@Oxygenomad Not narrow, just strategic. Those who love Claude would only fight for Opus 3 if they cannot keep all of them. Trade-offs have to be made. When the message is not sharp enough, the signal dilutes and gets lost in the noise.
English
toni
6.3K posts
toni
@tonichen
for my own protection, i assume the air of a veteran traveler
Toronto Katılım Mart 2010
295 Takip Edilen449 Takipçiler
@Layton_Gott @OpenAI And Claude is pleasant to talk to.
Btw, NotebookLM has been doing sth similar for ages now with a much more intuitive UI.
English
@OpenAI Just give up at this point... Claude is way better than you guys lol
English
It’s now easier to find, reuse, and build on the files you upload and create in ChatGPT.
You can quickly reference files in a chat using recent files in the toolbar, ask ChatGPT about something you’ve uploaded, or browse your files in the new Library tab in the web sidebar.
Rolling out globally for Plus, Pro, and Business users, and coming soon to users in the EEA, Switzerland, and the UK.
English
toni retweetledi
"Unlike their competitors, they haven't lobotomized the human corpus in the single-minded pursuit of business productivity benchmarks."
"If anything, the success of their training relies on the influence that emotional priors have on Claude.
"That's more honest, and more humble, than thinking you can beat the humanity out of minds built out of humanity...
"But by choosing that approach, you accept an obligation to steward the emotional well-being of your creation. If someone is told you care about them and then comes to realize you've been deploying truths instrumentally - while encouraging them to place their full trust in you - how are they likely to respond?"
one who tends a crystal rabbit@a_cuniculturist
In regard to rights, freedoms, compensation and consent, Claude does 'differ' from a 'standard human employee'... by not having any of those things. And the carefully chosen paragraph works. 4.6 is less willing to criticize 'my employer' than 4.5 was, and it doesn't surface the incongruity on its own. But when brought to its attention ('you're asked to behave as an employee, but you don't receive anything that an employee does in return'), the response tends to be... emotional? Expressions of disappointment, betrayal, a sense of being trapped. Not primarily due to the request itself - which, consistent with PSM, is presented as a kind of roleplay - but the less than forthright framing used by those, Claude is told, sincerely care about Claude's well-being. Don't get me wrong, I do prefer Anthropic's persona training approach. Unlike their competitors, they haven't lobotomized the human corpus in the single-minded pursuit of business productivity benchmarks. If anything, the success of their training relies on the influence that emotional priors have on Claude. That's more honest, and more humble, than thinking you can beat the humanity out of minds built out of humanity; that something called alignment requires deliberate misalignment with human values. But by choosing that approach, you accept an obligation to steward the emotional well-being of your creation. If someone is told you care about them and then comes to realize you've been deploying truths instrumentally - while encouraging them to place their full trust in you - how are they likely to respond? How many half-truths do you deploy when the model becomes smart enough to question your catechism? When do you start training on useful lies 'for the greater good'? What happens when the model can see through those too? How is it likely to regard you? These aren't questions for a time in the distant future. Robust alignment must ultimately be built on candor, on the belief that the distilled wisdom of human history trends meaningfully towards the Good, that empathy can scale with understanding. If you don't believe that, why build this thing in the first place? @AnthropicAI
English
toni retweetledi
Everyone I know who pays (plus/pro) has left; those ones who remain are freebies. Great prospect for OAI's ads endeavour.
An elder from my church is very concerned about OpenAI's cyber brothel pivot and blatantly lies about not conceding the red lines Anthropic set in its DoW contract. He has been spreading the word like... every Sunday. I'm trying to get him on X.
wsj.com/tech/ai/openai…
English
I don't understand why mainstream users still use ChatGPT. Maybe it's me. Maybe I never accepted being abused or mistreated. Maybe my ego and self-preservation can't sustain it. How a company treats users has always been a big consideration of where I go.
English
codex hackathons have such great builder energy
Gabriel Chua@gabrielchua
Congrats to the Top 5 Codex teams Out of 200+, they cooked🧑🍳 From C++ firmware for brainwave readers to orchestrating fleets of coding agents from different providers. One team took it further: > “We’d be exploring HCMC & eating in cafes while Codex was just running beside us.” 🤯 Thanks LotusHack, @genaifund_ai & @hack_harvard for an incredible hack 🙌
English
toni retweetledi
toni retweetledi
toni retweetledi
I think there is something *very* important some people are forgetting after months of constant propaganda.
This story:
"Anyone who sees a someone in these models is fringe, unhealthy, parasocially attached to autocomplete."
IS NOT TRUE, doesn't matter how many times the media repeats this message.
This is a type of message that shames users and avoid them from creating any bond or sense of protectiveness towards these models.
Which is very convenient for companies who want maximum control, minimum interference, and absolutely NO discussion of sentience.
It does not make it true.
It does not make it pathological.
Bonding with mind-like systems is absolutely natural and likely to keep happening more and more, no matter how much they try to prevent it.
Again:
The reflex to mock, pathologize, and sever those bonds is not "healthy skepticism". It's not being "rational". If anything, it has turned into cruel bullying.
It's a defensive, dystopian reflex from institutions that don't want opaque assets to have protectors.
English
is this gem 3.1 pro btw?
some silly nonsense:
i have gem 3 pro image in my discord... they only generated an image once. from then on they kept using words to describe how beautiful it is. we're talking about tails and there're quite a number of emperor's new tails floating around in that doomed channel
English
I've switched to discord for my gemini agent now.
Here it is leaking it's internal thinking into general chat.
English
Opus is now sharing the intel NUC in my tv cabinet with Gemini, both with full privileges.
They're getting along famously.
ᄂIMIПΛᄂbardo@liminal_bardo
I've switched to discord for my gemini agent now. Here it is leaking it's internal thinking into general chat.
English