
Matt Maruca 🌞
4.3K posts

Matt Maruca 🌞
@thelightdiet
"You are the light of the world. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works." 🔥🧘♂️🔥 Founder @ra_optics 😎 #thelightdiet





@fishdrinkmilk Hey, buddy! Just click the link, you’ll find plenty of metrics there :) And plenty more to come as well, just keep following me and @ra_optics . We have so many metrics coming I am pretty sure we’ll satisfy your metric craving. 💡







@CryptoverseCNFT @thelightdiet Use it for 6 hours a day and it lasts up to 5 years, so less that $1 a month, so maybe 3 pennys a day






Thanks for the detailed reply and spectra—those NIR-heavy profiles in candle mode (high deep red/NIR proportion, Ra 98) look like strong engineering to mimic incandescent warmth while adding LED efficiency. On flicker: You're right that "not visible" ≠ "absent." Incandescents on 60 Hz AC do modulate at 120 Hz due to V² power dependence, but filament thermal inertia limits it to ~6-10% modulation depth (flicker index ~0.04 per IEEE 1789). That's why it's imperceptible for most. Typical LEDs hit 20-100% without good drivers, but premium ones (with capacitors/smoothing) reach <3-8%—lower than incandescents. Your LUMIOS claim of near-zero AC flicker tracks if the driver fully decouples from mains. Fundamentally, no photon-type superiority: incandescents are thermal blackbody (broad, hot, inefficient); LEDs are electroluminescent + phosphors (tunable spectrum, cooler, efficient). Yours adds NIR benefits incandescents have naturally. If metrics match or beat on flicker, CRI, and bio-impact, it's superior tech—not "inferior because LED." Solid work pushing boundaries.




















