tumbleweedblows

@indio007 @kacper132m Pictures in the globe. 100% consistent with globe geometry. Feel free to show any inconsistency.

@kacper132m then what's this?

@Andy_K333 @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara Consistent with globe geometry, and contradicting any flat earth, as I explained. Do you agree? If not, why not?

@tumbleweedblows @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara The horizon is a straight line. That's all you will ever see.

地球がフラットである事を 受け入れられない人がいるらしい それはその人の問題なんだなぁ🙂‍↔️

@Andy_K333 @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara The degree to which it appears straight is consistent with and predicted by globe geometry. The existence of a horizon of any shape contradicts flat earth entirely. A crisp horizon without curvature is simply impossible. There is no coherent explanation.

@tumbleweedblows @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara It doesn't appear to be straight, it is straight.

@Andy_K333 @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara I just explained why the horizon appears to be a straight line. Do you have any questions about this? What does “end of” mean?

@tumbleweedblows @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara That's a highlighted straight line. End of.

@darkagenda @DanielB59756947 @Not_yourpilot Confused about “down”?

@DanielB59756947 @Not_yourpilot this is the diagram he made for me earlier today. As you can see the plane goes upside down.

#flatearth fail

@Dems4TrumpVance @Jay_Anaiya @MayUlive2C You believe in the “chemtrails” fantasy. I don’t. What problem are you referring to? Please be specific.

@tumbleweedblows @Jay_Anaiya @MayUlive2C So deal with your problem, midwit.

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (AKA Chemtrails) in the UK? They claim it's just water vapour due to colder air temperatures. I recorded this on one of the warmest days of the year, the Sun near its zenith; the temperature rising. I guess it's not the air temperature after all

@Jay_Anaiya @Dems4TrumpVance @MayUlive2C The government is not a person. It does not have feelings. It does not care if you believe silliness like “chemtrails” or not. One cannot come to believe in “chemtrails” through any rational thought process. Recognizing you have a problem is the first step in solving it.

@tumbleweedblows @Dems4TrumpVance @MayUlive2C I said the government has contempt for us, not you. And you're helping... By calling us mentally ill.... Right. Is this a new strategy you came up with on your own? Or did you pick it up from someone else?

@IvanIljkic @digijordan ISS on the other hand is spinning, once every 90 minutes. So I’m guessing that photo probably was taken with @astro_Pettit’s tracker, which is basically a motor that turns once every 90 mins. There’s probably a better video than this… youtube.com/shorts/GFwG1DH…

@tumbleweedblows @digijordan Seems reasonable

When I questioned why none of the Artemis photos showed stars…hundreds of triggered NPCs screamed at me…saying it was impossible to do…I’d proceed to tell them it’s actually quite easy and basic…they’d call me names and come completely unhinged. But now we see this beautiful photo from a NASA astronaut…with a VERY bright earth AND the Milky Way. Obviously these types of shots are not only possible…they’d are easy and should be expected. Now…the question is…why the lack of videos… And WHY are most the Artemis photos devoid of stars?

@IvanIljkic @digijordan The Hello World shot was taken in 1/4 second with 52,000 ISO. The speed of the craft is virtually irrelevant at the distances involved. Orion was not spinning. It was travelling away from earth.

@tumbleweedblows @digijordan Long exposure doesnt work while they are allegedly moving through space at such speeds. If it does, enlighten me please.

@Andy_K333 @ok_libtardz @1000000aobara The horizon is not a straight line and it does not curve down. It curves around you.

@ok_libtardz @1000000aobara Why is the horizon highlighted with a straight line if you live on a ball?

@BGatesIsaPyscho “Best” is subjective. If you think it’s the best, then yes, so what? What exactly should they have done that they did not do? Is your suggestion feasible?

So let me get this straight…. NASA just flew around the Moon for the first time in over 50 years, and the best footage they got from the entire 10 Day trip, was 30 seconds worth record recorded on an iPhone? Got it 👍

@Jay_Anaiya @Dems4TrumpVance @MayUlive2C It’s not plausible with or without research, and I don’t have contempt for people with mental illness. I’m here to help.

@tumbleweedblows @Dems4TrumpVance @MayUlive2C Come on man, you didn't need to go there.. It's just a narrative that's easy to believe is plausible without doing a ton of research based on the fact our governments have a staggering contempt for us and lie more than breathing. Calling it a mental illness is harsh.

@thinktankfranks @DisrespectedThe If you saw an aircraft leaving a trail at 1000 feet you were probably at an air show, and the plane was releasing aerobatic smoke oil for the performance, or you were in a forest fire. There are other possibilities but those are the most likely. Feel free to show your photos/data

@tumbleweedblows @DisrespectedThe Does water vapor condense into ice crystals at 1,000 feet? That’s my point. They don’t. And I’ve seen trails directly above me behind planes that are extremely low altitude. And have cross referenced them on ADB exchange to check altitude of the specific plane. It’s not possible.

Contrails my ass.

@Zetterower777 @DisrespectedThe The appearance and persistence of contrails depends on the temperature, pressure and humidity of the surrounding air. And it can be predicted from weather balloon data that collects this information at altitude.

@DisrespectedThe Contrails dissipate quickly, chem trails don't.

@thinktankfranks @DisrespectedThe Nothing you’re saying makes any scientific sense. Contrails are not formed from ice crystals. They are ice crystals. They’re formed when water vapour condenses into ice crystals. No jet is flying over you at 1000 feet leaving a contrail. A trail above you can be any altitude.

Feel like I have to hit people over the head with this stuff, it’s basic science. Contrails are formed from ice crystals in the atmosphere. Those ice crystals form at 30,000 feet. They don’t form at 1,000 feet. So next time you see a trail directly above you, know that it’s quite literally NOT a contrail, as that would be scientifically impossible.

@IMJohnMarsriver @Astro_ChrisW Yes, this is also a real photograph. Incredulity notwithstanding.

@tumbleweedblows @Astro_ChrisW Oh like this night pic? Get real dude they are all fake pictures! Nobody knows what Earth looks like from Space. Satellites are ET tech. But at least they both show the Honmoon.

One question I get a lot is can you see the stars differently from up in space. When we orbit on the night side of the planet, we get a view of the stars very much like being in a very dark place on Earth. And because of our orbital inclination, we get to see the stars of both the northern and southern hemisphere. I captured this shot of our galactic plane from one of the windows of the Crew Dragon Freedom that is docked to the zenith docking port.

@_orbro @Astro_ChrisW Your wish came true. It’s real.

@Astro_ChrisW i wish this were real

@genestad @Astro_ChrisW The earth in this photo is night. It appears very bright due to the long exposure. It would not look like this to the eye.

@Astro_ChrisW I'm going to ask a dumb question - is that what your eyes "see" or is this a result of camera settings allowing for capturing more light than what a person would typically experience just looking out a window?

@IMJohnMarsriver @Astro_ChrisW The same long exposure needed to expose stars also brightens the small amount of light on the night side of earth (light primarily from stars and reflecting off the moon from the sun).

@Astro_ChrisW Now I gotta ask the reverse question, if that’s the night side of Earth, why is it so lit up? And… look at the yellow Honmoon glazing Earth! How awesome is that?