
TIM
10.5K posts

TIM
@timalive
Tim Vieyra. Springbok Rugby, Tech and Archeology
Cape Town Katılım Ekim 2008
475 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
TIM retweetledi

I've never felt this much behind as a programmer. The profession is being dramatically refactored as the bits contributed by the programmer are increasingly sparse and between. I have a sense that I could be 10X more powerful if I just properly string together what has become available over the last ~year and a failure to claim the boost feels decidedly like skill issue. There's a new programmable layer of abstraction to master (in addition to the usual layers below) involving agents, subagents, their prompts, contexts, memory, modes, permissions, tools, plugins, skills, hooks, MCP, LSP, slash commands, workflows, IDE integrations, and a need to build an all-encompassing mental model for strengths and pitfalls of fundamentally stochastic, fallible, unintelligible and changing entities suddenly intermingled with what used to be good old fashioned engineering. Clearly some powerful alien tool was handed around except it comes with no manual and everyone has to figure out how to hold it and operate it, while the resulting magnitude 9 earthquake is rocking the profession. Roll up your sleeves to not fall behind.
English

Wait, does this mean costco hotdogs were wildly overpriced in the 80s?!
World of Statistics@stats_feed
🌭 The price of a Costco Hot dog every year since it was introduced: 1984: $1.50 1985: $1.50 1986: $1.50 1987: $1.50 1988: $1.50 1989: $1.50 1990: $1.50 1991: $1.50 1992: $1.50 1993: $1.50 1994: $1.50 1995: $1.50 1996: $1.50 1997: $1.50 1998: $1.50 1999: $1.50 2000: $1.50 2001: $1.50 2002: $1.50 2003: $1.50 2004: $1.50 2005: $1.50 2006: $1.50 2007: $1.50 2008: $1.50 2009: $1.50 2010: $1.50 2011: $1.50 2012: $1.50 2013: $1.50 2014: $1.50 2015: $1.50 2016: $1.50 2017: $1.50 2018: $1.50 2019: $1.50 2020: $1.50 2021: $1.50 2022: $1.50 2023: $1.50 2024: $1.50 2025: $1.50
English

The general take from SA rugby X
Front Row Grunt@FrontRowGrunt
Pig dog ugly. What an incredibly sad way to end the year ...
English


@SawyerMerritt The argument for index funds holds up when they are a small proportion of the market (low cost, market know best) but falls apart at higher proportions (erodes the fundamental market mechanism - which is decisions based on skin in the game)
English

NEWS: The White House is considering new steps to limit the power of proxy advisers like Glass Lewis and ISS, as well as major index-fund managers — a move both Elon Musk and Jamie Dimon have publicly called for.
Trump administration officials are discussing at least one executive that could include a broad ban on shareholder recommendations or an order blocking recommendations on companies that have engaged proxy advisers for consulting work.
Officials also are exploring limits on how index-fund managers are allowed to vote, seeking to curtail the power of such behemoths as BlackRock, Vanguard Group and State Street. These three together own on behalf of clients roughly 30% or more of many of the biggest U.S. publicly traded companies. One measure being discussed would require these index-fund managers to mirror their votes in line with clients who choose to vote.
This is would be great news if they implement this!

English

A founder of a SF-based startup asked why are we not using AI to code, or an app called Cursor (??)
He said it writes code 10x faster than humans an everyone uses it in Silicon Valley
I asked him: “but who reviews the code for compliance?”
He looked confused and said “dude what we just ship it to prod”
I started sweating from anger but calmed myself and explained that in Europe, we have a Software Quality Assurance Board that reviews every line of code before deployment
He said that must “kill momentum”
I said momentum without oversight kills startups, and promptly called California authorities to report unreviewed code deployment at the startup
They asked me to stop calling them every day with “stupid shit”
Silicon Valley is completely doomed
English
TIM retweetledi

Super Sacha leads the Boks centurion celebrations for Siya keo.co.za/super-sacha-le…
English

@scrumming_ten A trip to ellis park is an ordeal. I say move to another ground outside the CBD
English

@akshay_pachaar Assuming it would need to start with some kind of minimal viable model
English

Did Stanford just kill LLM fine-tuning?
This new paper from Stanford, called Agentic Context Engineering (ACE), proves something wild: you can make models smarter without changing a single weight.
Here's how it works:
Instead of retraining the model, ACE evolves the context itself. The model writes its own prompt, reflects on what worked and what didn't, then rewrites it. Over and over. It becomes a self-improving system.
Think of it like the model keeping a living notebook where every failure becomes a lesson and every success becomes a rule.
The results are impressive:
- 10.6% better than GPT-4-powered agents on AppWorld
- 8.6% improvement on financial reasoning tasks
- 86.9% lower cost and latency
No labeled data required. Just feedback loops.
Here's the counterintuitive part:
Everyone's chasing short, clean prompts. ACE does the opposite. It builds dense, evolving playbooks that compound over time.
Turns out LLMs don't need simplicity. They need context density.
The question here is how to manage all this information and experience.
This is where building a real-time memory layer for Agents (eg. @zep_ai ) can be a great solution and active area of research going forward.
What are your thoughts?
I have linked the paper in the next tweet!
____
If you found it insightful, reshare with your network.
Find me → @akshay_pachaar ✔️
For more insights and tutorials on LLMs, AI Agents, and Machine Learning!

English











