UnionFitterUA

Trump-NATO row is theater. Trump is playing his part. Rutte plays his role, Macron, Starmer etc... The Trump-NATO "fracture" is actually an MIC-NATO duplication. Trump's role is to place doubt in NATO, show disappointment in the alliance and create alarm in Europe. EU political factions, once upon a time, argued there was no need for an EU army because it would duplicate NATO. The narrative has now been flipped. GIven Trump's statements, the EU is "forced" to take security into its own hands... to duplicate NATO. Double the weapons, double the bureaucracy, double the MIC sales and further militarize Europe. High energy costs to produce weapons are no longer a political or budgetary restraint, but an accepted reality. Dmitry Medvedev: Of course, neither Trump nor America will withdraw from NATO. There's no point in it, and Congress won't allow it. Trump's rhetoric is just a stunt. However, symbolic actions like reducing the size of the American contingent or refusing to deploy something are possible. But that's not the point here. It's obvious that there are strong contradictions within the alliance, which have been exacerbated by the Iranian campaign. And European politicians, especially in Brussels, are seriously considering creating a full-fledged military component within the EU. And this changes the world picture. Until now, our rhetoric about membership in the European Union has been restrained and calm towards all neighbors, even towards the Banderist Ukraine. Join if you want. But now everything should change - the EU is no longer an economic union. It could quickly turn into a full-fledged and extremely hostile military alliance against Russia, in some ways worse than NATO.

BREAKING: Kash Patel’s FBI has filed a motion to reject discovery requests in the Seth Rich laptop case.

🚨BREAKING NEWS Dmitry Medvedev: Of course, neither Trump nor America will withdraw from NATO. There's no point in it, and Congress won't allow it. Trump's rhetoric is just a stunt. However, symbolic actions like reducing the size of the American contingent or refusing to deploy something are possible. But that's not the point here. It's obvious that there are strong contradictions within the alliance, which have been exacerbated by the Iranian campaign. And European politicians, especially in Brussels, are seriously considering creating a full-fledged military component within the EU. And this changes the world picture. Until now, our rhetoric about membership in the European Union has been restrained and calm towards all neighbors, even towards the Banderist Ukraine. Join if you want. But now everything should change - the EU is no longer an economic union. It could quickly turn into a full-fledged and extremely hostile military alliance against Russia, in some ways worse than NATO. It will be a disgusting mob of rabid European parasites. And their task will be to earn political capital and, of course, money by fanning Russophobic hysteria. What am I getting at with all this? Well, it's time to abandon a tolerant attitude towards our neighbors joining the military-economic European Union, including the country 404. Our President recently did this in a neat form, hinting to a certain comrade Vovaevich that membership in the EAEU and membership in the European Union are incompatible...

If you get your political advice from this Low IQ loser - seek help.