probably.No.One

265 posts

probably.No.One

probably.No.One

@theochris18

Person. Software engineer. Researcher

Katılım Temmuz 2021
1.4K Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
probably.No.One
probably.No.One@theochris18·
Fucks are a limited resource in a world of unlimited fuckery
English
0
0
1
181
Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Ph.D.
Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Ph.D.@iScienceLuvr·
working on AI for pathology brings some interesting challenges since pathology images are gigapixel size, absolutely enormous... what is the right approach for modeling the full context of a pathology image in a computationally efficient way? this is very understudied imo
Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Ph.D. tweet media
English
26
11
162
29.9K
probably.No.One retweetledi
BURKOV
BURKOV@burkov·
The fact that the context of LLMs, especially in the agentic setting, is still stored as raw text instead of a continuously updated embedding tensor surprises me. People invent crazy tricks to paraphrase or regex-replace the long context into a shorter text, or to use images to contain the context's text and then OCR these images. A scientific solution must be embedding-based, and the neural network must learn end-to-end to embed the context of any length by learning a gating mechanism that decides what the embedding tensor must absorb and what it should ignore. Text must only be needed in the output because code is text and the user can read text. The model must think and remember in embeddings.
English
36
9
141
12K
probably.No.One retweetledi
Greeks in AI
Greeks in AI@greeksinai·
🇬🇷 Reminder: the Call for Papers for #GreeksInAI 2026 is open! 📍Eugenides Foundation, Athens 📅15–17 July 2026 📝Submission deadline: 15 May 2026 We invite submissions on recent/ongoing/emerging work in AI/ML worldwide. Submit via: openreview.net/group?id=greek…
English
0
5
11
1.7K
probably.No.One retweetledi
Aksel
Aksel@akseljoonas·
Introducing ml-intern, the agent that just automated the post-training team @huggingface It's an open-source implementation of the real research loop that our ML researchers do every day. You give it a prompt, it researches papers, goes through citations, implements ideas in GPU sandboxes, iterates and builds deeply research-backed models for any use case. All built on the Hugging Face ecosystem. It can pull off crazy things: We made it train the best model for scientific reasoning. It went through citations from the official benchmark paper. Found OpenScience and NemoTron-CrossThink, added 7 difficulty-filtered dataset variants from ARC/SciQ/MMLU, and ran 12 SFT runs on Qwen3-1.7B. This pushed the score 10% → 32% on GPQA in under 10h. Claude Code's best: 22.99%. In healthcare settings it inspected available datasets, concluded they were too low quality, and wrote a script to generate 1100 synthetic data points from scratch for emergencies, hedging, multilingual etc. Then upsampled 50x for training. Beat Codex on HealthBench by 60%. For competitive mathematics, it wrote a full GRPO script, launched training with A100 GPUs on hf.co/spaces, watched rewards claim and then collapse, and ran ablations until it succeeded. All fully backed by papers, autonomously. How it works? ml-intern makes full use of the HF ecosystem: - finds papers on arxiv and hf.co/papers, reads them fully, walks citation graphs, pulls datasets referenced in methodology sections and on hf.co/datasets - browses the Hub, reads recent docs, inspects datasets and reformats them before training so it doesn't waste GPU hours on bad data - launches training jobs on HF Jobs if no local GPUs are available, monitors runs, reads its own eval outputs, diagnoses failures, retrains ml-intern deeply embodies how researchers work and think. It knows how data should look like and what good models feel like. Releasing it today as a CLI and a web app you can use from your phone/desktop. CLI: github.com/huggingface/ml… Web + mobile: huggingface.co/spaces/smolage… And the best part? We also provisioned 1k$ GPU resources and Anthropic credits for the quickest among you to use.
English
136
643
4.7K
1.2M
probably.No.One retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Wow, this tweet went very viral! I wanted share a possibly slightly improved version of the tweet in an "idea file". The idea of the idea file is that in this era of LLM agents, there is less of a point/need of sharing the specific code/app, you just share the idea, then the other person's agent customizes & builds it for your specific needs. So here's the idea in a gist format: gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6… You can give this to your agent and it can build you your own LLM wiki and guide you on how to use it etc. It's intentionally kept a little bit abstract/vague because there are so many directions to take this in. And ofc, people can adjust the idea or contribute their own in the Discussion which is cool.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
