Reviewer Number 3

This paper is more appropriate for a speciality journal. Like, one that specializes in terrible papers.

body dysmorphia but for the body of my paper

it’s not impostor syndrome your work is actually bad

submitting your paper to nature, only to have it desk rejected immediately twitter.com/JebraFaushay/s…

it me

also your paper was terrible

the personal insults i hurled at you in my review were actually “official actions” taken as a reviewer and so you are not allowed to complain about them, sorry i don’t make the rules here

each @hubermanlab paper has only a 20% chance of being accepted by me, but he submits them 6 times so I have no choice by the end

Does tweeting increase citations? We conducted an experiment with 110 tweeted papers and 440 controls, waited 3 years for citations to accumulate... and found no significant increase in citations journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…

your paper after incorporating my feedback

the review process

when you realize it’s me reviewing your paper twitter.com/HumansNoContex…

When the editor does nothing as I trash your paper

when Reviewer 1’s comments are just as fierce as mine

h/t @aemonten

me, the reviewer of your paper

using this in my next review

your paper after the revisions I requested

revise and resubmit #speakervote

turning the review process into a discussion of my completely irrelevant work (world cup edition)