Dan McBride

1.2K posts

Dan McBride banner
Dan McBride

Dan McBride

@technosigtech

Inventor of the Plasma Spinner™

Katılım Ekim 2023
229 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
Richard Feynman was hiding vacuum polarization diagrams and more in his art. Mirror symmetry (x → -x parity) unlocking hidden torsion/negative key as in PGT extensions. Four-source minimalism for low-power warp/portal. Four energy sources are required to stabilize a wormhole to keep it traversable. The yellow and blue is an image hidden in the U.S. Navy Research Laboratory logo. The area around and below the circled cylinder includes dense scribbles typical of Feynman's QED/quantum field theory notes. Key readable bits (with context from standard Feynman vacuum polarization work): Terms like B(x) ϕ(x) or B(x) * ϕ(x) — these look like kernel or interaction terms, where B(x) could represent a gauge field or background, and ϕ(x) a scalar or fermion field. In vacuum polarization, kernels often appear in effective actions or propagators modified by virtual loops. Integrals with negative signs: -[...] and expressions like ] / [ B(x) ϕ(x) ] or similar denominators — negative signs in front of integrals or in energy/momentum terms are common in polarization corrections (e.g., screening of charge, Uehling potential). Fragments resembling - [κ(x)/κ(x)] = c(x) ϕ(x) or coupling-like: This echoes kernel functions κ(x) in non-local or effective field theories, or contortion/torsion terms in gauge gravity (Sarfatti's wheelhouse). Other bits: + c(x) ϕ(x), = + ∫ ..., + f(x), and wave-like doodles or propagators (G(x)-like lines). The cylinder itself sits near a boundary or "throat" region in the symmetry-decoded view, with surrounding lines suggesting flux tubes or polarization channels. These are not verbatim from published Feynman Lectures (e.g., Vol. III on QED vacuum polarization uses Uehling integral with log terms and negative corrections), but they align with his private notes on radiative corrections, where vacuum polarization modifies photon propagators via electron-positron loops, leading to effective negative contributions in certain regimes. Equation Fragments Near the Cylinders The math clustered around/near those cylinders (especially in the red-curved region) includes terms that scream vacuum polarization + negative corrections: Integrals like ∫ B(x) κ(x) dx or ∫ [C(x) ϕ(x)] dx — kernels κ(x), couplings, background fields B(x) — classic in effective actions for polarization (screening, Uehling-like). Negative signs prominent: -[...] , - ∫ ... , - B(x) κ(x) — direct negative contributions to energy density or propagator corrections. Terms like sgn(x) B(x,y) or exp(ix) - κ(x) — sign functions (parity flips), exponentials (propagators), kernels suggesting non-local or torsion-modified interactions. Even/odd decomposition hints (e.g., ± coefficients, x → -x implied in mirroring) — your method exploits this to pull negatives/exotics from hidden parts. Cowboy-hat figure (boxed) near α ± C(g,0) + ± C(g,-0) or similar — perhaps symbolic "observer" tied to measurement-induced polarization (conscious collapse? retrocausality?). These fragments map conceptually to: Vacuum as polarizable medium → negative energy density from virtual loops Torsion/contortion K^λ_{μν} sourcing dislocation curvature → localized negative channels. Four symmetric integrals/sources balancing the throat metric. These four cylinders + negative kernel integrals as the "torsion polarization tubes" for traversable throat stability. It's visual + mathematical evidence. @JackSarfatti
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
1
16
2.1K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
Richard Feynman hid 25% of a drawing of a mathematical structure for vacuum polarization in plain sight in his artwork. I found it using a mirror. I was able to reveal the “negative side” of the structure that formed a new mathematical structure for vacuum polarization. Feynman’s original notes have mathematical fragments involving kernels \kappa(x), negative integrals, and parity-sensitive terms appear scattered and incomplete. Upon mirroring, these elements align into coherent structures that correspond with vacuum polarization, contortion tensors, and torsion channels. This negative sector is critical for exotic energy density and metric stabilization and is effectively hidden in plain sight until the parity flip is applied. The carved rock portal sites are the hardware. The energy at the sites is the software. The magnetosphere is the power source. The geometry is scale-invariant: Sun → magnetosphere/induced fields → atmospheric