this tweet

54 posts

this tweet

this tweet

@thistweeth

Katılım Haziran 2025
10 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@jingermini @LowerBackPain04 @megh_wright Tbf we don’t know which part she was referring to, cuz he made a racist joke AFTER he already singled her out and bullied her and said a bunch of arabs are gonna r*pe her.
English
3
0
7
664
jijiung 🍉
jijiung 🍉@jingermini·
@LowerBackPain04 @megh_wright she said at the end of one of the videos when the show was over that he needed to find another job and her friend said he was making racist jokes so it seems they were upset but the crazy part is you couldn’t tell during the show other than the fact she wasn’t laughing 💀
English
1
0
70
4.7K
Megh Wright
Megh Wright@megh_wright·
if you know her or you are her please reach out to me I want to meet her so bad
Megh Wright tweet media
English
226
1.6K
90.9K
1.4M
Vadim | YouTube Thumbnail Strategist
Vadim | YouTube Thumbnail Strategist@VadimThumbnails·
I don’t think you’ve ever made a more complex thumbnail than this one. If you have — drop it in the comments.
Vadim | YouTube Thumbnail Strategist tweet media
English
16
1
47
2.1K
Tryahd
Tryahd@tryahdd·
What really happened to this guy?
Tryahd tweet media
English
28
5
179
19.3K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@T0kenPrince @tryahdd He was never monetised in the first place. He choose not to so that people don’t accuse him of just doing it for the money
English
0
0
0
144
Mostafa Hasan | Thumbnail Designer
Mostafa Hasan | Thumbnail Designer@MostafaVisuals·
If your thumbnail strategy is "copy outlier thumbnails", your views will completely depend on trends. If the trend changes, the video tanks. However, if your inspiration is from OUTSIDE Youtube and you create genuine curiosity, you'll get views forever. Here's one of my own thumbnails to prove this:
Mostafa Hasan | Thumbnail Designer tweet media
English
8
0
42
2.5K
Mr Calm
Mr Calm@dreal_prosper·
@divinelockedin What kind of long form niche would let you post everyday?
English
2
0
2
822
Divine | YouTube
Divine | YouTube@divinelockedin·
YouTube LongForm Will Be Faster For You To Monetize If You Pick A NICHE That Lets You Post Everyday.
English
8
11
192
7.9K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@wannercashcow That’s 6% of the entirety of youtube channels, including the ones that aren’t even active. 😳 Let that sink in!
English
0
0
1
108
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@Richard_YTS If YouTube isn’t even recommending your old videos anywhere, swapping won’t help.
English
0
0
0
117
Richard the Youtube strategist
Richard the Youtube strategist@Richard_YTS·
The worst mistake I made early in YouTube wasn’t my editing, my scripts, or my gear. It was this: Picking one thumbnail and sticking with it. Today, I make a minimum of 9 thumbnails per video. And it’s the reason my “dead” videos still have a chance to take off. Here’s the simple system: 1. Create 3 completely different thumbnail concepts. Not small tweaks, different framing, emotion, story. 2. Make 3 variations of each concept. Color shifts, text changes, layout adjustments, micro-expressions. Now you have 9 options, and more importantly, the ability to test. When a video flatlines, you don’t need to remake the whole thing. You remake the title and thumbnail. That single change gives YouTube another shot at recommending your video. I’ve watched videos go from “dead” to explosive within days, all because of a swap that took seconds. Creators don’t need more content. They need more iterations. Follow for more creator growth insights :)
English
9
9
125
7.7K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@PaddyG96 Is that why an enormous number of channels have significantly dropped in views recently?
English
0
0
0
38
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@MarioJoos You are talking about shorts only. But what I noticed is that the long form content doesn’t get as much views as it used to either. And this applies to a variety of channels. Which is still a mystery. If every channel fell off in terms of views, where are all the viewers going?!
English
0
0
0
38
Mario Joos
Mario Joos@MarioJoos·
🚨Important thread: The YouTube algorithm actually changed, for the worse. (+Data) I’ve been thinking a lot about whether I should or shouldn’t address this publicly. I’ve already talked to some people within YouTube, but I don’t believe the word of a single person, meaning me, will be enough to encourage change. At least not quick change. Before I begin, a direct note to all my friends at YouTube, I truly respect what you’ve been doing in the past year, and I know you’ll take this problem seriously, but I’m also aware that you’ll often have your hands tied and there isn’t much you can personally do. I won’t reveal any sensitive information that people can’t find out by themselves. Let’s begin. A few months ago, creators of all sizes started noticing a significant change in the overall performance of their channels. Usually this is related to the overall behavior of audiences, however, this one felt different. It wasn’t just one or two channels, it was every single channel I was working on (and more). These are channels that pull 100 