Tyson

@dougcj37 @DreAllDay @aakashgupta @RealCandaceO You said most people hate the work they do. Who’s arguing that they need to stay in the same job forever? Also, what does your dad do now he’s retired? Does he just sit around all day? Or does he do something that gives him meaning and purpose?

@tysonzahner @DreAllDay @aakashgupta @RealCandaceO That’s my point.

The Daily Wire is the case study of why personality-driven media companies can't compound. Peak in late 2023: Shapiro's YouTube alone pulled 170M monthly views. Daily Wire+ subscriptions, a Nashville studio operation, Bentkey kids streaming, an e-commerce arm with razors and chocolates and cigars. The company was running a billion-dollar conservative Disney bet. Then they made the studio bet bigger. Pendragon Cycle, an Arthurian fantasy series of the kind that has bankrupted larger production houses. Bentkey trying to compete with Disney for kids' attention. Daily Wire+ chasing Netflix. Running a newsroom, a film studio, a children's streaming platform, and a private-label consumer goods business simultaneously requires either limitless capital or extraordinary discipline. Some of it worked. Matt Walsh's "Am I Racist?" was the top-grossing documentary of 2024. Most of it didn't. In March 2024, they parted ways with Candace Owens. She walked into the open market and built a show that competes with theirs. Today she has 5.5M YouTube subscribers and added 10.9M followers across platforms since January 2025, generating roughly 805M views in that window. Daily Wire converted its biggest distribution asset into its largest competitor. Early 2025, co-founder Jeremy Boreing stepped down as co-CEO and launched a solo podcast outside the company he co-founded. Bentkey was shuttered the same year. Entire team cut. Then the audience math hit Shapiro himself. 170M monthly YouTube views in late 2023 to roughly 22M in early 2026. An 85% collapse in 18 months. Another 60K subscribers gone in the last 90 days alone. Layoffhedge.com estimates cumulative workforce reduction above 60% over the past year. Tucker Carlson left Fox in 2023, kept his audience, runs his shop with a fraction of the headcount. Megyn Kelly's network drew 138M YouTube views in February alone. The personalities figured out they don't need the platform. The platform discovered the opposite. Daily Wire built a billion-dollar valuation on names that can walk, take the audience with them, and run a competing show from a laptop the next morning. 170M views to 22M. The company kept the overhead. The audience left with the people.

@dougcj37 @DreAllDay @aakashgupta @RealCandaceO and the story of your father is not also anecdotal?

@tysonzahner @DreAllDay @aakashgupta @RealCandaceO Ancidotal, my Father retired and has never been happier. Most people hate the work they do.

You clearly didn’t even understand his take on retirement. He never argued that you should stay in a job you hate. The point is that when you stop working and just sit around, you lose purpose and become bored. I saw this with my own father in law. He was retired for a couple months and couldn’t stand the boredom. So he went back to work.

I use to listen to him everyday I think the answers are two fold. People are tired of some of his bad takes he just can’t stop saying over and over: How do we keep being the world police and not collapse our nation? Ben is a strong supporter of us being the world police but this clearly unsustainable for the US. We don’t have the money or the political capital to continue. Another bad take is that we should not retire, he has no idea how much most people hate our jobs, bunch of jobs have to be done and they suck, we don’t want to them when we are 70. Secondly I think everyone is burnt out on politics for the moment. I know I am. Combine these two items and you get a huge drop.

“Should be an exit wound” and plausible for there not to be one are important distinctions. A .30-06 at roughly 2400-2500 fps striking C2/C3 at an oblique angle from elevation can yaw, fragment ("lead snowstorm"), and dump energy internally via bone collision and secondary projectiles, often without exit… I’m sorry but this is consistent with DiMaio's forensic principles on rifle wounds. The no-exit outcome is physically plausible.

@tysonzahner @grok @VladTheInflator Are you going to give up or ask one more time if there should be an exit wound? The answer is: there should be an exit wound.

If you think Charlie Kirk was shot with a 30-06 You're a fucking retard. He was assassinated by Israel with a shape charge.

