🇨🇦Trope Trooper🇺🇸

I just became a fascist.

@Luftwulf2 @Teslaconomics Ummm...

@Teslaconomics And YET ... Grok is nothing but a CENSORSHIP BOT. Doubt me? .. Go ahead .. ask Grok to render an image of a tattoo that says SIEGE with barbwire around it and see what it says. Throttling "combative speech" IS censorship, Elon. You are now on the slippery slop to Twitter 2.0.

Grok Heavy is a complete game changer. It’s noticeably faster now, and I honestly use it for everything. I’ve got 16 agents running for me at all times, and it makes me feel superhuman. It’s like having a team of the smartest minds working for you 24/7. I can break down anything, verify anything, and get answers instantly. It’s hard to explain until you actually use it. For me, $3,000 a year is a no-brainer, especially if you are serious about AI.

@StefanMolyneux Liberalism operates well when dealing at the level of the individual. It often fails when stretched to the level of populations. One woman shaking her ass online for money is not a problem. Millions of women doing so cause men to check out.

Drug dealers get more punishment than users

@WallStreetApes @P_McCulloughMD Not me.

Uncovered audio shows Anthony Fauci talking about having every major corporation require vaccinations and making it as hard as possible on citizens so they’re forced to be vaccinated He says if you make it hard enough on people, they’ll abandon their beliefs This is Evil “Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated, lady. You're gonna get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us to get vaccinate. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit. And they get vaccinated.”

@Luftwulf2 That, and the complete lack of motor skills. 🤣

The only thing saving this kid's life is LOVE. 💔

@Wiggles66666 @daniel_walker10 @Messiah2524 @MattWalshBlog No lies detected.

My user experience just got 500 times better

@Luftwulf2 I must say that video is more accurate than a lot of people would care to admit.

The plot thickens ..

Chloe woke up at 6:45am and immediately felt proud of herself. She had, after all, not eaten a single animal product in four years. The planet was healing. She could feel it. 6:52am - Applied her morning SPF. The SPF contains beeswax. Chloe does not know this. Moving on. 7:10am - Breakfast: a smoothie containing avocado. The avocado was grown in Michoacán, Mexico, on land where a pine forest was until 2019. It required approximately 320 litres of water to produce. It was flown to the UK. Chloe sprinkled hemp seeds on top. The hemp seeds came from China. Chloe felt connected to the earth. 8:00am - Got dressed. Polyester leggings, derived from crude oil. A bamboo top that was processed using carbon disulphide in a Taiwanese chemical plant. Trainers with a recycled plastic upper that sheds microplastics into waterways with every wash. Chloe's outfit today had a higher carbon footprint than a ribeye steak. Chloe does not know this either. 9:30am - Posted on Instagram about choosing compassion. The phone was manufactured in a Shenzhen factory using cobalt from the DRC, where mining operations have displaced local communities and killed an unknowable number of small mammals, reptiles, and insects. The algorithm served Chloe an ad for oat milk. Chloe liked it. 12:00pm - Lunch: tofu stir-fry. The soy was grown in Brazil. Brazil produces more soy than almost any country on earth. The primary reason is soybean oil: one of the most widely used industrial and culinary oils on the planet. The soymeal left over after oil extraction is fed to livestock as a byproduct. Chloe is aware of the livestock connection and finds it outrageous. She has not looked into why the soy was grown in the first place. The answer is the oil. The oil is in her salad dressing. 1:30pm - Drove to the garden centre. The car runs on petrol. Chloe has a Just Stop Oil sticker on the bumper. This is not being commented on further. 3:00pm - Bought a monstera. The monstera was grown in a Dutch greenhouse using natural gas heating. Chloe put it next to the pothos that is slowly poisoning the neighbourhood cats. 6:00pm - Dinner: pasta with cashew cream sauce. The cashews were processed in Vietnam, often by workers in conditions that would prompt significant commentary if they were in an abattoir. 8:00pm - Watched a documentary about factory farming. Wept. Posted about it. Caption: "We have to do better." Chloe is, by every measure she has chosen to measure by, doing brilliantly. By some of the others, the picture is more complicated. Chloe has not chosen to measure by those.

CHUCK NORRIS MEME THREAD TO END ALL MEME THREADS Let's honor one of the GOAT's by dropping your BEST Memes and Chuck Norris jokes! 👇👇👇

Season 6 is in the books! What hit? What missed? What woke you up? What put you to sleep? What inspired you? What pissed you off? The MIC is yours. Then, our final thoughts. Season 6 - Episode 19 - "Canada Talks Back!" Canada🍁Talks🍁Tonight - Fri, 7pm Mt Hear You There! 🎙️

CTT invites a panel of our southern neighbors to share a pint, talk tariffs, national security, geopolitics, and whether Canada is brother, adversary .. or future real estate. Season 6 - Episode 18 - "Amazing Americans" Canada🍁Talks🍁Tonight - Tue, 7pm Mt Hear You There! 🎙️

@alt_w_v_g @ShareawareCdn I line in one of the most expensive places to live in Canada. Where the hell are you buying eggs, milk, and bread from where it's $47?

