Tobias J. Kreidl, PhD

@3orovik Delusional!

Trump is playing 4D chess - War ends -> oil drops - inflation collapses - Powell out -> Kevin Warsh cuts rates - Liquidity floods into the economy - Markets giga pump (including crypto) Right into midterms Republicans sweep. That’s the plan

@DaniDonald72 @SenRandPaul 9/11 was the one case the treaty kicked in and it was followed to help the US. The treaty says nothing about aiding if a NATO member attacks another nation. Clear now?

@tkreidl @SenRandPaul Well if NATO didn't follow the treaty and help the US, I'd say that's a breach of contract

President Trump is right to strongly consider leaving NATO. I support the President’s constitutional authority under Article II to withdraw from any treaty — including NATO — without needing Senate approval. Congress tried to block that with the 2023 Kaine-Rubio provision in the NDAA, but the Constitution grants the executive power to the president. thehill.com/homenews/admin…

@EricLDaugh The BS just keeps getting less and less credible. What a sign of desperation.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! In front of MILLIONS of Americans President Trump exposes Barack Hussein Obama for giving Iran cash used to terrorize the world "Hussein Obama gave them $1.7 billion in cash, green, green cash! Took it out of banks from Virginia, D.C., and Maryland." "All the cash they had flew it by airplanes in an attempt to buy their respect and loyalty, but it didn't work." "They LAUGHED at our President and went on with their mission to have a nuclear bomb!" "His Iran deal would have led to a colossal arsenal of massive nuclear weapons for Iran, and they would have had them years ago, and they would have used them, would have been a different world." Traitor!

@Conservative2TX Yeah, why should he care about the plight of so many Americans who struggle on a daily basis to make ends meet? He is totally oblivious of anyone's situation outside of his circle of 1%-ers. As the common citizen suffers, remember whom you voted for.

Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things. Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things. Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things. Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things.

@SenRandPaul It has likely nothing to do with the Constitution; it's an internal agreement among NATO members. It would be in any case a ridiculous move, though 47 has managed to tick off a lot of what one hopes are still allies.

The Constitution’s silence on treaty withdrawal means that the president retains the executive authority to remove the United States from treaty obligations. The Founders were wise to make it be difficult to enter into treaty obligations and easy to withdraw from them once they were no longer in the national interest.

@EricLDaugh The only confirmation is that whatever is said will be a pack of lies.

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump is about to CONFIRM that victory is imminent in Iran during his primetime White House address tonight 1. Confirm a 2-3 week time table to END the war 2. Operational update on Epic Fury progress 3. Highlight major US military successes 🔥🔥

@FrankLuntz This is a pure backing out posturing because the plans failed and he's trying to backpedal. It just points to this ill-conceived "undertaking" being doomed from the beginning, all at extreme cost of human lives, financially, and politically -- domestically as well as globally.

President Trump says the primary objective of preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon has been achieved. He added that he's not concerned about the enriched uranium that Iran still possesses: “That’s so far underground, I don’t care about that.” reuters.com/world/middle-e…

@PressSec Caveat emptor!

Apply to be a White House Intern: The White House Internship Program is a public service leadership program that provides an opportunity to gain professional experience and build leadership skills. The deadline to apply for the fall is April 6th! 🇺🇸 whitehouse.gov/internships/

@mitchellvii Fortunately, it's not your decision since you've no legal expertise and are simply an opinionated, brainwashed sycophant. The Constitution is what counts, not fealty to any individual or organization. Justice must have nothing to do with party affiliation or anything except laws.

SCOTUS DISASTER: Under normal circumstances, a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court should rule birthright citizenship unconstitutional in a slam dunk decision. Unfortunately, when you have RINOs like Roberts, Barrett, and Gorsuch on the court, you never know what's going to happen. It really is unfortunate that we have such a tremendous advantage, and yet can't seem to stop shooting ourselves in the foot! What is it about Republicans that they just completely are incapable of playing team ball? We'll have to wait and see. But with these three on the court, I don't have any great hopes.

@CyberRacheal D. QOS. The others are just either security-related (VPN, TLS) or providing network flexibility (VLANs).

What technology prioritizes critical network traffic over browsing and social media? A. VPN B. TLS C. VLANs D. QoS

@EricLDaugh Sauer is doing a horrible job at defending this non-issue. SCOTUS will ultimately uphold what is in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which is plainly written, regardless what the original intentions were, and has stayed solid for almost 160 years.