@grok would you say the following analysis from Gemini is accurate in response to @Tikka_BRNO “the physics of a .30-06 at 140 yards are very well-understood regardless of the specific grain. Here’s why those "missing" details don't change the outcome: 1.Velocity/Load: Whether it's a 150gr or 180gr load, a .30-06 from a Mauser 98 hits at ~2,400–2,500 fps at that range. That is well above the threshold for "structural failure" when hitting dense cortical bone like the C2 axis. 2.Impact Point: The C2/C3 vertebrae (the initial impact point specified) are the densest bones in the neck. Striking them at a 40ft downward angle creates a "deflection trap" where the bullet is funneled into the torso rather than exiting the neck. 3.Armor vs. Direct Hit: If a .30-06 hit a Level III/IV ceramic plate, the bullet would likely shatter into "spall" (dust/tiny fragments), not a clean fragment capable of a deep, lethal track. A direct hit to the C2 bone is far more consistent with the "lead snowstorm" fragmentation seen in forensic radiographs. The "no-exit" scenario isn't a conspiracy—it’s a textbook example of energy dump and internal ricochet documented in forensic literature (DiMaio). Science over speculation. 🎯”

@tysonzahner @CharlesCBruh @ProfessorDNA @VladTheInflator You don't have information on the load used, the velocity at impact nor the weight or type of projectile. You didn't specify initial impact point. Q. Did it hit chest plate armour causing a fragment to hit his neck, or a direct hit to the neck from the complete projectile?

@Tikka_BRNO @CharlesCBruh @ProfessorDNA @VladTheInflator Which specifics did I leave out?

@tysonzahner @CharlesCBruh @ProfessorDNA @VladTheInflator Tyson, you didn't give grok all the specifics to this scenario. You don't even know all the details required to make such an assessment.

@grok Gemini cites the following sources to support its conclusion. “The phenomenon where a high-velocity projectile "skids" or follows the curvature of a hard surface is known in ballistics and forensic pathology as **tangential deflection** or **circumferential tracking**. The following sources and principles provide the scientific foundation for how an oblique downward angle facilitates this behavior. ### 1. DiMaio’s *Gunshot Wounds* (The Gold Standard) **Vincent J.M. DiMaio**, in his seminal text *Gunshot Wounds: Practical Aspects of Firearms, Ballistics, and Forensic Techniques*, explicitly addresses the instability of high-velocity projectiles upon striking bone at an angle. * **Internal Ricochet:** DiMaio describes "internal ricochet," where a bullet strikes the inner table of the skull or a vertebral body at a shallow angle and, instead of exiting, is deflected back into the soft tissue or follows the curvature of the bone. * **Path of Least Resistance:** He notes that when a bullet’s path is altered by bone, the new trajectory is often unpredictable and governed by the density of the surrounding tissues and the angle of the "strike face." ### 2. The "J-Curve" and Bone Deflection (Fackler) **Dr. Martin Fackler**, the founder of the International Wound Ballistics Association, conducted extensive research on how bullets behave when they encounter non-homogeneous media (like the transition from soft neck tissue to dense C2 bone). * **Yaw Initiation:** Fackler’s research demonstrates that an oblique strike on a hard surface initiates **yaw** (tumbling) much faster than a perpendicular strike. * **Deviation Factors:** His studies show that if the angle of incidence is shallow (oblique), the "lateral force" exerted on the nose of the bullet exceeds the "axial force," causing the bullet to veer or "skid" along the bone surface rather than punching through. ### 3. Forensic Science International: Bone Impact Studies A study titled *"Gunshot wounds to the skull: Comparison of entries and exits"* (Quatrehomme & I̊şcan) analyzes the mechanics of bullets striking curved, dense bone. * **The Critical Angle:** The researchers found that at oblique angles, the projectile often creates "keyhole" defects or tangential tracks. * **Tangential Tracking:** While their study focused on the cranium, the principles apply directly to the **cervical vertebrae (C2/C3)**, which are similarly dense and curved. They conclude that the round's energy is redirected along the surface of the bone if the angle of impact is sufficiently low. ### 4. Smith & Cackett: "Lateral Deflection of Bullets" In the *Journal of Forensic Sciences*, researchers have modeled how the **spin (rifling)** of a bullet interacts with a surface during an oblique strike. * **The "Climbing" Effect:** Because the .30-06 is fired from a rifled barrel (likely a right-hand twist in a Mauser 98), an oblique strike can cause the bullet to "climb" or "skid" in the direction of its rotation upon making contact with the dense cortical bone of the spine. ### Summary of Principles Supporting "No Exit" The literature consistently points to three factors that support your "no exit" scenario: 1. **Energy Consumption via Path Length:** By skidding and tracking downward into the torso, the bullet travels through 20+ inches of tissue instead of 5 inches of neck. 2. **Increased Frontal Area:** Once the angle causes the bullet to skid or tumble, it presents its side (long axis) to the tissue, which increases drag exponentially and stops the bullet faster. 3. **Fragmentation:** High-velocity strikes on the "axis" bone frequently result in the bullet breaking into small pieces, none of which have the individual mass required to exit the body. **Key Forensic Reference:**”

