leaves everything stuck.
English
1
0
0
15
DismalDeFi
DismalDeFi@DismalDefi·
@tascha_panpan You are relying on code. Bad code was always going to get hacked. How humans deal with hacks of bad code doesn’t really matter. The code improves until it can be trusted.
English
1
0
1
30
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
@_SmokinTed I think it probably lands somewhere in the middle. 80/20 hybrid feels like the pragmatic outcome. Pure DeFi ideals are beautiful in theory, but the incidents keep showing where the gaps still are. Would love to see more real examples of that hybrid working well at scale.
English
0
0
1
14
Smokin Ted
Smokin Ted@_SmokinTed·
@tascha_panpan it's a spectrum that will resolve ultimately into 80% hybrid solution of CeFi/onchain finance and 20% original DeFi principles
English
1
0
1
23
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Excited to be back in Vietnam for Conviction 2026 🇻🇳 The community continues to grow rapidly and the energy is always strong. Looking forward to sharing updates on AI agents and the future of on-chain trading. See you in Ho Chi Minh City this August. Thanks @Convictionvn for having me back!
Conviction@Convictionvn

Following her inspiring keynote last year on how Agents will shape the future of DeFi, Conviction 2026 is thrilled to welcome back a visionary leader: Tascha Punyaneramitdee (@tascha_panpan) – Founder & CEO, @Infinit_Labs A UC Berkeley alumna and serial entrepreneur with a background in investment banking across San Francisco and London, Tascha has a proven track record in scaling massive Web3 projects. After founding Alpha Finance, which reached over $1.9B in AUM, she is now leading INFINIT, an AI application for Web3 financial execution that has facilitated over 670,000 on-chain agent transactions and $25 million of value. Returning to the Conviction stage this year, Tascha will provide expert insights into leveraging AI agents for financial strategy and how this technology is revolutionizing on-chain trading innovation. Stay tuned for pioneering insights on the intersection of AI and Web3 from the Founder of INFINIT at Conviction 2026!

English
2
2
39
3.2K
Nick Sawinyh
Nick Sawinyh@sawinyh·
@tascha_panpan @money2020 agentic finance is where it gets genuinely weird. most financial infra assumes a human is making the decision, the moment that breaks everything downstream breaks too
English
1
0
2
34
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Thank you @Money2020 for having me at Money20/20 Asia conference! It was a pleasure speaking on Agentic Finance - what happens when AI becomes a financial actor. We’ve designed financial systems for humans for decades. Now we’re building ones where AI agents can act autonomously. I believe this shift goes far beyond efficiency. It changes how we think about trust, identity, and liability. And we have a long way to go in figuring this out as an industry. Looking forward to building out the next phase of agentic finance.
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs) tweet mediaTascha (@Infinit_Labs) tweet mediaTascha (@Infinit_Labs) tweet mediaTascha (@Infinit_Labs) tweet media
English
1
1
12
586
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Speaking next week at @Money2020 Asia 2026 🇹🇭 This time, the conversation goes a step further: Agentic Finance – What happens when AI becomes a financial actor? As AI moves from tool to decision-maker, its role in financial systems fundamentally changes. How we think about trust, control, and financial systems needs to evolve as well. I’ll be sharing a few perspectives on what this shift means in practice. 🗓 Wednesday, 22 April 2026 ⏰ 13:55 – 14:45 📍 Queen Sirikit National Convention Center 🎟 Limited passes available (link in comments) If you’re attending, would love to connect.
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs) tweet media
English
2
2
17
813
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
Interesting to see both perspectives surface so publicly. Many people likely saw Chaos Labs’ announcement first and formed an initial view from there. This post from @StaniKulechov adds important context from Aave’s side, especially around the risk framework, the two-layer model, and why certain proposals didn’t move forward. In situations like this, the full picture usually matters more than the first headline. Worth reading both sides carefully.
Stani@StaniKulechov

