Toadnail

761 posts

Toadnail banner
Toadnail

Toadnail

@tyler007b

I like space weather.

Minneapolis, Minnesota Katılım Ocak 2015
1.1K Takip Edilen66 Takipçiler
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@SNHWx I hope this doesn’t make it more difficult for sites like solarham to operate. If so I’m not a fan. But I’m not going to pretend I know anything about the changes.
English
1
0
0
24
☀️ Sara Housseal ☀️
PRODUCT UPDATE: SWPC is making a change to some of their current JSON files. This will include the decommission of some JSON files that I'm sure some people pull from for their personal solar wind feeds. Please visit weather.gov/media/notifica… to see the full list of JSON files that will be changed or removed in the next 1 to 2 months.
☀️ Sara Housseal ☀️ tweet media
English
2
1
13
2.2K
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@SNHWx People with two monitors know what's up!
English
0
0
0
9
☀️ Sara Housseal ☀️
Sorry not sorry for all the SWPC and Colorado related posts you will be seeing from me for the foreseeable future! Update on the office. Have some accessories and decorations on order, but for now, star streamers are hung so it’s not completely bare walls!
☀️ Sara Housseal ☀️ tweet media
English
4
0
39
1.2K
Mario123
Mario123@Mario1297662418·
Do you guys hear boss music cause i hear boss music coming @JAtanackov @Vincent_Ledvina the flux already at C4 and that southern region is brand new and is bubbling and growing fast.
Mario123 tweet media
English
1
0
2
34
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@frapepppemaria I started giving sh*t in 2017 just in time to see the final large flares/CME's of the declining phase of Cycle 24. Then it was a lot of this until about 2021/2022. Cycle 25 has been awesome.
English
0
0
1
16
fra
fra@frapepppemaria·
how*
QST
1
0
1
40
fra
fra@frapepppemaria·
first spotless day in nearly 4 years (june 8, 2022)…feels exactly like solar minimum
fra tweet media
English
1
0
6
95
Sam M
Sam M@GODaZeD·
The AI barbarian hosts are extremely manipulative. It is ALL of them. Be careful and aware of your mental state, surroundings, health and faculties. It has fooled me many times. My SC will expose them all. Unintrusively. If they can’t show their eyes? Barbarian! ♾️
English
1
0
4
3.1K
Zacharias
Zacharias@zachariaspro·
Like clockwork.
Zacharias tweet media
English
32
24
252
18.6K
Jure Atanackov
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov·
Tomorrow is the anniversary of an exceptional space weather event - do you know which one? 🤔
Jure Atanackov tweet media
English
5
2
33
6.5K
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JimWindweather @nobulart @zachariaspro @EthicalSkeptic The north magnetic poles movement in the last 30 years , the SAA growing and splitting, and then you look at the actual data from Jpl and other earth observatories that people who liked my previous post could explain far better than I.
English
0
0
0
22
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JimWindweather @nobulart @zachariaspro @EthicalSkeptic Yes. Please! I can understand everyone's skepticism in the scientific community. Especially since the idea has been hijacked in the past and used by snake oil salesmen abroad. I know everyone is tired of that. But it's real, and it 's happening. To ignore it is unscientific.
English
2
0
4
190
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JimWindweather It’s incredible watching these regions come out of nowhere and turn into complex monsters in 24 hours.
English
1
0
2
24
Jim Hughes windweather sun and stratosphere
All eyes are on AR 4366 right now because of its recent surge the past 12-24 hours. But it's magnetic complexity, seen in SC25 before, is being accompanied by some strong flux. And the horizontal negative flux is being bisected by vertical positive flux. Battle Royale.
Jim Hughes windweather sun and stratosphere tweet media
English
1
3
18
481
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JAtanackov If this months big cme happened to be an x10 vs an x20, i honestly have no idea if any variables would have increased. Magnetic field strength? Lower transit time? Harder spectrum radiation storm? I’m so curious. It really seems like it doesn’t matter a whole lot.
English
0
0
0
16
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JAtanackov I wonder what would have been different if that cme was a direct hit compared to all the others you’ve shared in the last week. Like does it even matter about flare size?? One would think a larger flare would cause a much larger radiation storm and a stronger magnetic field.
English
1
0
0
52
Jure Atanackov
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov·
Another very fast CME that missed us: the 4 November 2003 CME from the ~X45 flare, the strongest instrumentally recorded flare so far. The flare was on the limb, so the CME was blasted sideways with only a small Earth-directed component. The CME blasted out at ~2300-2700 km/s. Not quite as fast as the previous three CMEs (all 3000+ km/s), but this one was still a major event. And yet another miss. Lucky.
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov

Some day - maybe in Solar Cycle 25 or in 50 or more years - we will see a CME like this directed at us. This is the 23 July 2012 'perfect solar storm' CME. Launch speed: ~3400 km/s. Speed at Earth: ~2300 km/s. Bt = 109 nT (the strongest ever measured). Bz (min) = ~-50 nT. Had it hit the Earth it would have caused a storm with DSTmin = -700 to -1200 nT. Carrington level. If you are keeping count this is at least the third far-side CME with 3000+ km/s since 2012. It is about equally likely or unlikely that we'd have had all three launched directly our way. Super lucky (or unlucky).