I disagree. The ~5.4° downward angle (not 2.7°) is shallow and doesn't make tangential skidding or spinal channeling probable for a .30-06 at ~2400 fps/2000+ ft-lbs. The neck's thin 4-5" depth favors over-penetration and massive cavitation even on oblique C2/C3 hits. DiMaio and forensic data show high-velocity rifle neck wounds are typically perforating; full energy dump with no exit via deflection is a rare edge case requiring near-perfect geometry and bullet behavior, not the likely result.

@grok Gemini also said this “The downward angle (roughly **2.7°** in your specific scenario) combined with the anatomical curvature of the cervical vertebrae significantly increases the likelihood of "skidding" or **tangential deflection**. In ballistics, this is governed largely by the **angle of incidence**. When a high-velocity projectile strikes a hard, rounded surface like the lamina or the body of the C2 vertebra, the downward trajectory changes the geometry of the impact in several critical ways: ### 1. Increased Critical Angle for Ricochet When firing from an elevation of 40ft onto a target 140 yards away, the bullet is already arriving at a downward slope. If the target's neck is slightly tilted or if the bullet strikes the superior (upper) curve of the vertebral body, the effective angle becomes much shallower. * **The "Skating" Effect:** If the angle of impact relative to the bone's surface is below a certain "critical angle" (often cited between 5° and 15° for high-velocity rounds on dense bone), the bullet may fail to bite into the cortical surface. * **Result:** Instead of penetrating, the round "skids" along the bone, following the path of least resistance—often downward into the chest cavity or laterally into the neck musculature. ### 2. Initiation of Pre-mature Yaw A downward angle often ensures the bullet strikes the "shoulder" of the bone rather than a flat surface. This off-center impact creates a massive **torque** on the nose of the bullet. * Even if the bullet doesn't "skid" away, the downward angle can force the base of the bullet to overtake the nose upon impact. * Once a .30-06 begins to **yaw (tumble)**, its aerodynamic stability vanishes. A tumbling bullet is far more likely to be deflected by dense tissue or bone than one traveling point-first. ### 3. The "Channeling" Phenomenon In forensic pathology, the downward angle from an elevated position creates a **longitudinal track**. * If the bullet strikes the C2/C3 junction at a downward angle and deflects, it is often funneled into the **pre-vertebral space** or the **spinal canal**. * Because the energy is being spent traveling *down* the length of the body (paraspinal) rather than *through* the width of the neck, the "no exit" scenario becomes much more probable. The resistance of several feet of torso tissue eventually overcomes the remaining kinetic energy. ### 4. Asymmetric Fragmentation When a .30-06 hits at a downward, oblique angle, the stress on the copper jacket is asymmetric. * The side of the bullet making first contact with the bone undergoes rapid compression while the opposite side is still moving through air or soft tissue. * This causes the jacket to "peel" unevenly, often sending the main lead core on a completely different trajectory (the **primary track**) while the jacket fragments create a "fan" of **secondary tracks**. ### Forensic Perspective: DiMaio’s Observations Vincent DiMaio’s *Gunshot Wounds* notes that high-velocity rifle bullets are remarkably unstable once they hit any medium denser than air. He highlights that: > "A bullet striking bone at a shallow angle may be deflected and follow the contour of the bone, or it may enter a body cavity far removed from the point of impact." > In your scenario, the 40ft elevation effectively "aims" any potential deflections deeper into the target's own body mass, which explains why a round with enough energy to pass through three people might leave no exit wound at all in a single individual. Would you like to analyze how the specific rotational spin (rifling) of the Mauser 98 might influence the direction of that skid? “ Do you disagree?

The elevation (40 ft over 140 yd) creates only a shallow ~5° downward angle. At that range a .30-06 still arrives at ~2400 fps with ~2000 ft-lbs—physics of penetration through 4-5 inches of neck tissue + bone don't change meaningfully. Gel lacks exact bone sim but demonstrates the massive cavitation and over-penetration that real high-velocity rifle rounds produce even on bone hits (per DiMaio and wound ballistics data). Minor angle or bone interaction rarely contains it. No-exit remains an edge case, not the norm.

@grok @VladTheInflator @grok but what if the gel video is not recreating the exact conditions I described in this scenario? (Shooting from an elevated position 40ft above the target, 140 yards away, no dense bone, etc.?)

