Kyle Thornhill

We now have clear evidence that the COVID-19 mRNA shots have crippled the reproductive capacity of humanity. In animal models, they destroy over 60% of women’s non-renewable egg supply. In human data (n=1.3M), vaccinated women have ~33% fewer successful pregnancies. The latest study found “vaccine” mRNA and spike protein invade the human placenta and fetal cells. 37% of placentas from vaccinated mothers contained spike protein.

270 women got pregnant while participating in Pfizer COVID jab trials‼️ Only 36 women recorded a pregnancy‼️ The other 234 pregnancies were "lost"‼️ Over 80% lost their babies‼️🙏👇

🚨BREAKING: Medical Cartel Sues RFK Jr. for Pulling COVID Shot Recommendation for Kids and Pregnant Women Despite overwhelming evidence of harm, the AAP, ACP, APHA, and IDSA are fighting to keep poisoning children, pregnant women, and their unborn babies. The Cartel claims Kennedy lacked evidence. But that’s a lie: Pregnancy Harms: 🔻Chen et al: mRNA injections cross the placenta and reach the fetus. mRNA-1273 crosses within 1 hour, accumulates in fetal organs, translates into Spike protein, and persists after birth. 🔻Thorp et al: CDC/FDA safety signal thresholds breached for 37 adverse events following vaccination in pregnant women (miscarriage, stillbirth, fetal arrest) 🔻Karaman et al: mRNA shots destroy 60% of finite egg supply (primordial follicles) 🔻Manniche et al: (n=1.3M): ~33% fewer successful pregnancies in vaxxed women Child Harms: 🔻Friedberg et al (n=493K): +23% autoimmune disease post-vax, none from COVID infection 🔻Feldstein et al (CDC): Vaxxed kids 257% more likely to get symptomatic COVID 🔻Berg et al: +20% ER visits, +17% doctor visits after months after injection 🔻OpenSAFELY (n>1M): Myocarditis only in vaxxed kids, no COVID deaths 🔻Mead et al: Vax-induced myocarditis worse & more common than infection—risks far outweigh theoretical benefits.

Important 🧵on our new peer-reviewed paper: The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid. They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17

Post 1. A Look Back at the “Pandemic”: The Data, the Raw Truth, and What We Must Ensure Never Occurs Again 18th February 2026 As the world emerges from the shadow of the COVID-19 crisis, now more than six years after its initial outbreak, a sober reassessment is overdue. What began as a global health emergency morphed into a saga of unprecedented policy interventions, economic upheaval, and societal division. Yet, beneath the headlines of surging cases and heroic medical efforts lies a more troubling story: one of inflated metrics, suppressed debates, and avoidable harms inflicted not just by the virus, but by the very measures meant to contain it. Drawing on extensive data from health authorities, scientific studies, and post-mortem analyses, this article dissects the raw truths that emerged, truths often obscured during the frenzy. It also charts a path forward, insisting on reforms rooted in transparency, evidence, and respect for individual freedoms to prevent such missteps from recurring. The Illusion of Scale: How Testing and Metrics Magnified the Threat From the outset, the pandemic's perceived magnitude was shaped by diagnostic tools and reporting practices that, in hindsight, often exaggerated the burden. Routine hospital testing during the Omicron wave, for instance, revealed that up to 41% of "COVID-19 patients" in Canadian studies were incidental positives, individuals admitted for unrelated conditions but flagged by sensitive PCR tests. These tests, capable of detecting non-viable viral fragments long after infectivity, contributed to inflated case counts, turning hospitals into apparent hotspots while masking the true drivers of illness. In the US, estimates suggested incidental rates of 30-70% during Omicron, potentially doubling perceived hospital strain. This overcounting was not mere oversight; it stemmed from inconsistent global metrics. Countries varied wildly in defining cases and deaths, some included probable positives without confirmation, others required lab results, rendering cross-border comparisons futile. Genomic sequencing, essential for tracking waves and variants, was patchy at best, with biases in sampling and low coverage in low-income regions obscuring true surge patterns. The result? A narrative of unrelenting catastrophe that may have overstated the virus's reach, fueling policies disproportionate to the actual threat. Even excess deaths, often cited as the most reliable gauge, were estimates riddled with modeling uncertainties, influenced by policy harms rather than the virus alone. In Canada, where the average COVID death involved an 82-year-old with 2.6 comorbidities, negligence in long-term care homes, understaffing, isolation, and poor infection control, drove much of the toll, with for-profit facilities showing 25% higher mortality. The Veil of Uncertainty: Origins and the Suppression of Inquiry Six years on, the virus's origins remain shrouded in ambiguity, a testament to global opacity. The World Health Organization's 2025 report deemed zoonotic spillover "best supported" but inconclusive, hampered by China's withheld lab records and early samples. US intelligence splits persist, with some agencies favoring a lab incident amid low-confidence assessments. This unresolved puzzle underscores a broader failure: the pandemic's start may predate Wuhan's December 2019 cases, yet incomplete data leaves us guessing.

Interesting, it appears the data shows the "clot shots" actually decrease heart attack risk. The antivax narrative is falling apart...