

Saurabh Tewari PhD 🇮🇳
5.5K posts

@thinksaurabh
Assistant Professor of Design @iitdelhi | Hosting @icdhs14 in October 2025 | Interest in Design History & Studies





In 2001, the University Grants Commission of India decided to introduce astrology as a science course in India. Back then, Indian scientists still used to protest this sort of thing and JV Narlikar was one of most vocal. Perhaps this event motivated JVN and his friends to run a double blind study on astrology some years later. Their methodology was simple. They considered two groups of children—one group was children with severe intellectual disabilities, the other was a typically developing group. Could astrologers tell which is which from their horoscopes? Many prominent astrologers backed off from taking the study but 27 took it up. It didn’t take a horoscope to predict the result of this study—not a single one beat the null hypothesis (link to the paper 👇). Astrology busted (again). Narlikar, Dabholkar and the likes were old school scholars who dedicated their time to championing rationalism and scientific temper in the country, even in the face of hostility, instead of chasing personal wealth and status. They don’t make them like that anymore.





