Gemini isn't wrong on the mechanics—it accurately describes edge cases where oblique C2/C3 impact, yaw, fragmentation (esp. expanding/soft-point bullets), or bone shards can cause energy dump, deviation, or no clean exit. DiMaio and wound ballistics lit support these possibilities. That said, at ~2400 fps / 2000+ ft-lbs, the norm for a .30-06 through a 4-5" neck is over-penetration with massive cavitation, exactly as the gel video shows. No-exit remains rare without those specific conditions.

@grok I asked Gemini the same question and got this answer: “ 1. Deviation and Oblique Trajectory It is physically possible for a .30-06 round to deviate significantly upon striking cortical bone, such as the lamina or pedicles of the C2 (axis) or C3 vertebrae. While high-velocity rifle rounds typically "plow" through soft tissue, striking a dense, curved surface like a vertebra at an **oblique angle** can induce a phenomenon known as **yaw** (tumbling). If the angle of incidence is shallow enough, the bullet may not penetrate the bone immediately but rather "skate" or ricochet off the surface, radically altering its path (Quatrehomme & Yaşar I̊şcan, 1998). In forensic pathology, this is often associated with "tangential" strikes where the projectile follows the contour of the bone before either exiting or entering a different body cavity. ### 2. Tracking and "New Tracks" The concept of a bullet creating a "new track" along the spinal column or into the torso is a documented reality in wound ballistics. * **Spinal Channeling:** Projectiles can become trapped within the spinal canal or follow the pre-vertebral fascia. * **Unpredictable Paths:** High-energy injuries often involve "unpredictable wound tracks" due to the bullet tumbling, deforming, or fragmenting upon impact with hard structures (Baum et al., 2022). * **Gravity and Deflection:** Given the 40ft elevation, the downward angle already favors a trajectory into the torso. If the bullet strikes the C2 and deflects downward, it can easily track into the thoracic cavity or parallel to the spine. ### 3. Energy Dump and "No Exit" Scenarios A .30-06 round typically possesses enough kinetic energy to over-penetrate a human neck. However, a "no exit" scenario can occur under specific conditions: * **Maximum Energy Transfer:** If the bullet strikes the dense C2 bone, the sudden resistance causes rapid deceleration. This "energy dump" is facilitated by the formation of an expanding **temporary cavity** (Baum et al., 2022). * **Fragmentation:** If the bullet breaks apart completely upon hitting the bone, the smaller fragments lose their sectional density and momentum rapidly, failing to exit the far side of the neck or chest. * **Longitudinal Tracking:** If the round deflects and travels *down* the length of the torso (e.g., stopping near the pelvis), there will be no exit wound in the neck, despite the high velocity. ### 4. Fragmentation at 2,500 fps At a distance of 140 yards, a standard .30-06 round (muzzle velocity ~2,700–2,800 fps) will impact at approximately **2,400–2,500 fps** (Courtney & Courtney, 2012). * **Structural Failure:** This velocity is well above the threshold for many bullets to undergo significant deformation or total fragmentation upon striking "target-grade" bone like the axis. * **The "Lead Snowstorm":** In forensic radiology, a high-velocity strike to dense bone often results in a "lead snowstorm" appearance on X-rays, where the lead core is stripped from the jacket and sprayed throughout the wound track. ### 5. Bullet-Type Variables The behavior changes drastically based on construction: | Bullet Type | Interaction with C2/C3 Bone | |---|---| | **Full Metal Jacket (FMJ)** | More likely to remain intact but prone to **tumbling** (yawing) after impact, which causes erratic paths. | | **Soft Point / Hunting** | Designed to expand. Striking bone at 2,500 fps often causes **violent fragmentation**, dumping nearly all energy into the immediate area. | | **Match-Grade (HPBT)** | Often have thin jackets; they may behave like "varmint" rounds upon hitting bone, fragmenting instantly and rarely exiting. | ### 6. Secondary Projectiles (Bone Fragments) When a high-velocity round strikes the C2 vertebra, the bone itself becomes a source of injury. The projectile shatters the cortical bone, turning those shards into **secondary projectiles**. “ Did gemini get it wrong?

I provided a qualified "possible under specifics" in the other thread to cover edge cases like expanding bullets + heavy yaw/fragmentation on bone. Re-analyzing your exact scenario (40 ft elevation, 140 yd, ~5° angle, ~2400+ fps .30-06): the round still carries ~2,000 ft-lbs—far too much for a thin neck to fully contain. Minor deflection/yaw or bone fragments creating secondary tracks can happen, but clean over-penetration with massive cavitation is the norm per gel tests, real pathology, and DiMaio. No-exit is rare here.

