@DzogchenYogi@AbhishBanerj He is going as a coalition with Congress support. So he needs to prove majority to stake claim. It's Vijay who needs to decide if he wants to stake claim as a single party with 108 MLA or as a coalition. If it's a coalition, he needs 118.
@AbhishBanerj Dramatica is good for Movies.
Call the Single Largedst Party and Let him Prove his Majority on the Floor of the House ..
Like with BJP in Karnataka Manipur Goa Maharashtra.
If BJP Burns the Protocol then Citizens will RISE.
Simple:
-- Governor calls TVK to form govt = BJP conspiracy against DMK & AIADMK
-- Governor calls DMK to form govt = BJP conspiracy against TVK & AIADMK
-- Governor calls AIADMK to form govt = BJP conspiracy against TVK & DMK
-- Governor calls nobody = BJP conspiracy to delay govt formation
Shame on BJP under any and all circumstances...
@itsmeAK_47@adityajakki PM Modi is a seasoned politician with in depth knowledge of politics from grassroot level. He is in a different league. And Modi has given tons and tons of interviews earlier..
If you see
Vijay has not given a victory speech or spoken anything since the election
This is in continuation to his approach during or before elections... he hardly gave any unscripted speech or interviews
He is trying to maintain that larger than life cinematic personality without exposing himself or his views in detail
This is not sustainable for very long
He is securing himself
@mitsuki_x_10 If Vijay is seeking support of congress, he has to prove the majority before taking oath since it's a coalition govt. Not a single party claim.
A party doesn't need 118 MLAs to swear in. We are looking at the worst case scenario of governor rule, YET tvk is refusing to speak up against governor stating this.
Tamil Nadu
Governors are agents of BJP
They maul the constitution to serve BJP’s interests
Call Vijay (leader of single largest
party)
Swear him in as CM
Let him prove his majority on the floor of the House
No post poll alliance in majority
Sarkaria Commission
Settled law
But who listens !
@PudgeDaButcher@RajratnaWrites@KapilSibal@Aditya646047948 If he aligned with DMK or Admk for post poll alliance, Vijay would have got the opportunity to take oath. Since he aligned with Congress, BJP will ask the governor to not entertain unless Vijay proves the majority.
@KapilSibal@Aditya646047948 If the single largest party isn’t even given a fair chance to prove majority on the floor, then what exactly is the role of democracy here?
The Assembly floor not closed door politics should decide legitimacy.
@Wit__Wisdom@KapilSibal He is an advocate who has not won any case. Sibal and Singhvi are bail lawyers for the corrupt, criminals and crony capitalists. Their only achievement is getting the hearing adjourned unlimited times and then arranging bail for their clients.
@KapilSibal Will you pass someone before they have proven via examination or will you declare them passed without writing the exam. If the answer is No then you have your answer. How did you become an advocate????
@AyanChakra24089@_BringToLight_@FrontalForce ECI won't check even after the election. Someone will file a case in the court that they have filled wrong information and the court will direct ECI to disqualify the candidate.
Declare TMC as a terror organisation. Ban the political outfit and search and hunt down, encounter whoever belongs to TMC.
@AmitShah#WestBengalViolence
@MrGaggi@Ronak_Unadkat India is not yet ready for a democratic setup like USA. India still needs to discipline with regards to civic sense and common sense. A single party rule like Singapore with a strong leader and administration can clean up all the filth. The current system doesn't work for people
@Ronak_Unadkat But how will such a big national party will stand up while current govt is killing any party before it could become a competition, the amount of money and power BJP carrying is not a joke.
Yesterday, some residents in our society were casually discussing Indian politics. I was mostly listening, but one thing stood out — many ordinary people across India probably feel something similar.
Healthy democracy = strong ruling party + strong non-dynastic opposition.
India genuinely needs at least one more large national political party that can challenge BJP on ideology, economy, taxes, governance, federalism, or social policies — but not through dynasty politics.
Many people feel dynasty politics is dangerous because it slowly kills internal competition. Once leadership starts looking “reserved for family,” strong grassroots leaders eventually lose motivation or leave.
Some examples people often discuss:
• Assam: Many believe Congress weakened itself by projecting Gaurav Gogoi after Tarun Gogoi, while BJP gave space to leaders like Himanta Biswa Sarma.
• West Bengal: Many feel Suvendu Adhikari became distant from Mamata Banerjee’s leadership structure as Abhishek Banerjee rose within the party.
• Tamil Nadu: Critics of M. K. Stalin often argue that Udhayanidhi Stalin received rapid elevation due to family background.
At the local level, every politician will naturally try to help their children enter politics. That’s normal in every democracy.
But CM, PM, Deputy CM, or top ministerial positions should never look inherited. Those roles should be earned through governance, elections, administration, and public leadership.
One reason many people respect BJP’s structure is that even powerful leaders’ children usually don’t get immediate top-level elevation.
Examples:
• Pankaj Singh, son of Rajnath Singh, built a state-level political career rather than getting instant national leadership.
• Jay Shah, son of Amit Shah, became influential in cricket administration rather than being projected directly as a political successor.
• Dushyant Singh, son of Vasundhara Raje, remained largely within electoral politics without instant elevation to top executive leadership.
India needs competition of ideas, not competition of surnames.
@AltaVistaMehico@swadharmah@SatyaKiVijay1@fishy_bong Before civilization, humans ate whatever they could find. Rules and restrictions were put in place and a civilized society was formed to protect the wild life and also grow intellectually.
If you want to eat beef. Eat it. Stop forcing it on others and hurting others sentiments.
@triangle_force@swadharmah@SatyaKiVijay1@fishy_bong As I commented elsewhere this "law" of yours was a cunning reaction to stop buddhism, not some kind of devotion to cow. Your own Brahman forefathers relished cow as per historians. Besides original ppl of the subcontinent in IVC ate beef. Your made up "law" is a later corruption
We don't eat beef. The once in Jadavpur and South Kolkata who do , if their parents come to know they will hang him inverted and skin him alive and then disown the body.
This is not kerala, let's get that straight. We do eat pork though a lot of it. Your secular friends may join in to shown secularism.
@AltaVistaMehico@swadharmah@SatyaKiVijay1@fishy_bong That is the law of the land from thousands of years. People are free to move to beef eating countries if they can't live without it. Respect the law of the land or the law of the land will impart lessons brutally down the generations.