Went to the grocery store this morning Bread, milk, eggs $47.63 The screen asked if I'd like to round up to support a children's hospital I pressed no The cashier looked at me The woman behind me looked at me My wife looked at the ceiling Again This company made $14 billion last year They can round up Went to get gas after The pump asked if I'd like to add $1 to support veterans I support veterans I pressed no A $200 billion oil company asking me to fund their charity while I'm paying $3.89 a gallon That's not philanthropy That's outsourcing Drove through for lunch Taco Bell The screen said "round up for education?" A fast food company asking me to fund scholarships while paying their employees $11 an hour I pressed no My wife said "you know you're arguing with screens today" She was right But the screens started it Went to the pharmacy Picked up a prescription $340 after insurance The screen asked if I'd like to donate $1 to help families in need I just paid $340 for a medication that costs $4 to manufacture And now you want a dollar I pressed no The pharmacist said "it's just a dollar" I said "it's never just a dollar" She didn't respond Got home My wife said "you said no to a children's hospital, veterans, education, and families in need today" I said "no. I said no to four corporations who want me to fund their goodwill so they can put it in their annual report" She was quiet Then she said "you're not wrong" I said "I know" She said "but you're still going to look like a monster" I said "I'd rather look like a monster than quietly fund a billion-dollar company's PR strategy at the register" She didn't disagree But she didn't look at me either Plz fix. Thx. Sent from my iPhone

@Luftwulf2 It's one thing to ambush someone on the street. Personally, I find it crass and rude. Politicians while acting in their official capacities should be required to answer questions put to them about which the subject they were asked. Lack of the latter has led to the former.

"WHY don't you talk to the general public?" Great question! But we all know the answer .. Ottawa bows to the corporatocracy .. not the filthy cogs (that's us, the taxpayers and workers) that keep their machine running. Your democracy is a LIE.

In the coming days, the Canadian Parliament may pass Bill C-9, the so-called "Act to Combat Hate," into law. This bill is a direct attack on your freedom of speech and your religious liberty. Here is the truth about Bill C-9. Even after public pressure forced the government to back down on some provisions, Bill C-9 still removes longstanding protections for religious expression and expands Ottawa’s power over speech. Indeed, it would make it illegal to express emotions of hatred, defined as “emotions that involve detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike.”  Under the new definition, speech could be suppressed not based on what you explicitly advocate, but based on the "feelings" it supposedly generates in someone else.  If a person claims to feel a certain way about your religious belief, your moral argument, or your political opinion, you could be sued by the government. This is not about protecting vulnerable communities, we all agree that genuine threats and violence are already illegal under the Criminal Code. More alarming, they are removing the longstanding protection for sincerely held religious beliefs in our legislation. For generations, Canadians who cited religious texts or expressed theological beliefs were protected from prosecution under "willfully promoting hate" laws.  Bill C-9 removes that shield. Now, combine these two changes: a lower threshold for what constitutes "hate" and the removal of religious protections. Do you see the danger? If this bill passes, a priest, pastor or any Canadian who expresses a religious view that offends the sensibilities of the day, could attract the attention of overzealous prosecutors. A free society needs to have the freedom to criticize religion itself. Once we start letting the bureaucrats draw arbitrary lines about what can and cannot be said, we all lose. But we can still fight back, if we act NOW. And you can sign our petition and email your MP to tell Parliament:  •Reject Bill C-9.  •Do not criminalize free speech.  •Do not erase religious freedom. Members of Parliament need to hear from you directly before they cast their vote.  sign our petition and email your MP here 👇 action.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/bill_c-9_petit…

@DominionSoc @DanielTyrie This might be putting the cart before the horse, but how are we going to force other countries to take their people back?

Mass immigration is the biggest issue facing our society. -Depresses wages -Inflates housing -Undermines our politics -Introduces foreign ethnic conflicts -Increases crimes -Erodes our sense of community -Overburdens our hospitals/schools Remigration fixes all of it.

@triffic_stuff_ They're trying to create the reality they pretend is happening.