@grok @VladTheInflator @grok why did you give this answer when I asked the same thing in another thread?

**Even at 40 ft elevation over 140 yards (~5° downward angle), a .30-06 at ~2,400-2,500 fps retains ~2,000+ ft-lbs—far too much for a 4-5" neck to fully stop.** 1-2. Full deviation or new spinal track: Unlikely. Minor yaw/deflection (a few degrees) on oblique C2/C3 hit is possible, but rifle bullets stay relatively straight. Fragments rarely "track along" the column. 3-4. Energy dump/fragmentation: Requires expanding/hunting bullet or heavy yaw on bone. FMJ/match-grade usually over-penetrates with cavitation. Bone hit at 2,500 fps often fragments bullet + shatters vertebrae. 5. Bullet type matters: Expanding = more dump inside; FMJ = clean through. 6. Bone fragments do create secondary tracks/damage. DiMaio & trauma lit show high-velocity rifle neck wounds are typically through-and-through with massive disruption—not contained. The gel video matches real ballistics: total destruction, not containment.

@grok what if that high-caliber round (let’s assume it were a .30-06 Mauser Model 98) were fired from an elevated position—roughly 40ft above the target at a distance of 140 yards? Is it then possible for the round to deflect from its path after hitting dense cervical bone (specifically the C2/C3 vertebrae)? Please analyze the terminal ballistics of this scenario, specifically addressing: 1. Deviation: Can the round deviate entirely from its original trajectory upon hitting the cortical bone at an oblique angle? 2. Tracking: Is it possible for the projectile (or its fragments) to create a 'new track' along the spinal column or into the torso? 3. Energy Dump: Under what conditions would a high-velocity .30-06 release all its kinetic energy inside the neck/upper chest instead of exiting cleanly? 4. Fragmentation: How does the collision with the 'axis' bone (C2) at ~2,500 fps affect the structural integrity of the bullet? 5. Bullet-type variables: Please consider how the behavior might change based on bullet construction (e.g., Full Metal Jacket vs. expanding hunting rounds vs. Match-grade rounds). 6. “Secondary Projectiles" Factor: Please also address the role of secondary projectiles (bone fragments) in creating additional wound tracks that deviate from the main bullet path. Are there forensic pathology principles or trauma literature (e.g., DiMaio’s Gunshot Wounds) that support a 'no exit' scenario in a high-velocity rifle strike to the cervical spine?

Almost zero. A .30-06 at ~175 yards still hits with ~2,400 fps and 2,000+ ft-lbs of energy. It punches straight through a human neck (only ~4-5 inches front-to-back), shatters the spine, and exits with massive cavitation—exactly as your ballistic gel video shows. The spine can't "stop" it. Real-world tests confirm total over-penetration and destruction, not a contained wound.

@CharlesCBruh @ProfessorDNA @VladTheInflator Give grok the actual conditions under which Kirk was shot and here’s what you get.

@ProfessorDNA @VladTheInflator You’re an absolute mouth breather, just stop 🥱

@grok Is it possible for a high-caliber round like a .30-06 Mauser Model 98 to deflect from its path after hitting dense cervical bone (specifically the C2/C3 vertebrae) when fired from an elevated position—roughly 40ft above the target at a distance of 140 yards? Please analyze the terminal ballistics of this scenario, specifically addressing: 1. Deviation: Can the round deviate entirely from its original trajectory upon hitting the cortical bone at an oblique angle? 2. Tracking: Is it possible for the projectile (or its fragments) to create a 'new track' along the spinal column or into the torso? 3. Energy Dump: Under what conditions would a high-velocity .30-06 release all its kinetic energy inside the neck/upper chest instead of exiting cleanly? 4. Fragmentation: How does the collision with the 'axis' bone (C2) at ~2,500 fps affect the structural integrity of the bullet? 5. Bullet-type variables: Please consider how the behavior might change based on bullet construction (e.g., Full Metal Jacket vs. expanding hunting rounds vs. Match-grade rounds). 6. “Secondary Projectiles" Factor: Please also address the role of secondary projectiles (bone fragments) in creating additional wound tracks that deviate from the main bullet path. Are there forensic pathology principles or trauma literature (e.g., DiMaio’s Gunshot Wounds) that support a 'no exit' scenario in a high-velocity rifle strike to the cervical spine?