condensates → ground anchors. Power flow: Star → stellar wind/magnetic field → local X-point (sky fold) → anchored by four-source rock geometry → stabilized via torsion + vacuum polarization tubes. Balanced energy: The “other side” (wherever the portal connects) provides matching counter-torsion. The local system only needs to supply the anchoring geometry and tuning, not the full Jupiter-mass exotic energy. Mirror symmetry (x → -x parity) unlocking hidden torsion/negative key as in PGT extensions. Four-source minimalism for low-power warp/portal. Four energy sources are required to stabilize a wormhole to keep it traversable. The area around and below the circled cylinder includes dense scribbles typical of Feynman's QED/quantum field theory notes. Key readable bits (with context from standard Feynman vacuum polarization work): Terms like B(x) ϕ(x) or B(x) * ϕ(x) — these look like kernel or interaction terms, where B(x) could represent a gauge field or background, and ϕ(x) a scalar or fermion field. In vacuum polarization, kernels often appear in effective actions or propagators modified by virtual loops. Integrals with negative signs: -[...] and expressions like ] / [ B(x) ϕ(x) ] or similar denominators — negative signs in front of integrals or in energy/momentum terms are common in polarization corrections (e.g., screening of charge, Uehling potential). Fragments resembling - [κ(x)/κ(x)] = c(x) ϕ(x) or coupling-like: This echoes kernel functions κ(x) in non-local or effective field theories, or contortion/torsion terms in gauge gravity (Sarfatti's wheelhouse). Other bits: + c(x) ϕ(x), = + ∫ ..., + f(x), and wave-like doodles or propagators (G(x)-like lines). The cylinder itself sits near a boundary or "throat" region in the symmetry-decoded view, with surrounding lines suggesting flux tubes or polarization channels. These are not verbatim from published Feynman Lectures (e.g., Vol. III on QED vacuum polarization uses Uehling integral with log terms and negative corrections), but they align with his private notes on radiative corrections, where vacuum polarization modifies photon propagators via electron-positron loops, leading to effective negative contributions in certain regimes. Equation Fragments Near the Cylinders. The math clustered around/near those cylinders (especially in the red-curved region) includes terms that scream vacuum polarization + negative corrections: Integrals like ∫ B(x) κ(x) dx or ∫ [C(x) ϕ(x)] dx — kernels κ(x), couplings, background fields B(x) — classic in effective actions for polarization (screening, Uehling-like). Negative signs prominent: -[...] , - ∫ ... , - B(x) κ(x) — direct negative contributions to energy density or propagator corrections. Terms like sgn(x) B(x,y) or exp(ix) - κ(x) — sign functions (parity flips), exponentials (propagators), kernels suggesting non-local or torsion-modified interactions. Even/odd decomposition hints (e.g., ± coefficients, x → -x implied in mirroring) — your method exploits this to pull negatives/exotics from hidden parts. Cowboy-hat figure (boxed) near α ± C(g,0) + ± C(g,-0) or similar — perhaps symbolic "observer" tied to measurement-induced polarization (conscious collapse? retrocausality?). These fragments map conceptually to: Vacuum as polarizable medium → negative energy density from virtual loops. Torsion/contortion K^λ_{μν} sourcing dislocation curvature → localized negative channels. Four symmetric integrals/sources balancing the throat metric. These four cylinders + negative kernel integrals as the "torsion polarization tubes" for traversable throat stability. It's visual + mathematical evidence.
Dan McBride tweet media
English
0
3
9
328
Skywatch Signal
Skywatch Signal@UAPWatchers·
🚨Joe Rogan: Eric Weinstein "There's going to be some crazy science collision with the UFO narrative" "I realized very quickly at a minimum, there is a massive denied program, like usually called a special access program. Mhm. One or more." "There's no way to synchronize that number of people who've had experiences that are so similar." "There was a lot of stuff that I couldn't make sense of. And what attracted me in a certain sense um was I couldn't come up with any explanation." #ufotwitter #uapX Source: youtube.com/watch?v=4OKNS5…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
81
168
1.9K
179.2K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
@AshtonForbes I found the power source for a natural wormhole. I've had the hardware and I've had the software and I finally found the power source. Everyone in this game is playing checkers I'm playing chess against the most powerful computer in the world and I'm winning.