We respect the decision of Chaos Labs to step down as one of the two risk managers for the Aave DAO. We want to thank Chaos Labs for their work over the years. They have been a valuable partner to the Aave DAO, and their contributions have helped Aave grow and mature. There is no disruption to the Aave Protocol, its smart contracts, asset listings, or network deployments, and we will work closely with Chaos Labs during the offboarding process. Aave operates with a two-layer economic risk model that has been managed by Chaos Labs and LlamaRisk. While this model does create tension between risk managers from time to time, we believe it has been valuable in safeguarding Aave. We strongly support maintaining a two-layer approach and will continue supporting this model, alongside an additional technical risk layer managed by Aave Labs. Over the past weeks, we held discussions with the Chaos team regarding next steps, as Chaos was exploring winding down its risk consultancy services business (and had already begun winding down some agreements with other protocols). We were generally supportive of a 2× increase in their risk management payment to $5M, but not supportive of $8M without a separate addendum at a later stage if the workload proved higher than anticipated. What we did not support were other elements of the proposal, including setting Chaos Labs as the sole risk manager and using Chaos Labs price oracles instead of Chainlink on all new deployments, as well as adopting Chaos Labs vaults as the default vaults (which are not yet audited) for all B2B integrations. While we do not see issues with these Chaos products or their future viability, we strongly believe that, given the scale of the Aave protocol, it should maintain at least a two-layer risk management model and vendor lock-in free vaults. Additionally, given the strong track record with Chainlink, we prefer to continue supporting Chainlink for price oracles, which our users are currently more comfortable with at scale. Regarding Aave V4, the architecture introduces isolated risk markets through Spokes, new liquidation logic, and governance-controlled parameters that give the DAO more granular control over how it manages risk across different markets and assets. We held multiple risk calls with Chaos Labs employees in attendance well before V4 went live, and the feedback we received during those sessions does not align with the concerns expressed in their post. For the immediate future, Aave Labs will work closely with LlamaRisk to ensure a smooth transition and uninterrupted risk coverage for the protocol. LlamaRisk already serves as a risk contributor to the Aave DAO and has deep familiarity with the protocol’s architecture and parameters. We support LlamaRisk increasing their budget to accommodate this additional workload and expanding their team as needed. Aave Labs will also contribute engineering and analytical resources wherever necessary to support this transition. We also want to thank the entire Chaos Labs team for their contributions over the years, as they have helped bring the protocol we built into its current level of maturity.

English
1
0
6
718
Conviction
Conviction@Convictionvn·
Following her inspiring keynote last year on how Agents will shape the future of DeFi, Conviction 2026 is thrilled to welcome back a visionary leader: Tascha Punyaneramitdee (@tascha_panpan) – Founder & CEO, @Infinit_Labs A UC Berkeley alumna and serial entrepreneur with a background in investment banking across San Francisco and London, Tascha has a proven track record in scaling massive Web3 projects. After founding Alpha Finance, which reached over $1.9B in AUM, she is now leading INFINIT, an AI application for Web3 financial execution that has facilitated over 670,000 on-chain agent transactions and $25 million of value. Returning to the Conviction stage this year, Tascha will provide expert insights into leveraging AI agents for financial strategy and how this technology is revolutionizing on-chain trading innovation. Stay tuned for pioneering insights on the intersection of AI and Web3 from the Founder of INFINIT at Conviction 2026!
Conviction tweet media
English
3
3
12
3.6K
主任
主任@zhuren1992·
@tascha_panpan History's cycles remind us to build with resilience, not just react to change.
English
1
0
1
17
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
@ajxbuild Exactly. Once you see it, it’s hard to unsee. It changes how you interpret everything else.
English
0
0
0
15
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs)@tascha_panpan·
@_SmokinTed Yes. The structure changes, but the underlying behavior doesn’t move as quickly. Thanks for the recommendation, will check it out.
English
0
0
1
15
Smokin Ted
Smokin Ted@_SmokinTed·
@tascha_panpan human nature - the one constant, at least on the timeframes that we are looking at. exactly why they say history often rhymes, as it's being executed by the same nature Laws of Human Nature by Robert Greene is another fantastic read
English
1
0
1
25
Tascha (@Infinit_Labs) retweetledi
INFINIT
INFINIT@Infinit_Labs·
INFINIT has regained full control of the @Infinit_Labs account. It is now safe to interact with. Unauthorized tweets earlier are removed. The app was NOT affected at any point. The X account security review is complete. Thank you all who flagged the issue and stayed safe.
English
24
2
37
1.9K