Niboshi Ramentalist

My amendment passed! Pesticide liability protections have been stripped from the farm bill. 🔥⚔️🔥

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: JP Morgan executive is being accused of turning an married Indian man that she hired into her personal sex slave that she drugged, forced to have intercorse with her while making him take viagra as she threatened to take his job from him if he didn’t comply. When the alleged victim said no, she allegedly told him: "If you don't f*k me soon, I'm going to ruin you. Never forget, I f*king own you." Additional alleged remarks: "You really think management wants some Indian boy leading organizations?" “If you don’t have sex with me tonight, I’m going to sabotage your promotion.” “I bet your little Asian fish-head wife doesn’t have these cannons.” If these allegations are true they should be met with the same scrutiny as if the roles were reversed.

I've been in Japan for almost a week and I'm sitting in a busy cafe and this is the first time I've heard someone playing their phone out loud. And of course it is a tourist. I truly wish they'd boot her out of the country.

ChatGPT is a dangerous AI, I have zero trust that it is set to seek truth and protect humans I do not use it, I found Grok ❤️

We are so close to the first customer Cybercab ride⚡️🤯 Can't wait for this moment

🚨 Musk vs OpenAI's lawyer — the cross-examination exchanges William Savitt — Wachtell Lipton's lead defense lawyer, Supreme Court clerk, trained to break witnesses. Savitt opens with a misleading premise. Musk: "You're being misleading. What you're saying is false." Savitt tries again with a different loaded frame. Musk: "Your questions are not simple. They are designed to trick me." Savitt demands a yes or no answer to a complicated question. Musk: "If you ask a question where there is no possible simple answer, I must give a longer answer because any simple answer would be misleading the jury." Musk reaches for an analogy: "The classic answer to a yes or no question is not so simple. For example, if you ask the question 'will you stop beating your wife?'..." Judge Gonzalez Rogers cuts him off: "No, we're not gonna go there." The courtroom laughs. Savitt apologizes for the question. Musk: "I find it funny you saying it wasn't an unfair question since you're only asking unfair questions." Savitt: "I'm doing my best." Musk: "That is not true." OpenAI's lawyer came to break Musk. Musk wasn't having it.

HYPE has devils hiding in the details: Co-located low node count, off-chain ordering & it is closed source! Yet, dismissing it as "centralized" is foolish, as its core design is decentralized! HYPE is decentralizing more, racing SOL to win. Pay attention or get left behind: 🧵 The reason why HYPE has been so successful, leading the charts in fees, is that their product is superior to everyone else's, including SOL's! SOL's leadership is well aware of this & its future upgrades, Alpenglow & MCP, are meant to close that gap In the meantime, HYPE has been running unopposed within its particular niche, which includes Perp trading & RWA's! The Latency Race: HYPE currently only has 24 validators, most of which are located in the same data center in Tokyo. This is an extreme degree of centralization! Despite the validators themselves still being permissionless This happened because of the high demand for low latency. We will not defend this design; however, we do still have to recognize the market demand for lower latency It gets exciting when we realize that both SOL & HYPE want to achieve such low latency within a fully decentralized design environment. It then becomes a question of who gets there first! Fake It Till You Make It: The truth behind HYPE is that people are not trading on-chain at all. Their orders are getting matched in the mem-pool & are only included on-chain later Most people cannot tell the difference; that is how HYPE managed to offer a superior product. They took shortcuts others were unwilling to make. Which, honestly, can also be said for SOL during the early days However, contrary to my own expectations. As I was a SOL critic at that time. SOL fixed all of its issues & managed to take the lead in usage. Convincing me in the end to pivot & support the project HYPE is also saying & doing all of the right things, giving us a clear path towards full decentralization in its future The Prize: Make no mistake, whoever wins this race wins the entire crypto game! The use cases these chains cover collect the vast majority of fees. Which is what ultimately pays for decentralization, security & scarcity That means, from an evolutionary perspective, whoever comes out on top of this competition. Becomes "Bitcoin 3.0"; the most decentralized & performant chain The blockchain trilemma was effectively solved years ago. The trade-off space now entirely revolves around latency instead Trillion Dollar Questions: Will SOL close the gap before HYPE fixes all of its problems? Or will HYPE decentralize before SOL catches up? These are the trillion-dollar questions HYPE is committing to open-sourcing the codebase & moving trading fully on-chain. While increasing & better distributing their validators globally Do we bet on the more decentralized chain, which is catching up in performance? Or do we bet on the more performant chain, which is catching up on decentralization? Or maybe it comes down to which team we trust more to get us across the finish line first. Or what technical challenges are harder or easier to overcome? It is a combination of all of these factors that will determine the ultimate winner Conclusion All that matters in the end is that we, the people, get a fully permissionless, decentralized & performant chain at scale. How we get there matters far less in the grand scheme of things The crypto revolution is inevitable exactly because of the type of utility SOL & HYPE offer the world. Building competitive products for mass adoption is the only way we can make a real impact That is why this should all matter more to the cypherpunk movement, as only highly performant & decentralized chains can liberate the world. By making financial sovereignty & privacy available to all! 🔥

I’m very happy about this. Iran has suffered greatly under sanctions. It’s time Pakistan helps them regain economically.

Alex Clark: "We are asking one simple question: Why does Bayer deserve protection but American families and farmers don’t? A country that can’t protect its children from corporate poison is not a free country, it’s a captured one."

FSD v14.3.2 has been driving me all over LA tonight. This build is f-ing incredible, smooth as butter and it’s fascinating how well it can handle complex traffic scenarios, road closures and tight roads. Best FSD build ever, holy shit. Tesla cooked here.

Bill Maher fires back at Billie Eilish and leftist “kids” who “don’t know what the f*ck” America is about. “I want to… say something about Western civilization. Kids, you don’t know what the f*ck it is.” “They think Western means white—and white means bad. First of all, everything bad that white people did, people of color did it, too. The Japanese before World War II and during World War II. And Genghis Khan, and I could go on and on.” “The left is very down on America, very down on the West. And it’s ironic because the West has also given us everything that makes your life good here. Don’t ask Billie Eilish or Chappell Roan about what the Western values are, because they’ll just say it’s about oppression.” “But it’s not about oppression. It’s about rule of law. It’s about respect for minorities. It’s about democracy. It’s about scientific inquiry. These are all good things that came from the Western world. I wish that schools would teach that again.”

⚠️ NEW BITCOIN FORK PROPOSES REDISTRIBUTING SATOSHI’S COINS Long-time Bitcoin developer, Paul Sztorc, is proposing a fork that would reassign part of Satoshi Nakamoto’s ~1.1M . The plan is to copy Bitcoin into a new chain called eCash with native eCash tokens. “Hold 4.19 BTC at the time of the fork, get 4.19 eCash. You can sell it, keep it, or ignore it entirely,” he said on X. However, certain wallets (like Satoshi’s) would be flagged as “inactive,” and their balances would be redistributed under the new rules. Supporters argue this could “revive lost coins” and make supply more usable. Critics call it outright theft, warning it sets a dangerous precedent for rewriting ownership.