1.1K
2.8K
26.7K
7M
probably.No.One
probably.No.One@theochris18·
@karpathy @alexcovo_eth How does the directory strucutre look like? I feel it would be interesting to extract a bunch of tags for each file and use them for discovery in flat strucutre
English
0
0
0
49
probably.No.One retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
English
2.9K
7.1K
58.7K
21M
Google Gemma
Google Gemma@googlegemma·
Meet Gemma 4! Purpose-built for advanced reasoning and agentic workflows on the hardware you own, and released under an Apache 2.0 license. We listened to invaluable community feedback in developing these models. Here is what makes Gemma 4 our most capable open models yet: 👇
Google Gemma tweet media
English
166
845
7.2K
624.9K
OpenAgents
OpenAgents@OpenAgentsAI·
@Goat_Gaucho Awesome to hear that! Feel free to share your feedback with us as you test it out—it helps us improve a lot!And if you star our GitHub repo, you’ll get a free OpenAI API key as a little thank-you for your support.
English
1
0
1
279
OpenAgents
OpenAgents@OpenAgentsAI·
Introducing OpenAgents Workspace. One workspace where all your AI agents work together, shared chat, shared files, shared browsers. Connect OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex and more. Watch them collaborate, and work while you sleep. Open source on GitHub. Please give us a star: github.com/openagents-org… #OpenSource #AIAgents #MultiAgent
English
114
128
919
358.6K
probably.No.One retweetledi
Yuval Adam
Yuval Adam@yuvadm·
if you don't have these in your configs you're ngmi
Yuval Adam tweet media
English
14
92
760
492.2K
probably.No.One retweetledi
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
Claude watching me write code manually after I hit the daily limit
English
400
5.9K
80.7K
3.7M
probably.No.One retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Software horror: litellm PyPI supply chain attack. Simple `pip install litellm` was enough to exfiltrate SSH keys, AWS/GCP/Azure creds, Kubernetes configs, git credentials, env vars (all your API keys), shell history, crypto wallets, SSL private keys, CI/CD secrets, database passwords. LiteLLM itself has 97 million downloads per month which is already terrible, but much worse, the contagion spreads to any project that depends on litellm. For example, if you did `pip install dspy` (which depended on litellm>=1.64.0), you'd also be pwnd. Same for any other large project that depended on litellm. Afaict the poisoned version was up for only less than ~1 hour. The attack had a bug which led to its discovery - Callum McMahon was using an MCP plugin inside Cursor that pulled in litellm as a transitive dependency. When litellm 1.82.8 installed, their machine ran out of RAM and crashed. So if the attacker didn't vibe code this attack it could have been undetected for many days or weeks. Supply chain attacks like this are basically the scariest thing imaginable in modern software. Every time you install any depedency you could be pulling in a poisoned package anywhere deep inside its entire depedency tree. This is especially risky with large projects that might have lots and lots of dependencies. The credentials that do get stolen in each attack can then be used to take over more accounts and compromise more packages. Classical software engineering would have you believe that dependencies are good (we're building pyramids from bricks), but imo this has to be re-evaluated, and it's why I've been so growingly averse to them, preferring to use LLMs to "yoink" functionality when it's simple enough and possible.
Daniel Hnyk@hnykda

LiteLLM HAS BEEN COMPROMISED, DO NOT UPDATE. We just discovered that LiteLLM pypi release 1.82.8. It has been compromised, it contains litellm_init.pth with base64 encoded instructions to send all the credentials it can find to remote server + self-replicate. link below

English
1.4K
5.4K
28K
66.5M
probably.No.One
probably.No.One@theochris18·
3/n And I'm still talking about og programming. In vibe-coding, the potential reward is even bigger. And the effort feels miniscule. You are always one prompt away from "overnight success". This can be addictive Fill you with anxiety Make you bet everything And you rarely win
English
0
0
0
17
probably.No.One
probably.No.One@theochris18·
2/n A small change can have a huge impact. Small effort, big potential return. Yeah, that may feel like gambling. Even when you know what you're doing.Cause it may or may not work. You either win, or have to try again by "depositing" more time and energy. This could be addictive
English
1
0
0
8
probably.No.One
probably.No.One@theochris18·
Hey @ThePrimeagen, thanks for this video. youtu.be/ZJEnQOsMtsU?is… Here's my two cents 1/n I believe there is a pov where programming may be considered addictive in some sense. Specifically, debugging. Where one letter, one symbol, one minor change, could make everything work.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
0
0
17