Super Galactic Fantastic Dimension

COMING SOON! After ruthless forces destroy his family while searching for mysterious ancient devices, Spike joins a growing resistance driven by revenge. But alongside his robotic companion NOVA, Spike soon discovers that his destiny, is far greater than vengeance. ⚡️ SPIKE & NOVA ⚡️ A futuristic, galactic anime adventure filled with cosmic mystery, ancient power, and explosive action! @capcutapp @gptimage2 #seadance2 @OiiOii_Official ↓Video in chat↓

@taherdhanera Maybe. The key is discipline, focus, and a clear goal. Solo filmmaking is nothing new.

Solo AI filmmaking is a myth. Not because one person cannot generate images, animate shots, clone voices, write scripts, or cut trailers. One person can technically do all of it now. The problem is bandwidth. Film is not a single skill. Film is sustained judgment across hundreds of tiny creative decisions. And AI multiplies options so aggressively that decision fatigue becomes the real villain. You are no longer fighting production limits. You are drowning in infinite possibility. A serious AI film team today needs at least 3 to 4 people.

Yes

Alphatron Adventures Revised Intro youtu.be/vmev6evUi2s?si…

Always striving to get batter. Another version of the intro to Alphatron Adventures, this time I added additional cuts and rearranged others to provide more of a narrative feel. Used @Seadance2; @GPTImage2; @Photoshop, @capcutapp Alphatron Adventures Revised Intro youtu.be/vmev6evUi2s?si… via @YouTube

Awesome!

@lr_mvcreative AD

"Where'd you shoot the mountain?" We didn't. We made a $3M looking campaign for 100x less. The client never knew it was AI. Here's how: Creative director directing AI, not prompting. Storyboards in Midjourney, animated in Kling. Open-source classical to make it read expensive. The thinking that went into a $3M shoot, minus the production. Full stack and storyboard process written up. Comment AD and I'll send it.

@aimikoda @mitte_ai It seems the sweet spot is 3 to 4 panels across.

GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 on @mitte_ai When using storyboards, I try not to describe every shot in the video prompt as much as possible. To support that, I started adding more details into the storyboards instead. The idea is letting the storyboard carry shot order, pacing, camera logic and continuity while keeping the video prompt simpler. Still experimenting with it but results feel promising. You can check the prompts and result.

As a Creator I’ve finally figured out which AI tools SHOULD replace me in the process and which ones shouldn’t. And it’s pretty simple… I create the value and I use AI tools for speed and automation. Clipping videos is not something I do better than AI. Uploading across all of my platforms is not something I do better than AI. Hunting down large pieces of data and organizing them so I can quote one statistic in a video is not something I do better than AI. The thing I do better is be the HUMAN IN THE LOOP, the bridge between the viewer and value. I don’t have to do labor intensive task just to brag that I did them all myself, or that I can command someone’s time to do draining or difficult work list because I can pay them for it. Being human doesn’t mean we stop using tools. We just have to use them to increase the human value we are creating. If it means you show up more, then you’re doing it right.

This was inevitable.

For once I agree with you regarding an AI issue. This is very odd.

@mypalal A garbage story from a garbage newspaper. Figures.

Hey folks. LA has been the safest it’s been in decades. Any crime or mass looting is a figment of your imagination.

What say you?

I don't care anymore... youtu.be/I5UYkB4ijHw?si… via @YouTube

@jwstorytelling Great, I'll shout it out next Saturday.

@thealphatron I'm a little late but I’ve got a prelaunch page up for issue 2 of my fantasy action comic book. Please hit that “Notify me on launch” button & help spread the word kickstarter.com/projects/ubwri…

If you have a Crowdfund going for a comic or animation, please reply here with the link and we'll shout it out on our livestream today at 10:30am PST. Have a Super Galactic Saturday!

These scenarios are nonsense. If they just handed each employee AI that is idiotic, the purpose of AI is to make things more efficient, you do that by leveraging it for certain tasks, maybe those that require some heavy lifting, so you place it in the hands of your most talented/efficient employees not to EVERYONE. This whole story sounds like bull.

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

All facts.