@ThePaddedMeowth No, blaming others for the way you treat people is just a way to feign responsibility.
English
DunkinNerds
4.4K posts
DunkinNerds
@tipacole
I argue with people on here quite a bit
Katılım Nisan 2015
143 Takip Edilen50 Takipçiler
I think both of these are bad actually.
RadioGenoa@RadioGenoa
A difference of over 1400 years.
English
Historicaly you are right. But lets not forget to mention that these so called "Christians" you give credit to were also sorcerers, occult praticoners. And heretics.
Wendell@wendelltalks
There is no dichotomy between Christianity and science, I suggest atheists research how many scientists are Christian.
English
There is no dichotomy between Christianity and science, I suggest atheists research how many scientists are Christian.
AstroYT@Astro_Strategy
@wendelltalks So Christianity finally accepts that science is correct, instead of just coping and trying and failing to prove it false? That's great and all... But how would that prove Christianity "right"? But anyway, congrats on admitting and accepting that science is correct!
English
satan isn't real
satan isn't real
satan isn't real
Satan isn't real
GodlyAction@GodlyAction
Porn is satanic. Abortion is satanic. Homosexuality is satanic. Transgenderism is satanic.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger Already did, please refer to the previous tweets
Also: WE WOOOON, ANGLOPHONE LOSER, MALVINAS FOREVER, ANGLOPHONES COMPLETELY OUT OF THE WORLD CUP, LFG, WE WON
English
Your moral compass is the government?
Your moral compass is a roulette wheel
Typell 🍎@prototypell
it's cool how Christians think they have some kind of morality advantage when their position is that a guy exists who tells them what to do Atheists have that also, it's called the government
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger Do you believe it is? Why? Where does objective morality come from?
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger You aren't actualy adressing the problem you are just asserting its not the same lol.
Yes or no. Is it objectively wrong to kill children.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger You can just say you didn't understand
It's not "everyone but god"
It's "this is bad cuz God says so"
God says "human, don't mate with animals" therefore mating with animals is bad, it's simple
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger Probably didnt see it, you are too busy philbro larping.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger What kind of projection is this bruv, either make an argument or say nothing lol
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger Rich coming from someone with no honesty or intellect. I would grandstand and run away if i had no response to the actual argument too.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger It's called intellectual honesty
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger Its funny you think its impossible to know what position someone holds unless they have made an argument for it.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger Crab didn't argue anything yet so this reply is funny
English
Eesti
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger Ope. Nice lil dodge there. Thats not what i said. You cannot say its objectively wrong to do anything PERIOD. If there exists an agent that CAN do it without it being wrong.. redefining objective as everyone but god is a cute lil attempt though.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger It is intrinsically and objectively wrong for humans to kill humans, yes
Meanwhile you don't believe this since your morality is merely subjective, there's no objective truth in your thinking
Put the fries in the bag
English
@FaithAndAnger @Crabemojiiscool @AnxietatemPlena Homie you admited the government does much worse, which implies that what god did was still bad, just not as bad as what the government does. You are implicitly admitting your god does bad shit. Like comon.
English
@Crabemojiiscool @AnxietatemPlena @tipacole You call it a cult so you can dismiss it, not because it's an accurate term in any way.
Critical thinking my ass.
English
@AnxietatemPlena @FaithAndAnger Yes, so you are committed to saying its not objectively wrong to kill kids.
English
@tipacole @FaithAndAnger If He is goodness then it was good
He is goodness
So it was good
There is no need to "justify" it, it is intrinsically justified
English