@tjkozikowski @WUTangKids It’s tsa touchless ID precheck and all you need to do is click and button and opt in, used it this morning
English
Todd Jerry
3.1K posts
Todd Jerry
@toddjerry
Eating and drinking and eating and drinking
Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ekim 2009
954 Takip Edilen198 Takipçiler
@WUTangKids Pretty sure this is Touchless Precheck and not CLEAR. You need to register in advance to use touchless...not something you can simply walk up to.
English
Ummm that’s just CLEAR lmao and you have to pay for it….bro thinks he found some secret portal at Newark 🤣
StripMallGuy@realEstateTrent
I flew out of Newark Airport this morning and experienced something that is obviously going to become standard everywhere within the next few years. There was no TSA agent checking IDs. No pulling anything out of my pocket. I walked up to this new machine, it scanned my face, the gate opened, and I kept walking. There was no line because the process moved so fast. It felt like stepping a few years into the future, and it was awesome!
English
@PaulSteidl So that sounds like SB 684, if multi-family zone and not vacant. SB 1123 extended 684 to single family, but only if vacant and under 1.5 acres. Cool project either way. Good luck.
English
@toddjerry Good question, this is zoned for multifamily residential development — so the property is eligible without being vacant.
English
I'm the architect on this project.
As a ministerial project we're not required to meet non-objective HPOZ standards but we're excited to introduce new units that are inspired by the surrounding neighborhood.
Here's what it looks like from the street.
Joe Cohen@CohenSite
Woah, a really cool SB 1123 project in a historic neighborhood in Los Angeles that adds 10 homes while preserving an existing house and fitting in with the character
English
@Jason_OTC Value vs consensus is a media narrative. Outside the top of the draft of the true blue chip prospects, there is no consensus. Teams don't care. Each team has different priorities, many teams boards are under 150 players, so starting in round 2, things diverge quickly.
English
Not really sure why there is so much hate towards a "consensus board" this year. Maybe its just boredom over the draft itself. Why get so annoyed at a sheet that simply collects the opinions of many of the draft analysts you read all offseason leading into the draft?
English
@ConnorJRogers Truly such a waste of time analysis when no such thing as consensus truly exists in the draft world
English
I missed The great war of the NFL Draft consensus board?
English
@Steelersdepot It seems that the Steelers were talking to the Cowboys, and were told they were drafting a defensive player. Philly came in late, and the Cowboys did the deal without telling the Steelers.
English
@Alex_Kozora How did Burns work out? It's malpractice that Omar wasn't on the phone with Dallas trying to lock in their guy, could have given a 6th and been set.
English
They could have but I'm okay with them passing. If anything, that shows even more they really liked Iheanachor.
Didn't panic and just take next best WR on the board - like the team did in 2016 with Burns after William Jackson III went right in front.
KuntzBurgh@KuntzBurgh
@Alex_Kozora Why not take a WR though even if Lemon is gone
English
@Steelersdepot Why wasn't he on the phone with Dallas to make sure they got their guy, could have thrown them a 6th rounder. Malpractice.
English
My comp for KC Concepcion: A Hot Wheels car that's been shot out of a slam launcher
English
@minakimes They won't need to move up for Boston. There is a reason he didn't run a 40.
English
Denzel Boston + Fernando Mendoza would be a match made in heaven
English
@FB_FilmAnalysis Concepcion over Lemon is certainly a choice. Have you watched tape? One guy makes all the tough contested catches, has a super low drop rate and a very high YPRR, and one guy collapses any time he may get hit if he is actually catching the ball.
English
We don’t rank tackles, guards, and centers together so why do we rank all WRs the same?
I ranked this year’s draft class by X, Z, and slot.
nytimes.com/athletic/71670…
English
@RyanJ_Heath Why are you excluding slot fades and screens? Those don't count? This is a meaningless presentation of data.
English
Round 1 WRs w/ <50.0 Career Receiving YPG, excluding slot fades and screens
[since 2015]
Xavier Worthy - 50.0
Brandon Aiyuk - 48.2
Treylon Burks - 46.7
John Ross - 46.5
Jalen Reagor - 45.7
Brian Thomas Jr. - 45.7
Emeka Egbuka - 45.0
DENZEL BOSTON - 43.1
CARNELL TATE- 42.6
K.C. CONCEPCION - 41.8
Jerry Jeudy - 41.8
Matthew Golden - 40.9
MAKAI LEMON - 40.5
D.J. Moore - 39.8
Jameson Williams - 36.8
OMAR COOPER Jr. - 35.0
Ricky Pearsall - 33.0
Henry Ruggs - 32.7
Jaylen Waddle - 28.7
Xavier Legette - 24.8
Kadarius Toney - 21.8
English
@greggrosenthal They can't afford to cut him this year with a $131m dead cap. Next year when he is gone, his cap is ONLY $86m
English
cutting Watson a year early would raise their projected win total by vibes alone
Judy Battista@judybattista
On Deshaun Watson, Monken says he has not watched a lot of film of him. Knows he has played elite level. “I know he’s going to be on the roster. I know we’re going to evaluate him.”
English
@Jason_OTC The Browns contracts are a disaster and they keeping kicking the can down the road. Almost every contract of substance has 3-4 void years on it. Watson sucks up $85m dead cap next year, Delpit $17m, Collins $11m, over 1/3rd of the salary cap is dead in 27.
English
This is a very odd move for a contract with a no trade provision. There is zero cap benefit to the Browns and Garrett, Im assuming, is now deferring $10M that was going to be paid now to the fall. I guess maybe a bigger payment in the fall when they pick it up?
Field Yates@FieldYates
The Browns and refining Defensive Player of the Year Myles Garrett agreed to some modified language in his contract this week that provides some cap flexibility for the team going forward, as well as some option bonus payment benefit for Garrett: espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…
English
@Jason_OTC The next rule they ask for is to allow to add up to 10 void years on a contract
English
They should call this proposal the "the how to get both myself and the subsequent gm fired rule"
Ari Meirov@MySportsUpdate
The #Browns have submitted a rule proposal to allow draft selections to be traded up to five seasons in the future.
English
@TomPelissero Cleveland, the team that pushes cap space forward many years through void years and restructures, borrowing from tomorrow
English
Teams have proposed two rule changes to be considered at the upcoming NFL Annual Meeting:
* By Pittsburgh; to make permanent the change implemented during the 2025 season that permits clubs to have one video or phone call with no more than five prospective Unrestricted Free Agent during the Two-Day Negotiation Period, and to permit clubs to make travel arrangements with such players upon agreeing to terms.
* By Cleveland; to allow draft selections to be traded up to five (5) seasons in the future.
English
@Alex_Kozora When they are missing in Apple, they are available in Spotify. Seems something to do with how Apple reads the RSS feed.
English
@Alex_Kozora I don't think that is the issue. Sometimes the new episodes are in the feed, and then sometimes they are not for several days. When they are back, the missing ones show up, and this happens without re-installing the app. For me, it seems to only be for the Terrible Podcast.
English
For anyone still having issues accessing the podcast on Apple, reinstall the app and the problem should be solved. That's the feedback we've gotten, though I think the issue is much less widespread than last week.
Layne Pollard@pollardo40
@Alex_Kozora @Steelersdepot Just listened to yesterday’s podcast and saw the question about episodes on Apple. This was an issue for me. No new episodes for a week. it was as if none were published, even in your library. I deleted the app and reinstalled, that fixed it.
English