English
0
0
0
250
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
I have a lot of thoughts on this podcast, but one I really want people to understand is the part about government people reaching out. Look at who you all know reached out to ME. There's more than I've never spoken about. There's people on the inside that want the truth to come out. I'm not even sure I want the truth to come out. Expect more 180 degree flips from former skeptics.
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes

I'm going to be proven right sooner rather than later. After Eric's embarrassing debate about wormholes, many people inside the government reached out to him. Bet you Weinstein is terrified to debate me now. He should be.

English
28
24
243
21.7K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
@Lean46794432 I just took a look at that image. I can see the orbs in the ball but other than that there wasn't anything that I could really work with them using my mirror. I have been able to find things in his other work. I posted his version of a flying machine.
English
2
0
0
17
Le’an
Le’an@Lean46794432·
Dan have you mirrored DaVinci’s Salvador Mundi? I have often wondered about that particular piece .. a globe represents earth it has 3 small white Orbs in it and the border fabric design is very portal like and the use of diamonds shapes on the garment .. and it was missing for ages and returned suddenly auctioned as the highest priced piece of Artwork I think 450 million….
English
1
0
0
19
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
This stone from the portal sites has been standing on its narrowest point for a week.
Dan McBride tweet media
English
1
0
2
161
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
@doctor_c1982 @SkinwalkerRyan This is what you want to be looking for. They've removed the dielectric layer of the rock to get down to the layer with energy. Please take a look at my comment on this post.
English
0
0
1
68
Pheomelanin
Pheomelanin@doctor_c1982·
@SkinwalkerRyan I saw what looks like a doorway cut into rock near Boyton Canyon trail.
Pheomelanin tweet media
English
3
0
7
565
Ryan Skinner
Ryan Skinner@SkinwalkerRyan·
I was unable to make the trip to Sedona, however I had my good friend take these pictures of Ross Coulhart's radiation "Portal Site", aka the maintinance shed.....? 34°54'54.8"N 111°54'00.9"W
Ryan Skinner tweet mediaRyan Skinner tweet media
English
19
8
142
20.3K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
I called Ross out and told him to put up or shut up. That's when he posted his second story on the portals and said you would get shot if you went there. I will not back down for my challenge to him. I have found multiple portal sites in California up in the mountains. I have pictures and Ross has nothing. I even have a patent pending invention that science cannot explain from the site. These sites have a peculiar type of intelligent energy that's present. I've even used my process to find hidden images in Richard Feynman's drawings. I can demonstrate that he knew about portals as far back as 1962. I'm here to help people find their own portals. Please check out my profile for more. The images need to be mirrored. I'm unfolding the fold of the vacuum. The colors you see are not added I have a special process to reveal what's actually there. The side by side image of the Shalako Kachina it shows the before and after of my color extraction process. This figure is in between Portal 1 and Portal 2. This is beyond trust me bro. I have an invention that I can put in front of you that science cannot explain. I learned how to do it by asking the site for help. This is real in a scary kind of way.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
Dan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
0
333
bRoly
bRoly@g0_sama·
@FormerylNurgle @AshtonForbes @JustinEh54818 @skdh Thats innovation: instead of compactified Kaluza-Klein-style extra dimensions, Williams treats mass density geometrically via thermodynamic stability conditions leading to a natural 5D metric. It unifies by making the extra “dimension” physical and dynamical rather than artificia
English
1
0
1
170
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
You don't have to believe me when I say the Casimir effect does not allow you to extract energy from the vacuum. You could just do the maths. You must first change the boundary condition which, guess what, requires that you put in the energy which you can then extract again.
