Widge

153.5K posts

Widge banner
Widge

Widge

@thirdgenwidget

Be free.

Katılım Ağustos 2012
46 Takip Edilen847 Takipçiler
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
@jimiuorio It's a meat paste made from some guy named Frank who crossed the wrong people.
English
0
0
1
43
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
A foreign country takes up an extremely disproportionate amount US resources and prioritization... and people are shocked and or dismayed that there is a growing backlash against it? Get real. We are Americans. We live under 1 flag. We have only 1 national loyalty.
English
0
0
0
4
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
@biancoresearch Around here, we tend to look at it as a natural resource hog, eyesore, and a displacement mechanism.
English
0
0
0
62
Jim Bianco
Jim Bianco@biancoresearch·
The fear over AI is palpable. So, it's time for my optimistic take .... Why the AI doom-and-gloom story is missing the bigger picture A lot of people hear “AI” and immediately think one of two things: it’s just Google search on steroids, or it’s a magic machine coming for everyone’s job. Both miss the bigger picture. A job is not one single task; it’s a bundle of tasks supported by a massive, fragmented software stack. Email, spreadsheets, presentations, Slack, CRM platforms, and, in finance, a Bloomberg Terminal, FactSet, and market data feeds. For millions of jobs, the cost of software to provide basic tools for these tasks can run to $1,000 a month, and more for complicated roles. Much of the modern workday is consumed by the friction of this stack: moving data between systems, cleaning spreadsheets, searching for files, and summarizing meetings. AI is emerging as the new interface for enterprise software. Think about the iPhone. It collapsed cameras, GPS devices, and music players into one simple, powerful device. AI is doing something similar for workplace software, turning 10 clunky programs that don't talk to each other into a single conversational prompt. Just as we stopped buying standalone cameras and tape recorders once the smartphone came around, companies will happily pay for an AI layer. It will be far cheaper and eliminate the bloated costs of that fragmented software stack that requires you to perform endless, mundane tasks because these programs do not talk to each other. The immediate fear is that if AI lets three people do the work of five, companies will fire two people. But that ignores economic history. When the electronic spreadsheet was invented, the cost of calculations plummeted. But accounting jobs didn't vanish; demand for complex financial modeling exploded. Accounting clerks became financial analysts, a more in-demand role. Jevons Paradox suggests that making a resource more efficient actually increases total demand for it. By absorbing the drudgery, AI allows the employee to focus on judgment and strategy—making the human element more valuable, not less. In this framework, demand for high-output workers doesn't shrink; it explodes. Does this justify the mind-numbing capital expenditure currently pouring into AI infrastructure? If AI fulfills this promise of enterprise-wide productivity, the investment isn't just justified—it’s a bargain. That said, we are clearly near the peak of a hype cycle, just like the internet was in 1999. But remember: the dot-com crash did not mean the internet was a bust. It simply meant the hype outpaced the infrastructure. After the wreckage cleared, the optimistic predictions about connectivity and productivity were not only fulfilled—they were exceeded. The same path can lie ahead for AI. And instead of the fear that AI will replace workers, it's the joy of replacing soulless busywork, making jobs more fulfilling... and more profitable for employers.
The Economist@TheEconomist

The jobs apocalypse is not yet here. But if governments wait for conclusive evidence before creating a safety-net, it will be too late. Register for free to understand why econ.st/3PHF3N8

English
53
27
205
55.2K
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
@BrianBrenberg I learned about Mark McGwire at the baseball card shop that I was going to in 1987... "7th Inning Stretch". They gave me a $2 credit for each 87 Topps version that I brought in to trade. That's when I understood and I started looking at baseball cards as a means.
English
0
0
2
74
Brian Brenberg
Brian Brenberg@BrianBrenberg·
Stumbled upon a fun flea market today. Lady was selling these for a buck a piece. She was surprised I wanted two. I told her I couldn’t pass on a double helping of the centerpiece of my 8 year old retirement portfolio.
Brian Brenberg tweet media
English
17
7
134
2.2K
Widge retweetledi
Financelot
Financelot@FinanceLancelot·
If you're curious why the yield curve is freaking out, Kevin Warsh's term begins tonight. He's more concerned about stable prices than full employment. "The story I hear is inflation is not the central bank's fault, it's Putin & the pandemic. Nonsense"
Financelot@FinanceLancelot

The U.S. 30 year and 2 year yield have both broken out. This is the nightmare scenario we saw in 1968 and 1974 where the economy entered a recession, the market turn downward while yields doubled. Not a good way for Kevin Warsh to begin his Federal Reserve term.

English
90
203
1.6K
282K
Agent007
Agent007@Agent0088156721·
@RudyHavenstein It's been a nonstop Jay lovefest for these CNBC bros. It's embarrassing. Jay is Forever known going forward as Special K for his work dividing the economy and the American people.
English
3
1
7
1.3K
Widge retweetledi
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator.
I do this from time to time. Lately people have been sweating… Since January 1962, the average 10-year-yield is 5.82%. The median yield is 5.44%. Today (May 15, 2026) 4.6%. Yes, we have far more debt now. Gee, how did that happen? #WGS10YR
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator. tweet media
English
8
8
35
3K
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
Go figure.
Robby Soave@robbysoave

I have taken a close look at the "hush money" accusation against Rep. Thomas Massie, circulated by @LauraLoomer and others. Quite simply, there is nothing to it. There was no such payment and nothing to "hush" up. An ex-girlfriend had an employment dispute with a separate member of Congress. Her grievance is highly dubious, and anyway it has nothing to do with Massie. His enemies are peddling a vague insinuation in order to discredit him. You are welcome to disagree with Massie. I have had my own disagreements with him on the fallout from the Epstein Files. (Although otherwise I agree with him on probably 90% of issues.) But we should all be able to recognize a pathologically bad-faith political hit job. reason.com/2026/05/15/tho…

English
0
0
0
29
Widge
Widge@thirdgenwidget·
@DavidBCollum Aside from the dependency on state funded payouts and calling that "capitalism"... and the complete dismissal of the concerns of the residents... and the continued proclamation of "2,000 jobs!" (which not a huge amount) ... I don't know what you're referring to.
English
0
0
0
162
Zr1Trader
Zr1Trader@ZR1Trader·
Gas is 4.60 now here. Trump sucking Israel's cock is going to give midterms to Democrats and now we'll be back to square one.
English
3
0
7
220