Care Bear

189 posts

Care Bear banner
Care Bear

Care Bear

@uberfinitist

come to fujairah habibi

Fujairah Katılım Ocak 2026
37 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@MikeyNohMore For all serious countries, almost anything their citizens do at scale is policy. I don't think policymaking and policytaking 1st worlders really forget this. This is why for eg heads of state will make trade deals with other countries on behalf of a handful of domestic corps.
English
0
1
15
2.1K
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@JohnDoeTheDoe99 @realvrios_ Yes the individual villages thing is wrong (I said it was an exaggeration). But it is true for neighboring villages.
English
1
0
1
162
Blonde Catboy😺🏳️‍🌈
@uberfinitist @realvrios_ That’s waaaay too verbose and a completely different claim than the one you made. Remember Africa is fucking huge and much of North Africa is basically white. You said individual villages.
English
1
0
1
168
wapdad
wapdad@herratic4000·
i know all the indians
English
2
1
12
386
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@afinkek @systematicls You don't see why someone's utility may be convex at low resolution? There are things you can buy with a lot of money (retirement, security, political power, special treatment) that you can't buy with little money, and people may put a lot of stock in these things.
English
0
0
0
12
and
and@afinkek·
@systematicls I don't buy it. Even with linear utility you'd have to be extremely (read: not rational) lucky, like top 0.001% quantile or something, before you expect to gain. Unless you factor in the joy of thrill into your utility. Ie our gambling addiction as the rational reason to punt.
English
2
0
4
1.8K
sysls
sysls@systematicls·
People who are highly numerate tend to be shocked that I frequently punt on negative EV, low probability games (e.g. lottery). There is a logical reason why. In games of negative EV, you "lose money" by playing an infinite amount of times, because your expected edge is negative. In systems that are ergodic - that is, you CAN reach the "infinite amount of times", then you SHOULD avoid games of negative EV. A good example my audience would understand is trading. In trading, you can trade hundreds of thousands of times in a single day. If every trade is negative EV, you are going to go bankrupt very soon. It does not take very long to reach "the long run". On the other hand, human lives are not ergodic. If I bought a lottery a million times, I would indeed lose money on average. If the multiverse existed, then yes, a million sysls would buy the same lottery, and as a whole, we would lose money. But this me, in this world, will never buy enough lotteries to reach the "long run". On the other hand, the amount to punt is insignificant whilst the amount on the infinitesimally small chance of winning is actually meaningful. I COULD bet a thousand times in this lifetime, lose it all, and not have it affect my utility in any material sense. On the other hand, I just need to win once to have a significant shift in my utility. You can extrapolate this to most games of extreme fat tails - like start-ups, for example.
English
59
14
559
66.7K
Anarch97
Anarch97@anarch97·
The ‘great sort’ is total twitter bullshit by the way
English
4
3
67
19.6K
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@systematicls Put concisely, your utility function is convex when zoomed out.
English
0
0
1
379
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@anarch97 They are all but guaranteed decent success within their own countries, by the measure of their own countries. The "great sort" only holds in the context of open economic zones.
English
0
0
5
788
Care Bear
Care Bear@uberfinitist·
@anarch97 A weak version is true. If you are in fact conscientious (1SD+) and intelligent (1SD+) and moderately healthy (-1SD+) in the West, you will (say 80% odds) be at least solidly middle class (1SD+ household income) by your 40s.
English
2
0
3
400
J.
J.@PresentWitness_·
@JSlither92565 Not with having their infrastructure obliterated and the American bases destroyed as Israel takes more territory and advances further in the region.
English
2
0
0
727
J.
J.@PresentWitness_·
My take on Tucker Carlson: He is (likely) working with pro-Gulf elements within the CIA and global elite circles but this is actually a good thing for America since our interests more closely align with Gulf nations than with [redacted].
English
51
30
890
39K