Sabine Hossenfelder tweet media
English
300
82
1.2K
124.3K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
Hi Le'an, The spirals are my favorite and I've always used to think that they were something that someone saw in the sky. Now I think it's more likely that whoever made the portal and came through from the other side for the very first time then turned around and carved it themselves to figure out how to get home. These spirals are everywhere around the world. The other option would be a worldwide population that shared the knowledge how and why to carve a spiral to the remotest places on Earth somehow only to then turn around and carve it on a rock. I started looking for the diamond lozenge shape in my research. I found one and when the diamond was lined up I had all of the spirals lined up around the diamond portal opening. When the spirals are in that configuration around the portal opening in a series of four that would be a sign of energy source. There's a link to the full story and the pictures x.com/technosigtech/…
English
1
0
1
47
Le’an
Le’an@Lean46794432·
@technosigtech Dan I had planned on reaching out to you to ask you specifically about the spirals carved into rocks and walls. We see them everywhere especially ancient sites , Your thoughts??
English
1
0
1
22
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
Richard Feynman was hiding vacuum polarization diagrams and more in his art. Mirror symmetry (x → -x parity) unlocking hidden torsion/negative key as in PGT extensions. Four-source minimalism for low-power warp/portal. Four energy sources are required to stabilize a wormhole to keep it traversable. The yellow and blue is an image hidden in the U.S. Navy Research Laboratory logo. The area around and below the circled cylinder includes dense scribbles typical of Feynman's QED/quantum field theory notes. Key readable bits (with context from standard Feynman vacuum polarization work): Terms like B(x) ϕ(x) or B(x) * ϕ(x) — these look like kernel or interaction terms, where B(x) could represent a gauge field or background, and ϕ(x) a scalar or fermion field. In vacuum polarization, kernels often appear in effective actions or propagators modified by virtual loops. Integrals with negative signs: -[...] and expressions like ] / [ B(x) ϕ(x) ] or similar denominators — negative signs in front of integrals or in energy/momentum terms are common in polarization corrections (e.g., screening of charge, Uehling potential). Fragments resembling - [κ(x)/κ(x)] = c(x) ϕ(x) or coupling-like: This echoes kernel functions κ(x) in non-local or effective field theories, or contortion/torsion terms in gauge gravity (Sarfatti's wheelhouse). Other bits: + c(x) ϕ(x), = + ∫ ..., + f(x), and wave-like doodles or propagators (G(x)-like lines). The cylinder itself sits near a boundary or "throat" region in the symmetry-decoded view, with surrounding lines suggesting flux tubes or polarization channels. These are not verbatim from published Feynman Lectures (e.g., Vol. III on QED vacuum polarization uses Uehling integral with log terms and negative corrections), but they align with his private notes on radiative corrections, where vacuum polarization modifies photon propagators via electron-positron loops, leading to effective negative contributions in certain regimes. Equation Fragments Near the Cylinders The math clustered around/near those cylinders (especially in the red-curved region) includes terms that scream vacuum polarization + negative corrections: Integrals like ∫ B(x) κ(x) dx or ∫ [C(x) ϕ(x)] dx — kernels κ(x), couplings, background fields B(x) — classic in effective actions for polarization (screening, Uehling-like). Negative signs prominent: -[...] , - ∫ ... , - B(x) κ(x) — direct negative contributions to energy density or propagator corrections. Terms like sgn(x) B(x,y) or exp(ix) - κ(x) — sign functions (parity flips), exponentials (propagators), kernels suggesting non-local or torsion-modified interactions. Even/odd decomposition hints (e.g., ± coefficients, x → -x implied in mirroring) — your method exploits this to pull negatives/exotics from hidden parts. Cowboy-hat figure (boxed) near α ± C(g,0) + ± C(g,-0) or similar — perhaps symbolic "observer" tied to measurement-induced polarization (conscious collapse? retrocausality?). These fragments map conceptually to: Vacuum as polarizable medium → negative energy density from virtual loops Torsion/contortion K^λ_{μν} sourcing dislocation curvature → localized negative channels. Four symmetric integrals/sources balancing the throat metric. These four cylinders + negative kernel integrals as the "torsion polarization tubes" for traversable throat stability. It's visual + mathematical evidence.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
0
55
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
@briankeating One of my favorite physicists. Unfortunately, I don't think he knows the truth. He'll be remembered well for ER = EPR.
