🦅

@Joe__Bassey This is the Igbo part of Cameroon 🇨🇲

Official Notice to the Finnish Government and the International Community on the Unlawful Detention and Credible Assassination Threat Against H.E. Simon Ekpa The United States of Biafra Government hereby uses this opportunity to formally notify the Finnish Government that it is unjustly detaining the leader of a nation, His Excellency Simon Ekpa, Prime Minister of the United States of Biafra, despite being barred under the principle of estoppel from carrying out such actions. Furthermore, we bring to the attention of the Finnish Government and the international community the existence of a credible threat to assassinate His Excellency Simon Ekpa. In the attached video evidence, a member of the Nigerian regime, Jesutega Onokpasa (now deceased), explicitly stated that he had advocated for H.E. Simon Ekpa to be shot. This alarming revelation raises several critical questions: 1. Who were the individuals present at this meeting? 2. Where was the planned location for the shooting of H.E. Simon Ekpa? 3. If the plan was to carry out the assassination in Nigeria, how did they intend to transfer him there? 4. If the plan was to execute this act in Finland, what means were to be employed? 5. Were any corrupt Finnish officials involved in or aware of this meeting? We hereby call upon principled Finnish authorities to ensure that His Excellency Simon Ekpa is afforded 24-hour security protection immediately upon his unconditional release from his unlawful detention. It is important to note that Jesutega Onokpasa would have been a key witness to be summoned for questioning before the appropriate courts in matters concerning H.E. Simon Ekpa. However, shortly after publicly revealing the assassination plans, he died under mysterious circumstances at the age of 49, with no clear or confirmed cause of death. @FinGovernment @Ulkoministerio @IntlCrimCourt @CIJ_ICJ @ECHR_CEDH @EUCourtPress @CoEHumanRights @EUCouncil @CoE_RuleofLaw @CoESocialRights @court_afchpr @achpr_cadhp @alexstubb @PetteriOrpo @anttihakkanen @MariPSRantanen @leena_meri @kokoomus

"I have never in my life addressed Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as a drug lord..." Daniel Bwala says the media has misquoted most of his remarks on various issues, lamenting the decline of quality journalism. Full 📹: youtu.be/CkdQYskeTTs

ADC Raises Alarm Over INEC Landmines - Plot to Prevent Party From Fielding Candidates We are compelled to raise serious concerns about a developing situation that appears designed to prevent the African Democratic Congress (ADC) from fielding candidates in the upcoming elections. It is based on documentary evidence which we are now placing before the Nigerian public, including certified INEC records, attendance logs, monitoring reports, and excerpts from the Commission’s own sworn affidavit. Taken together, these documents establish a clear and consistent record of events. View the records here: bit.ly/NafiuGombeCase INEC received formal notice of the July 29, 2025 National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting of the ADC. It deployed officials to monitor that meeting. It documented the proceedings and received formal reports from its field officers. Following this, INEC updated its internal records and uploaded the names of the new leadership, including Senator David Mark as National Chairman and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary. These are not claims. They are facts contained in INEC’s own records. In addition, the Commission’s sworn affidavit before the Federal High Court, in its response to Nafiu Bala Gombe on 12 September 2025, particularly in Clauses 14 to 19, affirms key legal principles: that the leadership transition had already been completed and recognized, that such internal party matters fall outside the scope of judicial interference, that completed acts cannot be reversed by injunction, and also recognizes the David Mark-led NWC. Yet, despite this clear documentary trail, INEC has now taken the position that it will no longer receive any correspondence from the ADC pending the determination of a matter before the Federal High Court. This is where the contradiction becomes dangerous. The Electoral Act imposes strict timelines on political parties, including the 21-day notice requirement and submission deadlines. INEC itself has fixed May 10 as the deadline for the submission of relevant documents. However, by refusing to receive communication from the ADC within this same period, the Commission is effectively preventing the Party from complying with the law. In simple terms, INEC is effectively threatening that unless the courts deliver judgment on the ADC leadership issue by May 10, it will prevent the ADC from producing candidates. This places the ADC in an impossible position and creates a clear pathway to artificial non-compliance, which can then be used to justify excluding the Party from fielding candidates. That is the landmine. INEC has claimed that its April 1 decision was taken to avoid rendering the proceedings before the Federal High Court nugatory. The reality is the opposite. By intervening in a matter already before the court and issuing a pronouncement with clear legal and operational consequences, the Commission has itself undermined the very process it claims to protect. What is even more concerning is that this position contradicts INEC’s own prior conduct and legal stance. The same Commission that monitored, documented, recognized, and swore to an affidavit confirming the ADC leadership is now acting in a way that contradicts its earlier position. We therefore call on the Commission to immediately reverse this position, resume the acceptance of all lawful correspondence from the ADC, and uphold its constitutional responsibility to ensure a level playing field for all political parties. We also call on Nigerians to be wary and remain vigilant about these dangerous machinations to subvert Nigeria’s democracy and impose a civilian dictatorship on the country.