TheLawOfAverages

The Most Oppressed Group In History Is Actually Group IQ Differences Researchers

“several black men forcibly removed Waldrop from police custody, shot Waldrop in the head, and hung him from a tree.” [Waldrop = White] “black and white residents petitioned the governor to pardon the two who were convicted. The governor pardoned the two black defendants”

Boys, 12, 13 and 15, charged as adults in brutal rape of 12-year-old girl in Florida. Miami police say a group of boys took a 12-year-old girl to a community garden in the city's Overtown neighborhood as one of them raped her for 30 minutes. The three suspects - ages 12, 13 and 15 - were initially arrested after the alleged rape that happened on June 18, 2025, but records showed two of them, the 12-year-old and 13-year-old, were booked into the Metro West Detention Center on Thursday to face adult charges Both the 12-year-old, Jusiah Jones, and 13-year-old, Nelson Nunez, appeared in adult court Friday, where a judge ordered them held without bond until their next court appearance. Records showed the 15-year-old, Xavier Tyson, had an arraignment hearing in adult court scheduled for Friday. According to arrest reports, Jones is charged with aggravated battery and false imprisonment, Nunez is charged with sexual battery on a minor by a minor and kidnapping, and Tyson is charged with sexual battery, false imprisonment, and lewd and lascivious conduct with a child.

If lynching was racist, why were Blacks no more likely to be lynched in Mississippi than in Kansas, in the 1890s? Kansas was where Blacks from stricter Jim Crow states (like Mississippi) chose to move a decade earlier. Shouldn't 'more racist' states have had more lynchings?

In contrary to the modern expectation of systemic judicial bias against Blacks in the Deep South during the 1920s-30s: “The rule of law was upheld and equally applied to both black and white plaintiffs.” There was no evidence of racial discrimination in the judicial process.

In 1934, the Federal Housing Administration drew red lines around Chicago's South Side, officially marking it "hazardous" for mortgage lending. The bureaucrats' reasoning? Too many Black families lived there, making it a "risky investment" in their expert opinion. Those same redlined neighborhoods are now wrapped in layers of zoning restrictions that would make a Soviet planner weep with joy. Single-family-only zones, minimum lot sizes, height restrictions, parking requirements - a beautiful web of "planning" that just happens to keep housing scarce and expensive. Modern city councils don't need to mention race anymore; they just invoke "neighborhood character" and "traffic concerns" while blocking apartments near good schools and transit. The red ink has faded, but the exclusion lives on through the magic of municipal regulation. What began as explicit racial gatekeeping has evolved into a sophisticated system of regulatory barriers that accomplishes the same goal with plausible deniability. The government that created the problem now promises to solve it - with more planning, naturally.

In 1934, the Federal Housing Administration drew red lines around Chicago's South Side, officially marking it "hazardous" for mortgage lending. The bureaucrats' reasoning? Too many Black families lived there, making it a "risky investment" in their expert opinion. Those same redlined neighborhoods are now wrapped in layers of zoning restrictions that would make a Soviet planner weep with joy. Single-family-only zones, minimum lot sizes, height restrictions, parking requirements - a beautiful web of "planning" that just happens to keep housing scarce and expensive. Modern city councils don't need to mention race anymore; they just invoke "neighborhood character" and "traffic concerns" while blocking apartments near good schools and transit. The red ink has faded, but the exclusion lives on through the magic of municipal regulation. What began as explicit racial gatekeeping has evolved into a sophisticated system of regulatory barriers that accomplishes the same goal with plausible deniability. The government that created the problem now promises to solve it - with more planning, naturally.

The Negative Income Tax experiment (NIT), an RCT of providing... a negative income tax to floor incomes at the poverty line. Results: less employment, especially among young single men, greatly increased divorce.