million to 1 billion views per month at times. At first, I was like: alright, let’s find out where we’re going wrong. Maybe we’re missing something. However, after weeks and months, no answers were found. This is very frustrating, not only for myself but also for the creators who are relying on these answers to maintain their channel, business and livelihood. But that’s when we made a breakthrough, a way of looking at data that we had missed. You see, this entire time we were analyzing the channel as a whole, new and old videos combined. However, we weren’t focused on isolating older content, specifically content with a publish date older than one month. That’s where, for the first time, we noticed something unusual. We saw a complete crash in short form views on content older than one month. (see image) What we found was that somewhere in the middle of September, YouTube had pushed a significant change in their short form algorithm which impacted nearly every short form creator across the platform. Why is this a problem? Because it affects every creator we all care about. It didn’t matter if you were a smaller creator or one of the top ten creators, we haven’t found many people who were spared. I’ll leave a brief explanation at the bottom so you can check your own channel. And these weren’t just entertainment or educational creators, it was both. What we found is that YouTube seems to have implemented a change that strongly prioritizes content uploaded in the last month, roughly 28 to 30 days, we’re still unsure. But what impact does this have, and why do I believe this is something that should be brought to light? The first impact is that we’re seeing a shift away from quality to quantity. Often, creators live off the revenue generated, not just Adsense, from these bigger content pieces. A strong portion of this revenue comes from their back catalog, meaning older content. With this change, you’re increasing the importance of high volume uploads in the first 30 days. What do I believe is happening, and why is this change going through? I believe there are two reasons why YouTube is pushing this change. First, to hit certain targets with Shorts. Plain simple, I don’t believe this is a “what’s best for the creator” type of play, it feels more like a “we want to compete with TikTok” type of play. Not unreasonable, even if the creator gets hurt by it short term. I’m just trying to think from a corporate point of view. The second reason, which I believe to be the actual leading reason, is a push for recency, freshness or novelty, whichever term they would choose to use. But if this is the reason, there’s a massive overcorrection happening. Some content needs that freshness: news, streaming highlights, medical information. However, this isn’t true for all types of content. Some content from years ago is just as good today. We have noticed that certain top content pieces, individual videos, still get a significant amount of views, so it looks more like prioritization than anything else. Regardless, while in private I find it fun to refer to this situation as “the flattening”, in reality this is a very concerning moment where simple ideas turn into a massive hit toward the creator economy. And this is just the tip of the iceberg of changes that have been affecting people. It’s important that changes on the platform aren’t just focused on the consumer, but the preservation of a healthy creator economy that allows creators to grow their business, teams, and create better content. Without a focus on both the creator and the consumer, you’ll quickly run into an issue of low quality slop that makes people want to go elsewhere. If there’s any call to action here for you, whether you’re a creator or a viewer, I strongly encourage you to leave your thoughts here to encourage YouTube to rethink this decision, or at least optimize it so that it’s also regarding the importance of keeping a healthy creator economy. Share your thoughts, and even data from your own channel, because this will be seen by people who have the power to make change. Disclaimer: I’ve left out some sensitive information. However, if you want to check this for yourself, go to Analytics, click on Advanced Mode, filter by Content Type (Shorts), filter by Publish Date (for example any short published from Jan 2025 to Jun 2025), set the data to Last 365 Days and take a look at the change happening around September. I think you can imagine why it took so long for us to find out where the issue began. Thanks for reading this post.
Mario Joos tweet media
English
194
214
1.6K
364.7K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@Grummz He’s talking about shorts only. But what I noticed is that the long form content doesn’t get as much views as it used to either. And this applies to a variety of channels. Which is still a mystery. If every channel fell off in terms of views, where are all the viewers going?!
English
0
0
0
17
Grummz
Grummz@Grummz·
Retention Director for Mr. Beast and others blows the lid on why YouTube views are dropping off for everyone. Short answer. They are trying to be TikTok, only recent views count. Older content getting memory holed in algorithm.
Mario Joos@MarioJoos