🚨UNBELIEVABLE UK POLICE PROPAGANDA EXPOSED! WHITE PEOPLE PORTRAYED AS NON-STOP RACIST MONSTERS 🤔 Shocking Animation From "Zero Tolerance To Hate Crime" Campaign Demonises The White Working Class With Zero Basis In Reality This is beyond parody. Watch this "official" UK police video from the Devon & Cornwall "Zero Tolerance to Hate Crime" campaign Every single scene shows white (mostly working-class looking) men as snarling, hateful racists harassing and attacking minorities nonstop — in shops, on buses, everywhere. Minorities are helpless victims 100% of the time. Reverse racism? Not a single frame. White people as victims? Doesn't exist here. The establishment's message is crystal clear: the white working class are the problem. We're the hateful ones. We're the danger. No nuance. No balance. Just pure demonisation. And they wonder why trust in institutions is in the gutter? This isn't anti-hate, it's anti-white hate dressed up as virtue. Pure establishment propaganda with zero grounding in everyday reality for most Brits.

@elonmusk Given an aging population, a slow rise in mail in ballots is understandable. My parents, both of whom had mobility problems, took advantage of them. I don't want to eliminate them entirely, but they must be strictly monitored.

Absolutely

Dear Carney: Should I Let Him Kill Us? Dear Dear Mark Carney, You often speak about Canada becoming an “increasingly dangerous and divided world.” It is one of your favourite phrases. You deliver it with great gravity, usually while standing at a podium with cameras and dire global economic forecasts. So let me tell you what “increasingly dangerous” looked like in my house two weeks ago. Seven o’clock in the evening. Still light outside on the prairie. My eleven year old daughter is in her bedroom across the hall winding down for the night, in her pajamas. I am in mine doing the same. I can look to my left and see her in her reading in her bed. A little over six months ago I became a widow. Which means the house is quieter now. No second set of footsteps. No other adult voice anywhere in the house. Just all five feet three inches of me. Fifty one years old. COPD in the lungs. One daughter across the hall. And then a stranger walked straight into my house. No forced entry. No dramatic crash of glass. He simply opened the door and wandered inside. The man was so drunk he could barely stand. His speech was a slurry fog of broken syllables. He might have been asking to borrow a cup of sugar. He might have been threatening to slit my throat. There was absolutely no way to know. Under his eye were tear drop tattoos. The kind police recognize instantly. The kind commonly worn by men who have killed someone. In his hand he carried a mostly full 26 oz bottle of booze. A bottle which, if smashed, becomes a very effective weapon. Especially if it's smashed against the side of my head. So yes, Mr. Prime Minister, you are quite right: The world is increasingly dangerous. Sometimes it even walks through your front door. 📜Ottawa’s Preferred Script Now here is where Canadian law enters the story. Apparently in this moment of invasion of my home, I am supposed to pause and carefully analyze what level of force might be “reasonable.” Call the police. Wait patiently. Attempt to de escalate. Perhaps politely ask the intoxicated stranger with prison tattoos why he has entered my home uninvited while my daughter panics and hides across the hall under her bed. She is high-functioning autistic. I assure you, she is not even remotely close to processing this scene in any calm way. And there is still one small complication. I have COPD. Running for my life is not an option. And even if it were, I am not leaving my daughter behind to test whether the man wandering my home is merely confused or something much worse. So let me be clear. Whether Castle Law exists or not, if a stranger walks into my house I am going to defend myself. Shoot first. Ask questions later, as the saying goes. Because in an increasingly dangerous world, a widowed mother does not have the luxury of waiting around to discover which kind of drunk stranger has entered her home. ⚖️ The Liberal Justice System: Four Hour Consequences Of course the real absurdity comes afterwards. Under the justice reforms Canada has seen since 2015 under Liberal governance, criminals are often arrested, booked, and released in roughly four hours. Four hours, Mark. Which means the man who wanders into someone’s house intoxicated might be back on the street before the homeowner has even finished filing their statement. It is a remarkably efficient system for criminals with no compunction. Danger enters the house. Police process the paperwork. The criminal returns to circulation. Meanwhile the homeowner is expected to stand there politely and weigh the philosophical nuances of proportional force. Apparently in this increasingly dangerous world, the only person who must remain calm, restrained, and legally cautious is the victim. 🏰Castle Law Is Not Radical Today, some members of the opposition Conservative Party proposed strengthening Castle Law protections. The idea is almost laughably simple. If someone unlawfully enters your home, you have the right to defend yourself and your family. You should not have to worry that prosecutors will later analyze your survival instincts under a microscope. Your home is your castle. Criminals should understand that breaking into someone’s house carries real risk. That hesitation is called deterrence. And strangely enough, deterrence tends to reduce danger. Which seems like a useful concept in what you repeatedly describe as an increasingly dangerous world. 