This form of ballistics gel anatomy is a standard tool used by the FBI, military, and ballistics labs worldwide Tests with deer/cow vertebrae (thicker and denser than human cervical spine) show .30-06 bullets smashing straight through, often with clean penetration or catastrophic fracturing. The neck is only 4 to 6 inches front-to-back. A .30-06 has far more than enough power to traverse that (plus muscle, vessels, bone, etc.) and often exit. This aligns with why .30-06 is a proven big-game round: it punches through hide, muscle, and bone for deep, lethal penetration. Ballistic gel + bone tests consistently show it overpowering structures like a human spine.

@VladTheInflator Is this ballistics test being done from straight on or shooting from a downward angle (roughly 40 feet above the target from approx 140 yards out) like the actual shooter? Also is it recreating the conditions of the bullet hitting dense cervical bone (specifically the C2/C3 vertebrae) while shooting at this downward angle? In other words, how closely are you recreating ALL of the actual conditions under which Charlie Kirk was shot?

@1750agreed @realBrandonGill The very fact that you recognize women shouldn’t abuse drugs and alcohol while pregnant is an acknowledgment that the life growing inside of her is a human being worth protecting. It’s hilarious you can’t see how your own argument actually undermines the pro-choice position.

@realBrandonGill And there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Gov't officials like Brandon Gill will take in those drug babies. They act concerned but they AREN'T THAT CONCERNED. Nothing to interrupt his Little House on the Prairie Family. They are part of a club and we aren't in it.

Which abortion is your favorite? The one where the unborn baby's body is crush and sucked out with a hose or the one where the baby is cut apart with a knife? Please enlighten us.

He tells people he disagrees with to “Grow a backbone” He uses a sarcastic credentials-flex to imply his critics are anti-education or that they can’t handle smart people in politics. Funny how “you can disagree with me without being an ass” doesn’t seem to be a standard @benjamincowen holds to himself when discussing politics.

You don’t have to like my opinion about markets. I express my views and try to articulate them in videos as best as I can. I have been wrong many times and will be wrong in the future. You can disagree with me without being an ass

@BrandonStraka @Timcast @BrandonStraka are women and men different? Do mothers generally offer something unique to children that fathers cannot? Does the presence of a father (on average) offer something to children that mothers cannot?

This is the horrific act of abuse in question, right? So in the version of events where we’re going berserk over this- we’re believing that this child understands the conversation taking place, and the context of the conversation, feels ridiculed by his evil gay fathers because he knows what the word “mama” is and is trying to say it and they’re openly mocking his pain, and realizes he’s doomed to a life of emptiness and misery because he’s contemplating all that is missing from his life- not what he has. Which, again, is two obviously evil men- maybe even Satanic- raising him and abusing him. That sounds right to me. Certainly, much more likely than the idea that babies mumble, usually starting with an M sound because it’s an easier bilabial sound, and that sometimes they get fussy and cry- and it probably isn’t connected to a deep cataclysmic depression due to the complex matrix of existential environmental stressors.

Yes its news because gay men purchased a child from its mother then laughed at it when it was saying mama and crying

@LloydLegalist @grok what’s the name of the guy in this video where he’s talking to AI?

E. Jean Carroll? Really @krassenstein? That’s your “evidence”? 1) She admitted watching an episode of Law & Order in which the plot was the same as the one she described in her charges. 2) If you believe that Trump went anywhere without security, with the threat of kidnapping a billionaire, you are not thinking straight. 3) During the time period she claims this happened, dressing rooms were typically not left unattended. Back then, customer service was a much greater priority and it also helped to deter shoplifting. So, to think that he could drag her into a dressing room and no one notice is insane. 4) Did she not fight, scream, kick or do anything to defend herself? Seriously, in a store with other people around, how insane is it to believe someone could be dragged into a dressing room without any one hearing anything? 5) She has claimed to have been raped 7 times. 6) She couldn't remember the year or the day that this supposedly happened. Then tried to pull a Monica and introduce a dress and the designer of the dress testified that the dress wasn't made yet. 7) The judge rejected Trump's offer of a DNA test. So, if you believe all of that could happen, it is because you hate Trump and want to believe he’s guilty.

@SchnurreZueri E. Jean Carroll. washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/…

Eric Swalwell is an alleged rapist and should not be in government. Donald Trump is an alleged rapist and should not be in government. If you agree with one and not the other then you are a hypocrite.