🚨Important thread: The YouTube algorithm actually changed, for the worse. (+Data) I’ve been thinking a lot about whether I should or shouldn’t address this publicly. I’ve already talked to some people within YouTube, but I don’t believe the word of a single person, meaning me, will be enough to encourage change. At least not quick change. Before I begin, a direct note to all my friends at YouTube, I truly respect what you’ve been doing in the past year, and I know you’ll take this problem seriously, but I’m also aware that you’ll often have your hands tied and there isn’t much you can personally do. I won’t reveal any sensitive information that people can’t find out by themselves. Let’s begin. A few months ago, creators of all sizes started noticing a significant change in the overall performance of their channels. Usually this is related to the overall behavior of audiences, however, this one felt different. It wasn’t just one or two channels, it was every single channel I was working on (and more). These are channels that pull 100 million to 1 billion views per month at times. At first, I was like: alright, let’s find out where we’re going wrong. Maybe we’re missing something. However, after weeks and months, no answers were found. This is very frustrating, not only for myself but also for the creators who are relying on these answers to maintain their channel, business and livelihood. But that’s when we made a breakthrough, a way of looking at data that we had missed. You see, this entire time we were analyzing the channel as a whole, new and old videos combined. However, we weren’t focused on isolating older content, specifically content with a publish date older than one month. That’s where, for the first time, we noticed something unusual. We saw a complete crash in short form views on content older than one month. (see image) What we found was that somewhere in the middle of September, YouTube had pushed a significant change in their short form algorithm which impacted nearly every short form creator across the platform. Why is this a problem? Because it affects every creator we all care about. It didn’t matter if you were a smaller creator or one of the top ten creators, we haven’t found many people who were spared. I’ll leave a brief explanation at the bottom so you can check your own channel. And these weren’t just entertainment or educational creators, it was both. What we found is that YouTube seems to have implemented a change that strongly prioritizes content uploaded in the last month, roughly 28 to 30 days, we’re still unsure. But what impact does this have, and why do I believe this is something that should be brought to light? The first impact is that we’re seeing a shift away from quality to quantity. Often, creators live off the revenue generated, not just Adsense, from these bigger content pieces. A strong portion of this revenue comes from their back catalog, meaning older content. With this change, you’re increasing the importance of high volume uploads in the first 30 days. What do I believe is happening, and why is this change going through? I believe there are two reasons why YouTube is pushing this change. First, to hit certain targets with Shorts. Plain simple, I don’t believe this is a “what’s best for the creator” type of play, it feels more like a “we want to compete with TikTok” type of play. Not unreasonable, even if the creator gets hurt by it short term. I’m just trying to think from a corporate point of view. The second reason, which I believe to be the actual leading reason, is a push for recency, freshness or novelty, whichever term they would choose to use. But if this is the reason, there’s a massive overcorrection happening. Some content needs that freshness: news, streaming highlights, medical information. However, this isn’t true for all types of content. Some content from years ago is just as good today. We have noticed that certain top content pieces, individual videos, still get a significant amount of views, so it looks more like prioritization than anything else. Regardless, while in private I find it fun to refer to this situation as “the flattening”, in reality this is a very concerning moment where simple ideas turn into a massive hit toward the creator economy. And this is just the tip of the iceberg of changes that have been affecting people. It’s important that changes on the platform aren’t just focused on the consumer, but the preservation of a healthy creator economy that allows creators to grow their business, teams, and create better content. Without a focus on both the creator and the consumer, you’ll quickly run into an issue of low quality slop that makes people want to go elsewhere. If there’s any call to action here for you, whether you’re a creator or a viewer, I strongly encourage you to leave your thoughts here to encourage YouTube to rethink this decision, or at least optimize it so that it’s also regarding the importance of keeping a healthy creator economy. Share your thoughts, and even data from your own channel, because this will be seen by people who have the power to make change. Disclaimer: I’ve left out some sensitive information. However, if you want to check this for yourself, go to Analytics, click on Advanced Mode, filter by Content Type (Shorts), filter by Publish Date (for example any short published from Jan 2025 to Jun 2025), set the data to Last 365 Days and take a look at the change happening around September. I think you can imagine why it took so long for us to find out where the issue began. Thanks for reading this post.

