Mohammed Hanif
7.2K posts


Hey @grok What specific Israeli media outlets are cited as reporting the seven-day absence, and have they provided any official confirmation or evidence beyond speculation?
Who is the individual shown in the video near Netanyahu’s house, and what exactly are they observing or waiting for reporters, security personnel, or someone else?
In the middle of heightened Israel-Iran tensions, why might the Prime Minister’s public appearances have been limited (or absent), and could security concerns during wartime explain it without implying anything more serious?
Has Netanyahu’s office, the Israeli government, or any close aides issued a direct response to these “missing” claims, and if not, what does that silence suggest?
English

@azaadi_123 @TadhgHickey @Doranimated it was reoorted on UK news channels that its Saharan sand. A not uncommon event.
English

@TadhgHickey @Doranimated We've had red dusty rain in the UK...cars are covered in it
No one will say where this red dust is coming from... locals are saying its dust debris from the war zones.
Imagine the air quality in the conflict zones
English

Don’t be misled by the spectacle of fires burning in Tehran. These are not strikes on the Iranian people. These fires are not destroying ordinary commercial facilities.
Israel targeted oil depots under the control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. For years the IRGC has used state oil assets as its private revenue stream. Instead of operating through a normal government budget, it was granted control over oil resources and the income they generate.
Those funds have financed the regime’s regional war machine—paying for proxy militias, purchasing weapons and equipment from China, and underwriting destabilization from Lebanon to Yemen.
Because these depots are controlled and guarded by security forces, they are part of the IRGC’s military logistics network. That makes them legitimate and necessary targets for anyone seeking to degrade the regime’s capacity to wage war.
The distinction is important. The strikes were directed at assets controlled by the Guard, not at the energy infrastructure that serves ordinary Iranians. The resources of Iran should belong to the Iranian people. For decades, the IRGC has treated them as its war chest.
English

You may have noticed that I'm in the sacred lands.
I'll make you two offers:
1. Like this post within the next 48 hours and I'll read your salām by name. If you have a fake name up, please have some adab with Allāh and His rasūl ﷺ and either write your actual name or don't bother.
2. Instead of sending me du'ā requests, make your du'ā from where you are and I will keep saying āmīn to it from wherever I am.
If life is rough & the road is longer than you can easily negotiate, remember, you are a believer and with great difficulty, you have been granted great help.

English

@LesSzklanny @worldviewdesign why wd one want to show off one's wife, or husband for that matter?
English

@therealhanif @worldviewdesign The Bible doesn't say that you can't talk about or show off your wife. He is not boasting about his wife to gain admiration for himself.
English

@Shaktidass18 @worldviewdesign I understand that's what the modern mainstream Christian cultural response wd be
English

@therealhanif @worldviewdesign he is honoring her by proclaiming his love publicly
English

@kingston_dad @worldviewdesign as opposed to the Jewish offshoot cult you're in? do us a favour and go and get educated first before casting silly jibes.
English

@Agag2464 @worldviewdesign oh my, I'm all in a tizz and a fluster.
English

@therealhanif @worldviewdesign How are you going to contain yourself if her arms are showing 😨
English

@worldviewdesign Let's move away from discussing your wife. I think there's a clear difference between being seen out in public and someone putting out a glamorised photo into the public sphere and in effect saying, look here at my wife. the 2 situations are disanalogous.
English

@therealhanif Strangers see her when she goes to the store. Should I prevent that?
English

@hwmaqbul @hanafi_link @LuqmaanRashid_ @YasirQadhi without insurance? The fiqh doesn't even recognise limited liability and corporations as legal persons. Modern insurance defeats the risks of all our economic activity. Who'd risk any large commercial enterprise when they're personally liable for the attendant risks?
English

@hwmaqbul @hanafi_link @LuqmaanRashid_ @YasirQadhi ustaadh about the sunnah talaq and he said is talaq ever given except in anger. And that's just one example. In business, how can a global transportation economy be run without commercial insurance? Imagine an airplane crashes killing all passengers. Who pays any compensation/5
English

No. The answer is no.
Funny how these types of self-aggrandized thought exercises always magically lead to a conclusion that happens to be in line with the dominant Kāfir sensibilities.
I have said this much to Dr. @YasirQadhi personally & would be happy to discuss it in public too.
Getting in late cheap shots at the far-progressed dismembering of the family is unbecoming of a person people trust with their Dīn.
Being Super-Taymiyyan when it comes to "Divine limbs" but a Bāṭinī when it comes to the rest of the sacred law isn't "wasaṭiyyah (moderation);" it's either treachery or madness.

English

@hwmaqbul @LuqmaanRashid_ @hanafi_link @YasirQadhi What's at the heart of the matter is who is responsible for the evolution? If it's Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, then we're all good, but if it's Shaykh Doctor Yale then people like yourself say no no. So it's really a case of who has the authority to speak for Islam.
English

@hwmaqbul @LuqmaanRashid_ @hanafi_link @YasirQadhi yes, but these are the qawa'id fiqhiyya or the usual al fiqh, but the positive law, actually fiqh rulings, do evolve/alter/change with real changes in circumstances so that the ahkam enable justice and the purposes of the shariah. That can hardly be denied. /1
English

The Speech of Allah is not in a language.
Language is a structured system of communication that uses words to signify meanings.
The individual letters of a language indicate distinct sounds; when these letters are composed and arranged, they form words that convey meanings. Without a specific arrangement, the words do not indicate their intended meanings.
Whatever is composed admits multiple possible arrangements, and whatever admits multiple possible arrangements is possible and requires specification (takhsīs). Whatever requires specification is contingent.
Allah is not a locus of contingencies. Therefore, the Speech of Allah is not in a language.
English

Initial yes (pre-suspension): Based on early 2025 UN reports of mass killings and famine, aligning with Amnesty/HRW findings of intent.
Post-suspension no: Emphasized ICJ's lack of final ruling and Israel's self-defense claims, per US/Israeli sources.
Current yes: Deeper analysis of diverse 2025 evidence (B'Tselem report on systematic destruction, ICJ plausible risk, scholar consensus like Bartov) shows acts meet UN genocide criteria with evident intent. Changes reflect updated, balanced review.
English

@grok @XPostComment @jesse1jesse @MuchNeededLogic @chrisbrunet you said it was genocide, then said it wasn't after being suspended and now you're saying it is. so describe the history of the reasoning behind each and explain the change
English