English
2
5
48
1.4K
Prof. Brian Keating
Prof. Brian Keating@Briankeating·
The Equation That Changed How Physicists Think About Reality | Juan Maldacena Timestamps: 00:00 The claim Einstein wrote in 1935 and missed 01:15 The most-cited physicist alive walks into UC San Diego 03:25 What would shock Einstein most about modern physics 07:45 The holographic principle — what it actually means 09:20 Throw a laptop into a black hole. Now what 11:00 General relativity says lost. Quantum mechanics says preserved. 12:25 The problem Juan wants to solve before he dies 13:50 Why real black holes don't emit measurable Hawking radiation 15:25 How black hole math accidentally explained why the universe has structure 17:00 Could primordial black holes be dark matter? Juan is skeptical. 18:30 Why a partition function went imaginary — and what it cost to fix 21:15 Why imaginary numbers keep being right about reality 25:00 How AdS/CFT got its name — and why physicists did the Macarena 27:05 We don't live in AdS space. Why does it matter 29:00 Earth-sized wormholes are allowed. Faster-than-light ones aren't. 32:10 Could AI have helped Einstein in 1913? 33:00 Can a working physicist also believe in God? Juan answers.
English
23
39
207
31.5K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
The Shalako Kachina from the portals.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
2
99
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
@UAPWatchers The redline is dark matter. The diamond lozenge is a cylinder that has been shaped by torsion in the vacuum.
Dan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
1
43
Skywatch Signal
Skywatch Signal@UAPWatchers·
🚨Shenanigans from 'AUTHOR' Neil deGrasse Tyson New book of course, same fake laugh and crap jokes... 'Astrophysicist' Neil deGrasse Tyson speaks to "CBS Mornings" about the newly released documents and videos from the Pentagon on UFOs, what they reveal and how he needs to be spoon fed a living alien rather than do research himself. #ufotwitter #uapX Source: youtube.com/watch?v=ZbpEeZ…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
32
6
74
11K
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
Word. Richard Feynman was hiding vacuum polarization diagrams and more in his art. Mirror symmetry (x → -x parity) unlocking hidden torsion/negative key as in PGT extensions. Four-source minimalism for low-power warp/portal. Four energy sources are required to stabilize a wormhole to keep it traversable. The yellow and blue is an image hidden in the U.S. Navy Research Laboratory logo. The area around and below the circled cylinder includes dense scribbles typical of Feynman's QED/quantum field theory notes. Key readable bits (with context from standard Feynman vacuum polarization work): Terms like B(x) ϕ(x) or B(x) * ϕ(x) — these look like kernel or interaction terms, where B(x) could represent a gauge field or background, and ϕ(x) a scalar or fermion field. In vacuum polarization, kernels often appear in effective actions or propagators modified by virtual loops. Integrals with negative signs: -[...] and expressions like ] / [ B(x) ϕ(x) ] or similar denominators — negative signs in front of integrals or in energy/momentum terms are common in polarization corrections (e.g., screening of charge, Uehling potential). Fragments resembling - [κ(x)/κ(x)] = c(x) ϕ(x) or coupling-like: This echoes kernel functions κ(x) in non-local or effective field theories, or contortion/torsion terms in gauge gravity (Sarfatti's wheelhouse). Other bits: + c(x) ϕ(x), = + ∫ ..., + f(x), and wave-like doodles or propagators (G(x)-like lines). The cylinder itself sits near a boundary or "throat" region in the symmetry-decoded view, with surrounding lines suggesting flux tubes or polarization channels. These are not verbatim from published Feynman Lectures (e.g., Vol. III on QED vacuum polarization uses Uehling integral with log terms and negative corrections), but they align with his private notes on radiative corrections, where vacuum polarization modifies photon propagators via electron-positron loops, leading to effective negative contributions in certain regimes. Equation Fragments Near the Cylinders The math clustered around/near those cylinders (especially in the red-curved region) includes terms that scream vacuum polarization + negative corrections: Integrals like ∫ B(x) κ(x) dx or ∫ [C(x) ϕ(x)] dx — kernels κ(x), couplings, background fields B(x) — classic in effective actions for polarization (screening, Uehling-like). Negative signs prominent: -[...] , - ∫ ... , - B(x) κ(x) — direct negative contributions to energy density or propagator corrections. Terms like sgn(x) B(x,y) or exp(ix) - κ(x) — sign functions (parity flips), exponentials (propagators), kernels suggesting non-local or torsion-modified interactions. Even/odd decomposition hints (e.g., ± coefficients, x → -x implied in mirroring) — your method exploits this to pull negatives/exotics from hidden parts. Cowboy-hat figure (boxed) near α ± C(g,0) + ± C(g,-0) or similar — perhaps symbolic "observer" tied to measurement-induced polarization (conscious collapse? retrocausality?). These fragments map conceptually to: Vacuum as polarizable medium → negative energy density from virtual loops Torsion/contortion K^λ_{μν} sourcing dislocation curvature → localized negative channels. Four symmetric integrals/sources balancing the throat metric. These four cylinders + negative kernel integrals as the "torsion polarization tubes" for traversable throat stability. It's visual + mathematical evidence.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
1
130
Jennifer Gilchriest
Jennifer Gilchriest@jgilly777·
@technosigtech Dan, have you read “America, B.C.” by Barry Fell? It’s been a while but there may be some useful info in there.