English
81
200
2K
152.9K
Aaboom16🇸🇴
Aaboom16🇸🇴@aaboom16·
The reason why Trump is losing it is coz he found out the founding fathers were all Somali
Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸@jimstewartson

As a student of Trump’s rhetoric, this is by far the most overtly racist, dehumanizing diatribe I’ve heard from him. This is a long way from “very fine people.” This is openly eliminationist, neo-Nazi hate speech against a group because of their race. Then the applause… “But I think that Walz is a grossly incompetent man. There's something wrong with him. There's something wrong with him. And when you look at what he's done with Somalia which is barely a country, you know, they have no anything. They just run around killing each other. There's no structure. And when I see somebody like Ilhan Omar who I don't know at all, but I always watch a few years have watched a complaint about our constitution. Now she's being treated badly, a constitution in the United States of America's a bad place. He hates everybody, hates Jewish people, hates everybody. And I think she's an incompetent person. She's a real terrible person. But when I watch one is happening in Minnesota, the land of a thousand lakes or however many lakes they have, and they got a lot of lakes. But there's beautiful place. And I see these people ripping it off. And now I'm understanding, and you're going to look at, that's a here they ripped off. Somadians ripped off that state for billions of dollars, billions, every year, billions of dollars, and they contribute nothing. The welfare is like 88%. They contribute nothing. I don't want them in our country, I'll be honest with you. Somebody said, oh, that's not politically correct. I don't care. I don't want them in our country. Their country is no good for a reason. Their country stinks, and we don't want them in our country. I can say that about other countries too. I can say that about other countries too. We don't want them to help. We got to, we have to rebuild our country. You know, our country is at a tipping point. We can go bad. We're at a tipping point. I don't know if people mind me saying that, but I'm saying it, we could go one way or the other. And we're going to go the wrong way. We keep taking in garbage into our country. Elon Omar is garbage. She's garbage. Her friends are garbage. These are people that work. These are people that say, let's go, come on, let's make this place great. These are people that do nothing but complain. They complain. And from where they came from, they got nothing. You know, they came from paradise. And they said, this isn't paradise. But when they come from hell and they complain and do nothing, but bitch, we don't want them in our country. Let them go back to where they came from and fix it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.“

English
402
1.3K
16.5K
1.8M
Simon Faceless
Simon Faceless@simonfaceless·
This creator basically RETIRED off ONE upload. The power of YouTube. This Mozart compilation still makes ~$100/day PASSIVELY (and will for life) A full-time US income… from ONE video. Classical music is LEGALLY copyright-free. Bookmark How much you think this video made? 👇
Simon Faceless tweet media
English
11
10
144
14.2K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@ThatBigGAFan20x @grundstromleo Buy a new laptop, new phone, new wifi, new email to create the new channel. If the AI detects that it’s still you, you will get banned again.
English
1
0
0
29
Megan ⭐️
Megan ⭐️@ThatBigGAFan20x·
@grundstromleo All my 12 channels have been terminated too, even my old ones that has no videos. As soon as I logged in after being logged out for so many years… that was it 😢 now I’m scared of putting it effort in a new channel just in case it gets deleted again
English
1
0
2
712
Leo Grundström
Leo Grundström@grundstromleo·
something has happened behind the scenes at the YouTube HQ, someone is pressuring them to do all of this they performed planned terminations for months now, howtoai being one of the first victims I don’t think it is due to AI moderation at all, but very intentional sad to see other people experiencing this as well I guess I’ll add you to the list of a bagillion more educational creators that have to put up with this still waiting for a deep investigation into this @TeamYouTube
Dave Nick@iamdavenick

