Lultimate ⭐
6.8K posts

Lultimate ⭐
@timatilos
decentralized AI enthusiast

🦞 Openclaw update fix If your agents are hitting exec approval walls after the latest update, the fix is three settings: In exec-approvals.json defaults: - security: "full" - ask: "off" - askFallback: "full" In openclaw.json: - tools.exec.security: "full" - tools.exec.strictInlineEval: "false" Then restart gateway. The allowlist wildcard * alone isn't enough. There's a second policy layer that gates complex commands independently.

Hi everyone, There are a few important things we want to clarify, along with how we’re moving forward and how we plan to solve the current situation First, what happened is extremely unfortunate for everyone, and especially for us. We’ve spent day and night building Quasar with the goal of contributing something meaningful to Bittensor and making it something we’re all proud of What exactly happened is still unclear. The important part is that our devices were not compromised, which is a positive sign. Beyond that, we’re still investigating, but right now our focus is on moving forward rather than speculating. We sincerely apologize for anything we may have said in the heat of the moment. We ask for your understanding we’ve effectively lost our work twice under circumstances we don’t fully understand. We followed all known security practices, but clearly there’s more to learn. That said, we don’t want to turn this into a blame game. Our focus is the future of the subnet And we are still building Moving forward: The coldkey will be held by @const_reborn to ensure maximum security. We will focus on research and engineering. We will continue improving the subnet and its core systems. Everything we’re doing comes from a genuine effort to build something valuable within Bittensor and we will continue The subnet is still active. We will be making changes on mainnet, including a rebrand focused on distillation into the Quasar architecture





No idea what she’s saying, but I fully support her… God I love french foids






$TAO > $BTC? Sounds controversial, but I think it’s worth thinking about. I spent time digging into community insights, podcasts, and perspectives from people like Barry Silbert. The more I looked into it, the more this started to make sense. [1] Same structure as Bitcoin, but with higher utility – 21M supply cap, 4-year halving – Fair launch, no VC, no premine But the key difference: – BTC → Proof of Work (network security). – TAO → Proof of Useful Work (real AI output). → Same energy cost, completely different output. [2] $TAO | @opentensor creates value, not just stores it According to Barry Silbert: – BTC spends billions yearly on security – TAO directs that incentive into solving real problems → AI, data, compute, agents become direct outputs [3] TAO is still early – BTC: ~17 years old, massive market cap – TAO: ~4 years, still building infra Many compare TAO today to Bitcoin in 2011. → The upside profile is completely different. [4] This is a bigger narrative than money BTC solves: – ownership of money TAO is moving toward: – ownership of intelligence. – anyone can train models. – anyone can monetize AI. – no reliance on Big Tech. → This is a new economic layer. [5] Recent performance is starting to reflect this – TAO has outperformed BTC during AI runs. – Institutional attention is growing (Grayscale, major listings). → This looks like early signals, not the top $BTC remains a core asset, I still hold it. But in terms of upside and narrative in the AI era, $TAO has a clearer positioning. Trust in $TAO. Ofc, NFA.



















