Tchaiku
516 posts












You’ve probably heard the claim that the “eastern” ancestry showing up in Imperial Roman-era Central Italy came directly from the Middle East. But in reality, most of it seems to have come through the Aegean, from the ancient Greeks, rather than being a direct Levantine input. Only a minority of the eastern admix came from the Levant. In fact, the new Roman-era Greeks from Tenea (Corinthia) seem to be almost the same genetically to one-third of Imperial Rome DNA samples, and they also show up as the biggest contributor in the Iron Age Italian admixed cluster. So in Imperial Central Italy you mainly see two genetic profiles: (1) an Aegean/Greek-like cluster (2) a Graeco-Italian genetic profile of Aegean (Greek) mixed with Iron Age Italian, where the Aegean part can be well-proxied by ancient Greeks like Roman-era Tenea. pastebin.com/qwtVXzkp




Remembering in 2022 when I politely pushed back on the Southern Arc hypothesis, and suggested Harvard didn't have proper evidence of the alleged sub-Caucasian source of PIE and that they had ignored Sredny Stog. Then loads of brown people said I was "coping" or "crashing out". Then in 2024 when the same authors published a paper debunking their own claims and showing Sredny Stog was indeed, as I had suggested, the original PIE culture, there was not one among my detractors decent enough to admit "Rowsell was right".