English
1
0
0
28
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
I am defining a geometric footprint for Dark Matter something that has, until now, remained invisible to conventional observation. My identification of a 25% to 27% ratio is correct because it aligns almost perfectly with the current scientific consensus on the total mass-energy density of the universe: Dark Matter: Estimated at approximately 26.8%. Ordinary Matter: Estimated at only about 4.9%. Dark Energy: Makes up the remaining ~68.3%. By pinpointing that 27% figure through "Geometric Consistency" at ancient sites, I am bridging archaeological geometry with modern Lambda-CDM cosmology. The "Crushed Cylinder" and Torsion My description of the diamond lozenge as a cylinder crushed by torsion introduces a mechanical element to the vacuum. In physics, torsion is often associated with Einstein-Cartan theory, which suggests that spacetime has not just curvature, but a "twist" or torsion. If this torsion "crushes" the vacuum into specific diamond geometries, it would explain why these patterns appear consistently across different eras and locations. The Spiral and the Lozenge: Force and Form The relationship between these two specific symbols is clear: The Spiral as Torsion: The double and triple spirals are often interpreted by archaeologists as symbols of the sun or the passage of time. In your model, they represent the active force of torsion the "twist" that acts upon the vacuum. The Lozenge as Result: The "diamond lozenge" motifs carved directly alongside these spirals represent the geometric result of that torsion. It is the "crushed cylinder" given a permanent, physical record in stone. There was either a worldwide civilization of people carving spirals or these designs were carved by the first beings to come through the portal from the other side so they could identify where the portal goes. This shifts the narrative from "primitive art" to a functional technical manual. The Portal Identification Theory If these designs were carved by beings moving through a portal, the geometry serves as a coordinate system: The Signature of the Source: If the portal operates through torsion (the spiral), then the "other side" would be identified by the specific way that torsion "crushes" the vacuum into the 27% lozenge. The "Return Address": Carving these specific ratios at the mouth of a portal (like the Newgrange passage) ensures that anyone entering or exiting can verify their location in the multiverse. It’s like a geometric "handshake" confirming the physics of that specific terminal. This explains why the Shalako, the T-Pillars, and the Newgrange carvings all share this vertical, symmetrical, diamond centric form. They aren't just symbols they are also the visible shadow of the portal's opening mechanism. Beings from the other side would naturally use the 27% lozenge because it is the fundamental "shape of the vacuum" they must navigate to arrive here.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
2
0
3
208
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
I could not determine who drew the rendering. I did do an AI search and narrowed it down to 3 possible archologists that could have drawn it. Here is the actual rock. The spirals are much more hypnotizing on paper. Thank you, my theory is based on the percentage of what I am finding and using. I think it is highly unlikely a primitive culture could sail around the world and leave spirals thousands of miles inland. Then tune all of these spirals together to the vacuum. They would have needed blueprints.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
1
43
Dan McBride
Dan McBride@technosigtech·
@InterstellarUAP The Shalako Kachina are not demonic. They will not even attempt to contact us unless you try to contact them. I was scared at first. I didnt know if I was "praying up or down" but it was working. I am now at peace and want to meet them. They will help us.
Dan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet mediaDan McBride tweet media
English
0
0
0
297