Tim Fattig

@TheRealCurly5 Researchers want a name to go with the face, whether it’s “Mexico City Oswald” or “John Doe #2.” Certain people already know who they are, but we’re not getting that information either.

@timfattig 60 plus years, and the CIA has still yet to provide a photo of Lee Harvey Oswald in Mexico City. Yet these are the photos that they handed over to the HSCA. The most damming pieces of an imposter, but Joannides is more important to some.

We need more info about this guy. If he’s not a Cuban himself, I’m sure Cuban intel had at least a few working theories.

Scott’s comment to Col. King, that it was “a certain person who is known to you,” is what makes it so bizarre. Had he made the comment to a Howard Hunt type, or someone similar, it could refer to any of a hundred different people or nationalities. But he says it to the damn chief of WHD.

@timfattig Are you referring to Roger Stone or Lee Oswald? But seriously, I've always wondered how this guy was never identified by somebody. He doesn't seem to be disguised. Logic says he was working for the Exiles, the CIA, or the US Army, but no takers? Soviet?

@Rick714Canes Absolutely! (Love book #1 by the way!)

@timfattig I would love to get my hands on my dad’s Cuban file. Book number 2. 🤣🐒🐒🐒🐒🐒

Oh, quite the opposite. The Agency man in Mexico City, Winston Scott, was pretty straightforward about CIA being aware of the person’s identity, and very early on in the story. Hours after the assassination, Scott wrote to his superior, Col. Joseph C. King, and noted he would be sending along photographs of “a certain person who is known to you.”

yes! the most amazing thing about the scant CIA files which do confirm the existence of these photos, then other files deny this photos exist ("they were lost")... but i see zero files where CIA asks themselves "who even is this guy?" maybe files like this do not exist, maybe they never wrote any of it down, maybe discussion about these photos only happened within a tiny group of glowies at the highest levels of CIA. which means they all knew it was a frame job and then a cover up

Uh, @RepNancyMace, you won’t believe this…

Jack White and Robert Groden opened up a Pandora’s Box with their persistent claims of forgery re: the backyard photos, leading almost inevitably to claims of the Zapruder film being faked and, over on JFK Facebook, we are now being told *checks notes* that Jack Ruby didn’t shoot Lee Harvey Oswald, and Jackie Kennedy somehow managed to put on a different pink suit between Dealey Plaza and the swearing-in of Lyndon Johnson.

@_MateoCocinero @noporkestra A mansion has many rooms.

@timfattig @noporkestra I partly agree but I think it’s throwing the baby out with the bath water. Which I sorta have Livingstonian thinking about in that, that’s how the Alphabet Agencies keep the research “community” chasing their tail. I take more of a RICO approach with connections

@timgproject Always a great conversation!

Episode 37 with Joseph McBride will be released tomorrow.

@_MateoCocinero @noporkestra Yeah, but the impossible “confession” from Trafficante just torpedoes the rest of the book. And Selwyn Raab should have known better. That book certainly wasn’t his first rodeo.

@timfattig @noporkestra I think the important part of it is the connection between Hoffa, traffacante, and Marcello via Regano

@noporkestra Wasserman and Ragano, mob lawyers, and their high-profile clients, gangsters Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante, Jr. Ragano later wrote what is probably the dumbest “mob memoir” not authored by someone named Giancana.

@timfattig Remind us please, who’s in this photo? Thanks

This is a fantastic overview from the always reliable @bartholoviews on the state of the JFK declassifications under President Trump, one year after the wheels began to turn. bartholoviews.substack.com/p/non-disclosu…

Flynn and a lot of the MAGA crowd: they post old, outdated, or mildly relevant JFK-assassination material for the clicks (I’m including Tucker here, who is big-picture right, and at the other end Ben Shapiro’s Posner-platforming ass), but don’t really bring up how much material is still under embargo or the practical steps to freeing that material.

@timfattig What’s your point Tim? Who are you talking about?

He was talking about the communists, in a speech delivered about three months into his presidency. He was not talking about the Deep State or the Israelis or the Freemasons or any other individuals or organizations. Don’t make this a fringe dog-whistle. Context matters. Timing matters. You can do better than this, @GenFlynn, and you should do better than this.

@timgproject @BoardJfk The JFK assassination is a bright, findable thread that is woven through so much of the history that follows it. But it is not Original Sin. 11/22/63 is not Day One. We have to continue to look backwards.

The public deserves to know the truth about why and elected President was murdered. Instead we get the hogwash from “the establishment” like my friend @BoardJfk said to me earlier.

@jeffersonmorley It’s breathtaking when any Trump-adjacent pol or media figure says “we now know what happened to JFK,” but says nothing, and does even less, to help get the remaining JFK files released.

@timfattig Flynn doesn't know JFK and his arguments are weak. He says we should trust Trump when he says there's an imminent threat? Did Trump trust George W. Bush when he made the same BS claim? No. It was not a fact-based argument.