Dr Gordon Hart

5.2K posts

Dr Gordon Hart banner
Dr Gordon Hart

Dr Gordon Hart

@triztrooper

Rocket Scientist. Innovation. Wild ideas. Saying exactly what you don't want to hear at exactly the right time in precisely the right way for decades.

Katılım Şubat 2020
329 Takip Edilen395 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
Not everyone wants to become a specialist in innovation, but sometimes you may need to solve a difficult problem with an elegant solution. If you must learn only one innovation technique, learn this one. amazon.com/dp/B0DKC23MDW
English
6
8
31
19.9K
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
@RGroisch75321 Lord Uriah Chetworth would very much like to build incredible technologies that will carry humankind to the four corners of the globe. Even as far as the North Pole itself.
English
1
0
1
103
To Inspire
To Inspire@RGroisch75321·
Does your character want to change the world?
English
3
0
3
128
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
How about a dragon, the last dragon in the world, who appears in an engineering textbook I wrote and acts as a metaphor for all the world's problems, that if banished, taking all the world's problems with it, humanity would no longer have problems to solve, anything to strive against and would fall into lethargy, indolence, boredom and a romanticisation of the past, having no songs of their own to sing and no tales of their own to tell?
English
0
0
1
49
Adam Fard
Adam Fard@AdamFard_·
if you stop to think about it, storytelling is everything, and we need to learn that asap sales = storytelling hiring = storytelling marketing = storytelling pitching = storytelling networking = storyteling
English
20
4
32
946
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
@BikerNerdAuthor Longest I ever managed, full on, tended to be less than 10 mins. In fact, if I hadn't won in the first minute or so, I'd be disappointed.
English
0
0
1
100
Tom Tinney
Tom Tinney@BikerNerdAuthor·
Writing question: If two experienced armored men (fantasy) were fighting with swords/maces/shields, etc, with no magical enhancements, how long would you believe they could fight before exhaustion made any further effort futile? Comment below.
English
48
1
33
15K
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
@AdamFard_ Crikey, I am just an engineer, so creative writing is not part of the toolset. However, I gave it a go, and did get quite a bit out of it. If anyone has ever wondered if you have a novel in you, I highly recommend that you give it a go. It's really quite rewarding.
English
0
0
2
38
Adam Fard
Adam Fard@AdamFard_·
be honest, what was the last thing you tried to do that was completely outside your comfort zone?
English
13
1
13
1.4K
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
Whenever I encounter a neuromorphic camera being demonstrated at a tech conference...
Dr Gordon Hart tweet media
English
0
0
1
186
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
For a year I've been puzzling over the consequences of a century old technology that continues to astonish me the more I learn about it. Did you know that you can make carbon neutral gasoline from scratch?
English
0
0
2
289
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
I didn't wear a watch for years, until I returned to academia and started presenting to rooms full of grads. To be pitch perfect and hit each mark precisely when I need to, I need a watch on my wrist. A fold of the arms, a discrete glance now and then at one's wrist, a quick calculation, and you can finish your presentation. Precisely. On. Time. And I'm afraid that a cheap plastic digital watch just doesn't match my suit.
English
0
0
1
430
Kayla Hicks 📚
Kayla Hicks 📚@klhicks912·
What made you want to become a writer?
English
139
7
109
7.1K
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
I just assumed that the Merovingian and Persephone were earlier incarnations that demonstrate the outcome if The One ultimately makes the choice demanded of him to return to the Matrix and save humanity. Compromise to realise mere meaningless survival, followed by years of mediocracy, bitterness and resentment salved by superficial lusts. But apparently not. Perhaps I saw an entirely different movie.
Dr Gordon Hart tweet media
English
1
0
1
80
Kalshi Culture
Kalshi Culture@Kalshi_Culture·
In The Matrix, Neo wasn’t actually the first “One.” In a deleted line, Cypher reveals he’s the sixth candidate — the previous five all died fighting Agents, believing they could win. Neo is the one who finally breaks that cycle.
English
157
345
8.4K
766.7K
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
I guess this arrived in my head because it explains Persephone's demand for a kiss - to experience what it might be like to be loved by a fully manifest One, who would happily destroy humanity for love.
Dr Gordon Hart tweet media
English
1
0
1
60
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
Ultimately, by sensibly waiting, we get to the plot of Fail Safe, with Henry Fonda, but in reverse. I still think I'm missing something, as there is no way nobody at all on such a production wouldn't have simply said at some point, why don't they just wait... Perhaps all out there in internetland can help me.
Dr Gordon Hart tweet media
English
0
0
1
49
David Gillie
David Gillie@gillie_david·
My wife was VERY upset by the ending!! <> I too was shocked they didn't portray the single nuke as an EMP decapitation prep strike that would have prevented a response, Except, supposedly our nukes are analog not digital. and Chicago made it more "personal" for TV drama. <>