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito says it PERFECTLY on birthright citizenship He suggests that just because illegal aliens were not a problem at the time the 14th Amendment was adopted does NOT mean they shouldn't be addressed today Nailed it. ALITO: "Justice Scalia had an example that dealt with this situation. He imagined an old theft statute that was enacted well before anybody conceived of a microwave oven, and then afterwards someone is charged with the crime of stealing a microwave oven, and this fellow says, well, I can't be convicted under this because the microwave oven didn't exist at that time." "And he dismissed that. There's a general rule there, and you apply it to future applications. And what we're dealing with here is something that was basically unknown at the time when the 14th Amendment was adopted, which is illegal immigration. So how do we deal with that situation when we have a general rule?" JOHN SAUER: "Yeah, I strongly agree with the way that you framed it, that there is a general principle that's a broad principle that's adopted in the phrase, subject to the jurisdiction thereof, and we submit that our theory of allegiance and domicile-based allegiance is what explains those specific exceptions that everybody was aware of, but it is broad enough to sweep in future situations, and as you pointed out, illegal immigration did not exist then." You can almost ALWAYS count on Alito!

@allenanalysis There is a fundamental difference between defense and offense. What an idiotic remark to make, knowing very well that the U.S> and Israel started attacking Iran, and not even having informed any other nations about these so-called "plans." Another pathetic posturing by Rubio.

🚨JUST IN: Marco Rubio on Fox News: “Since NATO isn’t allowing us to use their bases — why are we in NATO? We’re going to have to reexamine the value of this alliance.” NATO was founded in 1949. Article 5 — collective defense — was invoked once in history, after September 11th. Every NATO ally showed up for America. America started a war without consulting NATO. Without congressional authorization. Without allied support. On a feeling. Now Rubio is questioning the alliance because allies won’t fight America’s unilateral war.

@EricLDaugh It was all open before 47 started this catastrophic, expensive, poorly planned disaster. Congratulations on achieving $4/gallon gasoline, inflation, a huge and rising federal deficit, and overall still high prices.

🚨 BREAKING: The United Arab Emirates is now planning to open the Strait of Hormuz BY FORCE with OTHER allies, after President Trump said "fend for yourselves!" — WSJ GOOD! No free rides. The whole world should be enforcing this. Trump's plan is going to work! 🇺🇸

@highbrow_nobrow Johnson is a liar, a brainwashed sycophant, and inept beyond belief. He will be remembered as one of the worst SoH in U.S. history.

"We're not at war, we have no intention at being at war. The president and the DOD have made it very clear, this is a limited operation." - Mike Johnson says there’s no need to constrain Trump’s war powers since the U.S. isn’t actually at war. (Mar. 2026)

@War_Radar2 Withdrawing from NATO requires a formal, one-year notice of denunciation under Article 13 of the treaty . For the U.S., a 2023 federal law prohibits unilateral presidential withdrawal, requiring either a two-thirds Senate vote or an Act of Congress to approve such a decision.

BREAKING 🇺🇸🇪🇺: Marco Rubio warns NATO could become a “one-way street” if the U.S. cannot access allied bases in times of need. “If we can’t use those bases when we need them, then NATO loses its purpose,” Rubio said. “Why are we in NATO if, in our time of need, we can’t rely on those allies? We’re going to have to reexamine the value of NATO and what the alliance truly offers our country.” The remarks come amid growing tensions and debates over NATO’s role in supporting U.S. operations abroad.

@aleksthgrt Withdrawing from NATO requires a formal, one-year notice of denunciation under Article 13 of the treaty . For the U.S., a 2023 federal law prohibits unilateral presidential withdrawal, requiring either a two-thirds Senate vote or an Act of Congress to approve such a decision.

🚨BREAKING NEWS Following US President Donald Trump's serious consideration of withdrawing from NATO, it is reported that the US will withdraw all its personnel, military equipment, and nuclear warheads from Europe, and will also end all intelligence and security flows.

@bluesamk @RpsAgainstTrump It doesn't seem to be working in his favor ...

@RpsAgainstTrump The reason presidents don't attend such hearings is to maintain the independence of the judiciary. Sadly, Trump wants to intimidate his appointees.

BREAKING: Trump is sitting front row at the Supreme Court as justices hear arguments on his unconstitutional order to end birthright citizenship. He’s the first sitting president ever to attend oral arguments. Feels like this stunt could backfire bigly

@RpsAgainstTrump He things he can intimidate the justices, is that why he's there? So far, the arguments for this executive order are not going very well. This is yet another campaign promise unlikely to happen.

@EricLDaugh Just another idiotic posturing by this inept administration that doesn't understand nor follow laws. But the brainwashed sycophants will continue to believe all the lies and false propaganda.

@EricLDaugh Withdrawing from NATO requires a formal, one-year notice of denunciation under Article 13 of the treaty. For the U.S., a 2023 federal law prohibits unilateral presidential withdrawal, requiring either a two-thirds Senate vote or an Act of Congress to approve such a decision.

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: The US may leave NATO and even Secretary of State MARCO RUBIO just put them on blast "If we can't use those bases to defend American interests, then NATO is a ONE-WAY STREET!" "Why are we in NATO?! You have to ask!" 🔥 FAFO.