TechFreedom

16.9K posts

TechFreedom banner
TechFreedom

TechFreedom

@TechFreedom

A tech policy think tank. We embrace change, pushing back against technocrats who fear it & reactionaries who would control it. Inquiries: [email protected]

Washington, DC, USA Katılım Eylül 2010
1.9K Takip Edilen12.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
.@BrendanCarrFCC is weaponizing the “public interest” standard against viewpoints he dislikes. Such jawboning violates the First Amendment, due process, and the rule of law. 75+ civil society groups & free speech experts joined us in this coalition letter 🧵
TechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet media
English
1
8
20
3.1K
TechFreedom retweetledi
Tech Policy Podcast
Tech Policy Podcast@TechPolicyPdcst·
Cox v. Sony is out! An ISP is not liable for copyright claims if it “merely provid[es] a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights.” For expert analysis, check out our episode on the oral argument with @PamelaSamuelson.
Tech Policy Podcast tweet mediaTech Policy Podcast tweet media
English
1
3
2
217
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
🗓️ Register for our in-person event on Monday, March 30 (12–2 PM). Join @TechFreedom & Georgetown Law’s Tech Institute for a discussion on how the First Amendment limits the FTC’s powers, particularly as it ramps up investigations into media & tech over alleged political bias.
TechFreedom tweet media
English
1
0
0
185
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
📢 Let's clear the air: There’s a lot of misinformation about Section 230. The reality is that today's user-driven Internet simply wouldn't exist without it. As we mark the 30th anniversary of the law that helped create the Internet, we're debunking some common misconceptions.
TechFreedom tweet media
English
0
1
3
382
TechFreedom retweetledi
TechFreedom retweetledi
TechFreedom retweetledi
TechFreedom retweetledi
Corbin K. Barthold
Corbin K. Barthold@corbinkbarthold·
Are AI outputs free speech under the First Amendment? Yes. AI is polling down there with ICE and the Democratic Party. Meanwhile, I'm like Butters in South Park, unironically marveling at how awesome it is. So maybe I'm just asking for a ratio, but I wrote a whole big paper arguing that AI outputs deserve First Amendment protection. The case has little to do with whether you like AI, and a lot to do with how scared you should be of letting the government control what AI says. I threw a ton into this thing, and I hope my law nerds will read it all. Link and some highlights below.
Corbin K. Barthold tweet media
English
9
17
66
22.2K
TechFreedom retweetledi
Society of Professional Journalists
SPJ joins a coalition led by @TechFreedom in a letter condemning FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s latest threats against broadcasters as unconstitutional intimidation, particularly amid the administration’s call for treason prosecutions. 🔗Read more: bit.ly/3Nhm7nv
Society of Professional Journalists tweet media
English
0
4
5
507
TechFreedom retweetledi
Andy Jung
Andy Jung@AndyJungTech·
My full statement on the National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence:
Andy Jung tweet media
Director Michael Kratsios@mkratsios47

Today, the @WhiteHouse released a commonsense National AI Policy Framework that ensures every American benefits from AI. As @POTUS has said — we need one federal AI policy, not a 50 state patchwork. This gets us there. Eager to work with Congress on this important legislation.

English
1
2
9
813
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
See the coalition letter we and 70+ groups and First Amendment experts sent to the Commission in September over Carr's threats against Jimmy Kimmel techfreedom.org/wp-content/upl…
English
0
0
0
84
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
6) practice what Carr himself said in 2019: “The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speechin the name of the ‘public interest.’”
English
1
0
0
85
TechFreedom
TechFreedom@TechFreedom·
.@BrendanCarrFCC is weaponizing the “public interest” standard against viewpoints he dislikes. Such jawboning violates the First Amendment, due process, and the rule of law. 75+ civil society groups & free speech experts joined us in this coalition letter 🧵
TechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet mediaTechFreedom tweet media
English
1
8
20
3.1K