𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗔𝗜
𝗜𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁
There was a time when coding meant hitting a wall... and opening 5 tabs of Stack Overflow, desperately searching for that one green-ticked answer from 2012
Before ChatGPT, Claude, or DeepSeek, there was only one place where we could:
• Find that one missing semicolon
• Decode that cryptic error message
• Copy that perfectly working code snippet (with fingers crossed)
Every developer's journey was incomplete without silently whispering, "God bless this person," to some anonymous hero who posted the exact solution you needed
Today, we just ask AI for instant help
But here's the twist:
Every AI helping you code was trained on Stack Overflow's data
That regex ChatGPT just wrote? Learned from Stack Overflow
Claude's debugging advice? Trained on millions of SO answers
DeepSeek's code suggestions? Fed Stack Overflow's knowledge base
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗔𝗜 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘁
Ultimate "I raised you" moment in tech history.
End of an era. Start of a new one.
What's your most memorable Stack Overflow save?
AI will split companies into two camps.
Value Preservation — using AI to cut costs.
Value Creation — using AI to grow revenue.
Value Creation companies will be the ones hiring more people because of AI. Which kind of company do you work at?
The way AI is sold right now is a recipe for addiction. It gives you rewards of semi-random quality, after semi-random wait times, and just when you're deepest in the flow, it can cut you off for hours.
We're the rats and these are obviously the pellets.
@staysaasy the incentive to generate more code and the incentive to generate good code are not the same incentive. worth thinking about who designed the benchmark.
I wonder if coding models are specifically designed to increase lines of code because otherwise companies would have a much harder time actually proving its worth the cost.
Linus Tech Tips called out YouTube's new 30-second unskippable ads on the TV app, asking
"When will it be enough? Are we just going to go all the way back to cable TV with three-minute ad breaks? Can we not?"
@xoaanya asking this is like asking if knowing how to drive is more valuable than knowing how an engine works. depends on what you're trying to do. but if the engine breaks you'll wish you knew both.
@JuliaEMcCoy true in theory. in practice the people with better prompting skills, faster internet, and time to experiment are still pulling ahead faster
AI is the greatest equalizer in human history. It doesn’t care about your zip code, your skin color, your degree, or your last name. It only cares about what you do with it.
Hot take - LinkedIn is for nice people.
Not saying that's always best but the community here shocks me with how critical they are of... everything.
Garry Tan makes some skills and instead of talking about it, people just bash it.
Company launches some CMO AI thing - all posts I saw were shitting all over it.
Meanwhile on LinkedIn the comments and replies are all surprisingly encouraging.
NVIDIA's DLSS 5 announcement at GTC 2026 surprised even the studios featured in its showcase.
Developers from Ubisoft and Capcom reportedly learned about the full generative AI details at the same time as the public.
"We found out at the same time as the public," said one Ubisoft developer.
@tech_finds_@Pirat_Nation As an artist myself, can you kindly fuck off. If gamers gave a damn about artists we wouldn't have 90% of all games being over 100gb and taking 7 plus years to make.
Veteran game developer JP Kellams pushed back on anti-AI slop criticism:
“If DLSS 5 was shown as a next-gen hardware reveal and not AI, you guys would be going nuts.”
I genuinely think AI companions will become more emotionally important to millions of people than some of their actual friends. Not because humans are obsolete, but because most people are tired, distracted, flaky, and bad at listening.
Is that dystopian or just honest?
nvidia just announced generative ai will now complete your game frames for you
the gpu renders the skeleton. ai invents the rest.
jensen huang says this will spread to every industry
maybe. or maybe that's just what you say when you sell the hardware.
the people actually making the games aren't impressed.
@Adriksh senior engineers aren't expensive because they write better code. they're expensive because they've seen what happens when you don't think before you build
everyone is hyping up ai coding agents, but nobody is talking about the fact that we are giving infinite code generation tools to developers who have absolutely no idea how to architect a database.
we are about to create the most unmaintainable legacy tech debt in human history