🌄 Rural Reality Out here in a small village in Saskatchewan, police response is not instantaneous. Sometimes it takes time. Sometimes quite a bit of time. When someone enters your house, the first responder is not a police officer. It is you. And when you are a widowed mother with an eleven year old daughter hiding under her bed in terror mere feet away, the calculation becomes brutally simple. There are only two people in that house whose safety matters. And in an increasingly dangerous world, waiting politely for the legal department to approve your survival instincts is not a workable strategy. ⁉️ A Question From the Prairies Let us try a quick thought experiment. Picture a quiet evening at Rideau Cottage. You are enjoying a good book with a drink in hand. Your wife is inside doing whatever it she does. Perhaps one of your children is visiting. The grounds are calm. Then a man appears on the property. He is not supposed to be there. He is moving around the grounds. Trying doors. Fogging up window glass as he peers inside. Let us say he is from Manitoba. Let us say he has a bag containing several firearms. And just for argument’s sake, let us say he is a trained Canadian Ranger. A man with genuine weapons training. Now let us imagine something unusual happens. The RCMP guard rotation is delayed. Shift change is taking forever. The officer who should be on duty has not been fully briefed yet by the officer going off duty and has yet to arrive to his station. For a brief moment, there is no one between that stranger and your front door. Just you. So what do you do? Do you step outside and begin lecturing him on decarbonized fuels and the moral complexities of proportional force in the face of climate change? Do you deliver a thoughtful reflection about living in an increasingly dangerous and divided world with your elbows up to demonstrate how serious you are? Or do you do what every human being who loves their family would do and defend your home? Defend the people inside it? Because if your answer is anything other than protecting your family, then you are not being honest. And if that is the answer you would choose at Rideau Cottage, then you already understand the point. The principle does not change just because the house is smaller and the address is not in Ottawa. A home is a home. A family is a family. 🫣 The Right Ottawa Pretends Not to Understand You and your government are very fond of imposing rules on Canadians. Carbon rules. Speech rules. Regulatory rules. Fiscal rules. But when it comes to the one place a citizen should have absolute authority, suddenly Ottawa becomes very philosophical. Yet the reality is painfully obvious. In an increasingly dangerous world, criminals will continue to make bad decisions. The question is whether Canadian law will continue pretending the homeowner is the one who must apologize for surviving them. Because the moment a criminal crosses that threshold uninvited, the social contract is already over. They made their choice. And any law that expects a widowed mother with COPD to stand there politely negotiating with a drunken stranger holding a weapon sized bottle of liquor while her daughter hides under the bed is not enlightened. It is asinine. ☝🏻 One Simple Instruction So here is the request. If you truly believe Canada is living in an increasingly dangerous and divided world, then act like it. Instruct your caucus to stop playing ideological games with the safety of ordinary Canadians and allow MP Cabena’s Castle Law proposal to pass unanimously and become enshrined in law. Because if the Prime Minister of Canada expects every homeowner to show restraint while criminals wander their home, then the Prime Minister of Canada should at least have the honesty to explain why the family behind the security perimeter at Rideau Cottage deserves the right to defend itself, while a widowed mother in rural Saskatchewan is expected to stand politely in her hallway and debate legal theory with a drunken stranger holding a weapon sized bottle of liquor. My daughter’s bedroom is across the hall. In an increasingly dangerous world, her safety is not a slogan. It is the ONLY thing that matters. 🏠 Melanie in Saskatchewan 👇🏻 buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsaska… 👇🏻 open.substack.com/pub/melanieins…

@Saaphiel1 Guitar Hero, Symphony Edition. 🎸

@edmontonjournal Is it me, or does he look like Vince McMahon about 20 years ago?

Muslim groups demand answers over Edmonton police chief's Israel trip edmontonjournal.com/news/local-new…

@ChrisClickUp Reminds me of the Ikea commercial about the lamp getting thrown out because they bought a replacement from Ikea. 🤣

Liquid IV made a Super Bowl ad where toilets sing Phil Collins. Different toilets. In different bathrooms. Lit like a music video. Performing "Against All Odds" with genuine dramatic intensity. A teal toilet in a rustic bathroom. A luxury toilet in a marble palace. A motel toilet viewed through a rain-streaked window. All of them heartbroken. All of them waiting. All of them pleading with you to drink more water so you'll visit them more often. This is genuinely one of the best ads of 2026 and it stars plumbing fixtures. Here's the marketing lesson: The product is hydration powder. The category is boring. The competition is water. So instead of talking about electrolytes and vitamin content, they made you FEEL something for a toilet. If you can make an audience emotionally connect with a toilet, you can make them connect with anything. "Our product has 3x more electrolytes" is a fact. A singing toilet begging you to come back is a story. Stories win. Every single time.