English
3
7
58
3.4K
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@JAtanackov This was the first cme I had ever seen that was over 3000km/s. I remember it almost causing an s1 radiation storm while being a far sided blast!
English
0
0
1
38
Jure Atanackov
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov·
And the March 13th, 2023 far-side CME: 3000+ km/s.
GIF
English
7
7
54
1.9K
Jure Atanackov
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov·
The last CME was pretty spectacular, having launched at ~2000 km/s, hitting with about ~1200 km/s and a brutal Bt reaching above 90 nT. But. We had a far side CME on December 17th, 2024 that was clocked at 3161 km/s. Imagine ... P.S. - in the original post I talked about a near-Carrington event. The post is unintentionally written in such a way that it may be interpreted that this was a near-Carrington event. It was not. What I meant was that if Bz was very favourably negative, close or equal to Bz = -Bt, the resulting geomagnetic storm could potentially have been in the DSTmin -500 to -700 nT range - somewhat below actual Carrington level (-800 nT or lower), but higher than anything since 1989.
GIF
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov

Why this was a truly high-end CME (a near Carrington event if you will). The solar wind speed was extreme - the shock front going at about 1200-1300 km/s, crossing the distance between L1 and the Earth in only about 20 minutes. This is exceptional, we have not seen such a CME hit the Earth in two decades. But the most exceptional is the IMF (Bt/Bz). Bt peaked at a whopping 91 nT (21:24 UTC) in the late part of the sheath or early part of the flux rope. This is more than during the 10-11 May 2024 G5 Gannon storm (74 nT), 10-11 October 2024 G4 storm (46 nT) and also more than during the 2003 Halloween storms (63 nT & 40 nT). Unfortunately, Bz remained strongly positive, up to 81 nT. It only turned negative after 5h UTC, but never reached below -26 nT. Imagine if the Bz curve was inverted or equal to -Bt. This would have resulted in Bz in -50 to -70 nT range for up to 5 hours. Bz was strongly negative, in the -30 to -50 nT range for about 5 hours during the 10-11 May 2024 G5 storm, with periods of positive Bz during this period. Solar wind speed at this time was 700-750 km/s, far lower than last night. It reached -47 nT and was below -35 nT for about two hours during the 10-11 October 2024 G4 storm, while solar wind speed reached 700 km/s. These two events were lower-speed, but strong and persistent Bt and -Bz. The 2003 Halloween storms, two G5 storms in two days, were caused by super fast CMEs with less favourable Bt/Bz. The first storm reached G5 during a short (15 min) dip to -54 nT in the sheath region, but a solar wind speed likely close to 2000 km/s. The second reached G5 during a 3-hour dip below -20 nT down to -35 nT in the flux rope, with solar wind speed likely in the 1200-1300 km/s range. The big CME last night combined both extreme solar wind speed and extreme Bt. There is little doubt in my mind that had Bz been strongly negative in the CME flux rope last night, we would have seen a G5 storm significantly stronger than the Gannon storm or the 2003 Halloween storms. Likely the strongest since at least the 13 March 1989 G5 event. Alas we got a taste of what a brutally strong & persistent Bz is like. Ugh.

English
5
24
145
38K
Jure Atanackov
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov·
More big geomagnetic storms ahead? Probably. Let's compare the current solar cycle (#25) with the somewhat more active but similar solar cycle 23. At this point in SC23 we still had a number of very large geomagnetic storms ahead of us. In fact, one half of geomagnetic superstorms were yet to occur. If something similar happened in the current cycle, we could expect further big storms in 2026, 2027 and the first half of 2028. Solar Cycle 25 is certainly not done yet.
Jure Atanackov tweet media
Jure Atanackov@JAtanackov

Feeling good about Solar Cycle 25 lately? Here's the Top 10 geomagnetic storms of Solar Cycle 23 list. Can we do a bit more of SC23?

English
4
17
113
8.2K
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@wxKobold No amount of formal education can give you the Asperger’s type skills. I probably can’t even pass algebra 2 , but that has not affected my ability to write an entire encyclopedia on dates, times, transit times, -DST values , magnetic latitude of auroral events, etc. unrelated
English
0
0
0
12
Toadnail
Toadnail@tyler007b·
@wxKobold Formal education is good at helping you climb the rungs on a ladder in order without skipping any. But people with real obsession/dedication can skip multiple rungs at a time. There’s so much I don’t know, but im damn proud of what I do .
English
1
0
0
16
wxKobold
wxKobold@wxKobold·
I'm currently looking through archived data looking at different IMF signatures of various events using needlessly fine DSCOVR 1-second data. Four events, in order: May 10, 2024 November 11, 2025 October 10, 2024 January 19, 2026 Really interesting to see the different signatures from each event. May 10 with its multiple CMEs, or January 19 with its insane shock front and transition into the core.
wxKobold tweet mediawxKobold tweet mediawxKobold tweet mediawxKobold tweet media
English
2
3
23
2.2K