English
1
0
2
38
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
A House Of Dynamite made absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Dr Gordon Hart tweet media
English
1
0
3
383
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
Unfortunately, for me it entirely broke the tension from the first few minutes of the problem presented to the characters. I found myself in the unfortunate position of simply repeating 'why not just wait 20 minutes?' throughout the drama. In fact, the nature of the attack almost definitely demonstrates that the attack must be a malfunction or a rogue element. After all, to legitimately attack in this manner - by giving the US all the time they require to marshal their resources in response - is surely the dumbest way to fight a nuclear war that their is? It ensures your own destruction. So, the launch must be inadvertent or an isolated incident. Why can no-one in the story see this? In fact, I was expecting to find out eventually why they couldn't just wait. Some intriguing and well foreshadowed twist that I had not noticed. I expect it still. I must have missed something, and feel dumber for it. Then the story just....stopped. So now I'm left trying to solve the problem. What is the smallest modification one could make to this story to logically introduce this ticking clock?
English
1
0
1
32
David Gillie
David Gillie@gillie_david·
Ahh, I get it. I agree & thought same thing. BUT I'm sure it was a dramatic element needed for a TV show in that Annie constantly stressing that critical time frame for an all-out nuclear war (which most all agree is the only kind that can happen between us and Russia). Mixed with the element of a Rogue or NKorean nuke, that really needs to be in a show also - (everyone does all out nuke wars) Mixing two elements, that were important to show, created that not making sense to us "overthinkers". I found it entertaining and thought provoking, far from "no sense whatsever" <>
English
1
0
1
32
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
I can appreciate that it may look that way if one hasn't attempted to progress new tech from its inception in the fundamental sciences all the way to a product development programme. I too thought it likely straightforward when I accepted the task. However, the risk management antibodies of the commercial world are a powerful and very necessary mechanism. To negotiate the midpoint of that journey is quite the conundrum.
English
0
0
0
31
Dr Gordon Hart
Dr Gordon Hart@triztrooper·
As one who does indeed work to invent that future, I appreciate the sentiment and agree that science fiction offers a strong motivation. However, I have one tiny nit pick. I do indeed attempt to marshal the efforts of thousands of engineers to invent my imagined future. However, the driving question is rarely 'why not?' Invention is almost always driven by the question why? Or, often more specifically, what problem are you solving? Reason being, when marshalling those engineers, the trick is not to encourage a few of them to put their foot on the accelerator, but to motivate them all to take their foot off the brake at the same time. If you ask, why not? I can guarantee someone in the audience will explain to you precisely why not. It often starts with the statement, Ah, yes, but... The question that drives invention is why?
English
0
0
9
305
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Science fiction is a tool for thinking about tech before it's available. Every time humanity has invented something new and significant, we've had to change our social order to adapt to our new powers. Always, it's taken us a little time to figure that out, to get a clear picture of the opportunities and hazards. Often we don't understand the full implications of what we can do until decades after we can do it. Science fiction helps us get a head start on that. Man's reach does not exceed his grasp. Instead, his grasp exceeds his imagination. The narrowest bridge between ourselves and our potential is not our wealth or our intelligence, but our dreams. Always, when we invent something new, it is because someone looked at the world, and instead of asking "why?" asked instead "why not?" Science fiction is that. I'm not a wealthy man. I can't recruit thousands of engineers to invent the future I see inside my head. But I can write them down, because engineers read. And little boys, who will be engineers when I am dead, they read, too. So do the little boys who will someday be wealthy enough to recruit and pay them to work together on something wonderful. When I was a boy, I read about a future among the stars... until the publishing industry was hijacked by people whose only dream was the envious desire to loot western civilization. And eventually I got tired of reading lectures about limited resources, and hubris, and solar panels, and windmills. Because I knew they were wrong. Humanity has never thrived by conserving, and economizing, and redistributing. Our path of evolution has always been to explore, to discover, to grow, to expand, and to conquer. There were still boys with dreams. Boys always have dreams. That's what boys are for. And I decided, eventually, that if I couldn't get published writing them, then to hell with publishers and gatekeepers and anyone who wanted me to ask permission to create. I'll do it myself. Whether others wish it or not. And I think I'm not the only one.
Andrew McCalip@andrewmccalip

I basically view all sci-fi as a technical roadmap for humanity

English
36
86
789
26.3K