
I have gone through the premise and conclusion of your post but the tweet fail to answer these two points which are the crust of my earlier post: 1. If you’re aware of a flat fee, why didn’t you pay the latter lawyer you offered 5k & VSOP? Or even suggest that to the Silk and have the negotiation process. 2. Your comparison with other profession isn’t relevant to this issue & circumstance of this case. Hence, I’ll leave that aside. My analysis from your perspective reflects that you took advantage of the latter lawyer (and you even came online to brag about it)— that is the ridicule. Because you could have paid much more than the paltry sum–5k that you offered. You see where I am coming from, Dr?! I’m sure you are aware of these issues. That you’re no longer a practicing lawyer doesn’t mean you should put others out of business. Thank you, sir.



