Wow... I lost 1,000,000 subscribers. And all my childhood videos. AI moderation is out of control @YouTube Their AI bot claims I violated "dangerous content policy" by claiming "guaranteed returns" or promoting a pyramid scheme. I've never done any of that and can prove endlessly. All I did was document trying and testing online businesses since 13 years old. - I have never promoted scams. - I have never put my community at danger. - I have never violated terms intentionally, and when AI flagged my content, I corrected immediately. If sharing business experience and lessons was so 'dangerous', then why did over 1,000,000 subscribe? Why did over 400K people return every month to watch AGAIN? I was getting thousands of messages a week from people who found my free content useful. Knowing I've done nothing wrong, I just thought I'll appeal, they'll see AI made a mistake, and my life's work will be given back to me. I appealed multiple times, and every time I did, I just got a generic response that they won't return my channel. We had 14 full time employees who depended on this channel to feed their families. So YouTube's AI response not only affects me, but affects our team, and millions of people whose lives were positively impacted by this channel. I have been in this space since 2011, and it's heartbreaking to witness AI police bully the whole @YouTubeCreators community. Over a decade of sweat and tears gone in an instant. And I am not the only one that got unfairly removed. Incompetence of AI moderation has financially and emotionally damaged millions of creators. I'm not making this post to beg for sympathy, but as a warning to all creators. If AI can do this to me with over a decade of content and a community of 1,000,000+ people... Then no one is safe anymore. So what can you do? 1) Own your audience. Use YouTube to get discovered, and funnel that audience to a community, group, or email list outside. 2) Retweet this. If we spread awareness far enough, more people will learn about AI police brutality on YouTube. 3) If you’ve had a similar experience, reply. I’m collecting stories. 4) Keep serving your community. Got wrongfully removed? Okay, it's not fair, but you have to keep going. Your audience went to you for a reason. They trust you and you should never let them down. So find strength to rebuild from scratch. It might take a year, 5 or even 10, but time will pass anyways. And you only lose if you stop playing. Lots of love, - Dave🫶🏻

English
39
66
614
58.4K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@ecomchigga It’s weird how making money without ‘suffering’ for it makes people feel guilty. It’s way more common than you’d think.
English
0
0
1
257
🀅
🀅@ecomchigga·
Life update nobody asked for but I need to share: Turned 18 last month and finally told my parents how much I actually make online. My dad literally didn't believe me until I showed him my Stripe dashboard. He just stared at the screen for like 2 minutes straight. Then asked if it was legal lmao. For context: He owns a restaurant. Works 70 hours a week. Makes good money but kills himself for it. I work from my laptop 3-4 hours a day and made more than him this year. The conversation got weird after that. Like he was proud but also kind of hurt? Like everything he taught me about "hard work" was wrong. Truth is, he wasn't wrong. I learned work ethic washing dishes in his kitchen at 15. That job funded my first failed dropshipping store. That failure taught me to pivot to digital products. Without his restaurant, there's no $600K year. The real mindfuck? I could buy the restaurant now. The same place where I was making $12/hour just 2 years ago. Not going to obviously. But the fact that I COULD is insane. Money doesn't hit the same when your parents don't understand how you make it. Anyway, taking them to Italy next month. First real vacation they've had in 5 years. That's the flex that actually matters.
English
95
109
7.6K
833.5K
Valdo
Valdo@reachvaldo·
You don’t have the How To Build Funnels And Influence Customers? like + reply “How” and I’ll DM it to you for FREE.
Valdo tweet media
English
868
161
1.5K
108.2K
Cee☆
Cee☆@ceelasylviaa·
only 52 days until christmas 🎅🏻🧣🎄
Cee☆ tweet mediaCee☆ tweet mediaCee☆ tweet mediaCee☆ tweet media
English
69
7.8K
21.1K
582K
this tweet
this tweet@thistweeth·
@vexian Your autism is the gift that keeps on giving 🥹
English
0
0
0
76